Liberal Forum

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 8:12 am

The real victims in your clip are those kids that have such pieces of trash for parents. I'm sure they are going to follow in mom and dad's footprints too.

The were screwed as soon as the sperm hit the egg... but yeah, blame the cops.



​​​​​​

The parents are not responsible for glendale police torturing the dad, cheer leader.

Badmouthing the victims will only get you so far, loser. EVENTUALLY, you have to deal with two facts:

1. You saw the police torture a citizen by tasing his nutsac in front of his family;
2. You learned this behavior was found to be WITHIN POLICY of the glendale police department.

Now, the fact that you continue to attack the victims - loathsome though they may be - and excuse the torturers merely shows you for a nutless cheer leader and the reason this nation is in such **** shape. 

You are to citizenship as that couple is to parenting, cheer leader.
 

Cannonpointer » 30 Jun 2024, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 8:13 am

Gay boy fake conservative has no idea that local agencies routinely get federal funds.

You could blow him over with a feather. 

Gay boy fake conservative is latching on to anything he can say to desperately scramble on behalf of the police state he worships.

Again with the all or nothing.

I must either hate them all, or I worship them all... by your flawed logic.

You take the same position with the Jews.

What about ***?

If I don't hate them all, does that make me a *** lover too?

 

 
 

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 8:22 am

Again with the all or nothing.

I must either hate them all, or I worship them all... by your flawed logic.

You take the same position with the Jews.

What about ***?

If I don't hate them all, does that make me a *** lover too?

You are a mealy mouth defender of the police state. 

I showed you bad acts by a police officer, and you attacked his victim - which is a defense of his behavior. You're trying to get us to look away from what he did and at who he did it TO.

You tell the shameless whore's "bad apple" lie, even though you were FORE-WARNED that lie is radioactive because his department AFFIRMED the torture.

Now you try to throw *** and jews between me and the cops, because you are a desperate cock-park for the thin blue line of semen you open wide for. 
 

Cannonpointer » 30 Jun 2024, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 8:31 am

You are a mealy mouth defender of the police state. 

I showed you bad acts by a police officer, and you attacked his victim - which is a defense of his behavior. You're trying to get us to look away from what he did and at who he did it TO.

You tell the shameless whore's "bad apple" lie, even though you were FORE-WARNED that lie is radioactive because his department AFFIRMED the torture.

Now you try to throw *** and jews between me and the cops, because you are a desperate cock-park for the thin blue line of semen you open wide for.

So, do you hate all ***, or are you a *** lover?

Your logic states you have to be in one camp or the other.

You can't appreciate the good ones and condemn the bad ones... you either hate them all, or your worship them and want to throat their cocks.

Your rules.

 

 
 

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 8:38 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 8:38 am

So, do you hate all ***, or are you a *** lover?

Your logic states you have to be in one camp or the other.

You can't appreciate the good ones and condemn the bad ones... you either hate them all, or your worship them and want to throat their cocks.

Your rules.

Weasel words, reframes, questions... where did you learn this behavior, fruitcake?

You have defended torture, attacking the victim and lying that it was a "bad apple" situation, even though you were made aware in advance that the behavior was found to be within policy - which means this could happen to ANY citizen.

You are desperately trying to derail the topic, begging *** and jews to somehow validate your effeminate cosign of police brutality.
 

Cannonpointer » 30 Jun 2024, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 8:42 am

Weasel words, reframes, questions... where did you learn this behavior, fruitcake?

You have defended torture, attacking the victim and lying that it was a "bad apple" situation, even though you were made aware in advance that the behavior was found to be within policy - which means this could happen to ANY citizen.

You are desperately trying to derail the topic, begging *** and jews to somehow validate your effeminate cosign of police brutality.

What have I reframed?

I'm employing YOUR logic here, and now YOU are the one waffling.

You can't gaslight me sonny.

I'm immune to that ****.

 


 

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 8:48 am

What have I reframed?

I'm employing YOUR logic here, and now YOU are the one waffling.

You can't gaslight me sonny.

I'm immune to that ****.

I cannot "gaslight" a *** who called torture a "bad apple" act even AFTER it was affirmed by his department. 

He is BY GOD gonna make this about *** and jews and mayonnaise and anything EXCEPT the police brutality he is on record defending like the good girl his mama raised. 

Keep reframing, asking unrelated questions, ducking the issue, BV. WHATEVER you do, don't let me "gaslight" you by staying on the topic.       
 

