*rippy38 » 01 Jul 2024, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑ Whether or not he has been to a trap track has nothing to do with you posing with an unloaded shotgun in a pair of shoes you bought in the kids department at Sears.
Do I need to get out the crayons and draw you a picture?
nice one....Look BV, I could be wrong, (doubt it), but that chamber is open. If I am wrong, I most certainly will say so. But that will require proof from you that it's actually closed. I'm thinking you went to the trap track, paid someone to "pose" with their safety glasses, hearing protection, and shotgun, to be able to make yourself look like a "badass". You know, the "LITTLE MAN SYNDROM".
Veggie reminds me of this guy that lived in my apartment complex back in the early 2000's when the big Harley Davidson craze was in full swing.MR-7 » 01 Jul 2024, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑ Look BV, I could be wrong, (doubt it), but that chamber is open. If I am wrong, I most certainly will say so. But that will require proof from you that it's actually closed. I'm thinking you went to the trap track, paid someone to "pose" with their safety glasses, hearing protection, and shotgun, to be able to make yourself look like a "badass". You know, the "LITTLE MAN SYNDROM".
BV is in a tight spot here. If he jumped up to a woman's size 8, the one-inch diff could look like clown shoes on his 5'6" frame.*rippy38 » 01 Jul 2024, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑ Whether or not he has been to a trap track has nothing to do with you posing with an unloaded shotgun in a pair of shoes you bought in the kids department at Sears.
Do I need to get out the crayons and draw you a picture?
Look..MR-7 » 01 Jul 2024, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑ Look BV, I could be wrong, (doubt it), but that chamber is open. If I am wrong, I most certainly will say so. But that will require proof from you that it's actually closed. I'm thinking you went to the trap track, paid someone to "pose" with their safety glasses, hearing protection, and shotgun, to be able to make yourself look like a "badass". You know, the "LITTLE MAN SYNDROM".
Next, you'll ask him about the safety protocols...
And you'll be here to whine that it is irrelevant.
That question is totally irrelevant to the fact that the shotgun is not loaded. We know...the trap track you are at requires that the gun will not be loaded, even when you are in the "shooting" area. And to think that all we have been saying is that the gun is not loaded in the pic. This seems to bother you quite a bit.
Only because it is...
No, it isn't.MR-7 » 01 Jul 2024, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ That question is totally irrelevant to the fact that the shotgun is not loaded. We know...the trap track you are at requires that the gun will not be loaded, even when you are in the "shooting" area. And to think that all we have been saying is that the gun is not loaded in the pic. This seems to bother you quite a bit.
For reasons you can't explain.
That CAN'T be "irrelevant".*rippy38 » 01 Jul 2024, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑ Another irrelevant and moronic question.
That's all you have it seems...
Your answer is "No."
Why ru a POSER?
There you go again with this "rules" ****.Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2024, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑ That CAN'T be "irrelevant".
So tell me again how you don't need Very Special Rules of Engagement....
It already been explained to you.Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2024, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑ For reasons you can't explain.
So, I'm guessing it's some kind of Rule by Divine Right.
As demonstrated, your "explanation" was*rippy38 » 01 Jul 2024, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑ It already been explained to you.
You just didn't like answer, so you did this 👇
https://i.postimg.cc/mZKcdbNK/890939-07 ... id-img.jpg
1) You didn't "demonstrate" ****... you said nuh uh!Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2024, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑ As demonstrated, your "explanation" was
A) uninformed
B) Tautological
Facts.