The Cyndi gurl trying to figure out what paradigm means......sootedupCyndi » 29 Jun 2024, 2:39 am » wrote: ↑ Well- i like Trump and think there is something *special* about him. With that being said.. the other clown. People have to clear their minds.
He IS a mental patient with dementia!
It is that simple.
but No- rather then folks having the GUTS to admit that- they chose to Lie-and attempt to cover it up. Clinging to power.
With all the people in this country? They RUN THAT?
Even the liberals on chat forums. They will not admit it- even to themselves.
bv is an example of that.
got any Miss crabby stories? i'm bored.Beakman » 29 Jun 2024, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑ The Cyndi gurl trying to figure out what paradigm means......![]()
![]()
![]()
Fetch me mah beer woman! And make it snappy!![]()
![]()
![]()
@sooted up Cyndi
par·a·digmBeakman » 29 Jun 2024, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑ The Cyndi gurl trying to figure out what paradigm means...... :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Fetch me mah beer woman! And make it snappy! :wub: :wub: :wub:
@sooted up Cyndi
Miss Crabby is BORING!
Sir - The military is WAYYY overrated.Vegas » 29 Jun 2024, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑ I don't think any nation has respect for the USA. The only reason we are feared, not respected (there is a difference) is because we have a huge military. That's it.
Well, thanks for admitting you are stupid. Note that I never mentioned illegality.FOS » 29 Jun 2024, 4:39 am » wrote: ↑ Clearly you don't have the reading comprehension to understand my point, fellow voter. But let me help you understand: eliminating leftist scum would actually be illegal.
Doesnt matter you're still the STOOPID one.murdock » 29 Jun 2024, 9:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, thanks for admitting you are stupid. Note that I never mentioned illegality.
Suck my dick with your asshole.
You know way too much about arssholes. Are your hemorrhoids itching.
That's where I come down these days, too.
If you go back and watch the debates that Ford and Carter had, you will see that it wasn't always this way.DeezerShoove » 29 Jun 2024, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑ Debates are a popularity contest. A marketing ploy.
Have we ever actually learned anything "new" about a candidate?
Suck my dick you lying filthy ****.sooted up Cyndi » 29 Jun 2024, 10:16 pm » wrote: ↑ You know way too much about arssholes. Are your hemorrhoids itching.
Your typical sub 120 already lost you halfway through your post.FOS » 29 Jun 2024, 3:22 am » wrote: ↑ ok. But to me that just means the country is **** up. Not that Trump is great.
let's examine Trump being a convicted felon, for example. Biden mentioned that no president had ever been a convicted felon. If, as biden suggests, Trump really is a rapist...then that is not merely an indictment on Trump, it is an indictment on the country.
because he was president.
Meanwhile, in the same debate, biden insisted the usa is the greatest country.
that statement is obviously contradicted by the fact we elect rapists as president, according to his world view. and it is an obvious contradiction, and he made this contradiction expecting few people would notice. And he was right. And something is wrong with the people who voted for Trump, in bidens world view. That is a lot of people.
Meanwhile, if Trump is innocent and the country is just committing bad faith lawfare on him in an attempt to keep him out of office, that is also an indictment on this country. And an indictment on people who voted for biden, which is a lot of people.
No matter how you slice it, the country sucks. It isn't even about Trump vs biden.
Wierd Al Yankonit and Schmoyoho had the best take on it.. In 24 Hours.FOS » 29 Jun 2024, 2:15 am » wrote: ↑ Basically, this was just a typical example of how nobody should take the usa seriously.
Imagine what it would be like to read a few pages of pareto and then watch this debate. They literally got in an argument about who was better at golf.
Biden called trump fat and a whiner. Both suggested their opponent was criminal. Neither could agree on basic facts.
But their priorities were rather clearly implied. Trump criticized immigration for stealing the jobs of black people. Neither mentioned what concerns white people might have.
Biden actually tried the cliche that politicians should not legislate on woman's health. Which of course translates to politicians should have no say on whether murder should be illegal. Well if that isnt part of their job, what is?
It's a dumb and fake cliche, but it does open up an interesting paradigm. Why should politicians have any say about social security then? Leave it to economists? Why should they have a say on ukraine or israel? Why not generals? What actually is the job of politicians? Just making sure black people have jobs?
Honestly, I do not see how anyone could watch that debate and still have any respect for the usa, despite how convinced biden said he was that it is the best county. Regardless of which candidate you think is unacceptable (because it has to be one or the other)...it was also a former president. These apparently are the greatest leaders that this 'country' can muster.
That's no Bolshevik.. The American Equine Apple Pie is burnt Black and Orange.LowIQTrash » 30 Dec 2025, 12:17 am » wrote: ↑ Your typical sub 120 already lost you halfway through your post.
But yes, the typical voter is extremely retarded which is why democracy / republicanism always ends up failing. It just ends up being a kleptocracy / oligarchy with a small # of people pulling the strings while everyone is bickering about meaningless subjects.
Reagan's "I refuse to take advantage of my opponents youth and inexperience" comment even made Mondale laugh.Cannonpointer » 29 Jun 2024, 10:33 pm » wrote: ↑ If you go back and watch the debates that Ford and Carter had, you will see that it wasn't always this way.
I notice you make a general claim with nospecifics regarding the SCOTUS.JohnnyYou » 30 Dec 2025, 6:26 am » wrote: ↑ Reagan's "I refuse to take advantage of my opponents youth and inexperience" comment even made Mondale laugh.
Our leadership is slowly degrading. A Mil Spec Salamander is a Brontosaurus. Design by committee has pitfalls, and our system is design by committee. I get the idea of an all powerful Oz in the Oval Cockpit. But the forefathers tried to make sure POTUS was just a dude. The Supreme Court sold out the Consitution with the immunity..
If I were running for POTUS (just to inject a nightmare) I would platform a zero term George Washington Campaign and advocate that I and every federally elected and appointed official be fired on Day One and the Military reboot our shyt and we amend out the malware out of our corrupted Constitution.
Cannonpointer » 30 Dec 2025, 6:58 pm » wrote: ↑ I notice you make a general claim with nospecifics regarding the SCOTUS.
I am left to assume you are referring to the passage of Roe v. Wade. I would just point out that they rectified that.
I may agree with that.. The forefathers were pretty fixed on that policy, however we needed people at the time..