Cannonpointer » 30 Jun 2024, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 8:50 am

I cannot "gaslight" a *** who called torture a "bad apple" act even AFTER it was affirmed by his department. 

He is BY GOD gonna make this about *** and jews and mayonnaise and anything EXCEPT the police brutality he is on record defending like the good girl his mama raised. 

Keep reframing, asking unrelated questions, ducking the issue, BV. WHATEVER you do, don't let me "gaslight" you by staying on the topic.     

Torture?

Talk about a reframe...

The guy was trying to kick the cop in the teeth and got tased. He most likely didn't want to produce or wasn't carrying an ID because he had warrants. 

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

I get the feeling you've won some stupid prizes a time or two as well, which would explain your intense hatred for police officers. 

​​​​This thread started out with you chastising a cop for doing nothing, and then turned into hating a different cop for doing too much... and you say I'm the wishy washy one.

Go figure.

 
 

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 9:04 am

Torture?

Talk about a reframe...

I am not an expert on the homosexual community's games, but I am going to go out on a limb and argue that the heterosexual community considers electric shocks to the balls torture, fruitcake.

It is expressly mentioned in the Geneva Conventions AS torture, and prohibited to be used against America's ENEMIES - much less its own citizens.

Still, thank you for demonstrating your desperation to defend the police state, that you would scoff at torture and try to call it... what? What, if not torture, does the gay community believe it to be, Peaches?

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 9:04 am

The guy was trying to kick the cop in the teeth and got tased. He most likely didn't want to produce or wasn't carrying an ID because he had warrants. 

You are a lying piece of ****. Anyone can click the link and see that the brutality preceded his DEFENSIVE movements. Only a gay would pretend he did anything offensive.

That's you, ***.

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 9:04 am

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

He was a passenger. The cop tried to ID him. He informed the officer - CORRECTLY - that the police had no probably cause to demand his ID.

Just because a blue-line licking ****** waives his rights like a girl, that doesn't mean everyone has to. That cop swore to PROTECT the very rights he was violating - and your reaction is to lick the COP'S taint and slander the citizen who did nothing but assert his rights.

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 9:04 am

I get the feeling you've won some stupid prizes a time or two as well, which would explain your intense hatred for police officers. 

You get the feeling of dicks in your *** every saturday night, weakness.

Your "feelings" and two dollars gets ya coffee, fruitcake.

Cannonpointer » 30 Jun 2024, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 1:33 pm

I am not an expert on the homosexual community's games, but I am going to go out on a limb and argue that the heterosexual community considers electric shocks to the balls torture, fruitcake.

It is expressly mentioned in the Geneva Conventions AS torture, and prohibited to be used against America's ENEMIES - much less its own citizens.

Still, thank you for demonstrating your desperation to defend the police state, that you would scoff at torture and try to call it... what? What, if not torture, does the gay community believe it to be, Peaches?

You are a lying piece of ****. Anyone can click the link and see that the brutality preceded his DEFENSIVE movements. Only a gay would pretend he did anything offensive.

That's you, ***.

He was a passenger. The cop tried to ID him. He informed the officer - CORRECTLY - that the police had no probably cause to demand his ID.

Just because a blue-line licking ****** waives his rights like a girl, that doesn't mean everyone has to. That cop swore to PROTECT the very rights he was violating - and your reaction is to lick the COP'S taint and slander the citizen who did nothing but assert his rights.

You get the feeling of dicks in your *** every saturday night, weakness.

Your "feelings" and two dollars gets ya coffee, fruitcake.

The cop should have arrested the driver, told the guy and the other passenger to take a hike, called DCS to take custody of the children, and impounded the car... that way his "rights" would have been left intact.

​​​​
 
 

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 1:45 pm

The cop should have arrested the driver, told the guy and the other passenger to take a hike, called DCS to take custody of the children, and impounded the car... that way his "rights" would have been left intact.

​​​​

You should have stayed off dick, NEVER pretended that electric shocks to the nut sac is not torture, stopped at the taint, and not been a blue line licking weak ***.

Stealing a man's children may SEEM like leaving his rights intact in the gay world, fruity. Not in the hetero world.

Has spitting the dick out EVER occurred to you, ya frank burns piece of anti-freedom ****?

Cannonpointer » 30 Jun 2024, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 1:52 pm

You should have stayed off dick, NEVER pretended that electric shocks to the nut sac is not torture, stopped at the taint, and not been a blue line licking weak ***.

Stealing a man's children may SEEM like leaving his rights intact in the gay world, fruity. Not in the hetero world.

Has spitting the dick out EVER occurred to you, ya frank burns piece of anti-freedom ****?

I've never sucked a dick, let alone two... like some people I know.

 
 

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 2:07 pm

I've never sucked a dick, let alone two... like some people I know.

So the taint fondling we've seen from you - eager and professional though it appears - is NOT the obvious precursor to load-swallow that it appears?

Well done, taint licker. Well done. 
 
 

Sumela » 28 Jun 2024, 3:22 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2024, 3:22 pm

Dayyum. 

He let one hour and ten minutes pass.....what a ******.

Careful.

Rippy's on the taintpath. 
 

Sumela » 28 Jun 2024, 4:30 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jun 2024, 4:30 pm

Police and Military....the muscle for BIG GOVT.

AND they are the turds that SMALL GOVT con-tards worship the most.

Son, you called the living **** out of this one. 

I have one of the frank burns pussies arguing that TASING A MAN'S NUT SAC REPEATEDLY is not torture. 

I **** you not - you can probably guess which ***. 
 

Cannonpointer » 30 Jun 2024, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 2:12 pm

Son, you called the living **** out of this one. 

I have one of the frank burns pussies arguing that TASING A MAN'S NUT SAC REPEATEDLY is not torture. 

I **** you not - you can probably guess which ***.

Don't buck up on the cops, and that **** won't happen.

I'll bet you were never paddled as a child huh?

It shows.

 


 

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 2:20 pm

Don't buck up on the cops, and that **** won't happen.

No, boot licker.

Don't buck up on the cops, and that **** PROBABLY won't happen.

But now we have to deal with a boot licker's definition of "buck up." And you have already told us that standing on your Constitutional rights like a good American is "bucking up" - because you're a little teapot unworthy of the liberties better men died to bequeath you.
 
 You'd have been bootlicking the Crown in Colonial times, you effeminate little tory. 

Cannonpointer » 30 Jun 2024, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 2:24 pm

No, boot licker.

Don't buck up on the cops, and that **** PROBABLY won't happen.

But now we have to deal with a boot licker's definition of "buck up." And you have already told us that standing on your Constitutional rights like a good American is "bucking up" - because you're a little teapot unworthy of the liberties better men died to bequeath you.
 
 You'd have been bootlicking the Crown in Colonial times, you effeminate little tory.

I like the part of the story where they said "he is currently in prison on an unrelated conviction, and has been in prison before..."

He knew if he produced ID, then he was going to jail on warrants. That why the cops asked him for it... because they knew too. He knew the jig was up so he decided to fight... and he lost. 

You want to give people like him a pass and leave the criminals on the street, just like a good little progressive leftist. Defund the cops and all that jazz. Hell, you probably secretly support BLM too.

Thank God that piece of trash is in prison and away from those kids. Mom probably should be too, if she isn't already.


 

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 2:35 pm

I like the part of the story where they said "he is currently in prison on an unrelated conviction, and has been in prison before..."

Now make an assumption and pretend it is factual, blue line breath.

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 2:35 pm

He knew if he produced ID, then he was going to jail on warrants. That why the cops asked him for it... because they knew too. He knew the jig was up so he decided to fight... and he lost. 

He didn't fight. It's all on tape. He was attacked, and never made a single offensive move.

The fact you need to lie to defend your blue line heroes is a tacit admission their actions are indefensible, stupid.

*rippy38 » 30 Jun 2024, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 2:35 pm

You want to give people like him a pass and leave the criminals on the street, just like a good little progressive leftist. Defund the cops and all that jazz. Hell, you probably secretly support BLM too.

I want the police to respect civil rights and I want them to not torture Americans. You want cop cock on your tonsils.

Cannonpointer » 30 Jun 2024, 3:07 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2024, 3:07 pm

Now make an assumption and pretend it is factual, blue line breath.

He didn't fight. It's all on tape. He was attacked, and never made a single offensive move.

The fact you need to lie to defend your blue line heroes is a tacit admission their actions are indefensible, stupid.

I want the police to respect civil rights and I want them to not torture Americans. You want cop cock on your tonsils.

Is the asswipe in prison or no?

Yes he is, and on a conviction completely unrelated to the stupid prize he won in the video. It wasn't the first time either.

Good on him I say. I hope he has plenty of time to do some soul searching and get his life right while he's in prison. Getting tazed in the nuts is a sure sign that you're on the wrong path I'm life.

​​​​​​Maybe his kids with end up with someone that actually gives a **** about them too.