You either have, or have not, been.*rippy38 » 01 Jul 2024, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑ 1) You didn't "demonstrate" ****... you said nuh uh!
2) Your opinions are not facts.
nod
Okay Mr Vague and nonsensical.Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2024, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑ You either have, or have not, been.
If you haven’t, you're uninformed.
Simple.
See, in this photo, he is actually firing as you can see the shell exitingBlackvegetable » 01 Jul 2024, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑ As demonstrated, your "explanation" was
A) uninformed
B) Tautological
Facts.
Looks like he's "out in the field".MR-7 » 01 Jul 2024, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑ See, in this photo, he is actually firing as you can see the shell exiting
https://ctala.com/wp-content/uploads/20 ... x1022.jpeg
That makes PERFECT sense.
It's tough being a POSER and getting caught.
He's losing it... big time.
I've already told you... your gaslighting doesn't work on me.
Maybe so...the point is, he is actually shooting. It doesn't seem phony, cause, well, it's real. To be honest, none of this would have come up, if it weren't for the *** shoes.
Your "safety protocol" defense is laughable veggie... but keep trying.
He said the reason he was posing with an empty shotgun was because he was following "safety protocols".MR-7 » 01 Jul 2024, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑ Maybe so...the point is, he is actually shooting. It doesn't seem phony, cause, well, it's real. To be honest, none of this would have come up, if it weren't for the *** shoes.
I guess I could have argued the matter with my host, but as he was picking up the not inconsiderable expense, I let him interpret them.*rippy38 » 01 Jul 2024, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑ Your "safety protocol" defense is laughable veggie... but keep trying.
If nothing else, it's good cheap entertainment for the rest of us.
Your "host" might have told you that **** because he didn't trust you with a loaded firearm... and I can't say that I blame him.Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2024, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑ I guess I could have argued the matter with my host, but as he was picking up the not inconsiderable expense, I let him interpret them.
But I think it kinda typical that a slack jawed rube like you is convinced you know all
this guy is on the range*rippy38 » 01 Jul 2024, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑ Your "safety protocol" defense is laughable veggie... but keep trying.
If nothing else, it's good cheap entertainment for the rest of us.
It actually is.*rippy38 » 01 Jul 2024, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ He said the reason he was posing with an empty shotgun was because he was following "safety protocols".
He wants us to believe that taking a picture of someone actually firing the shotgun was against the rules.
Why do you presume to know?*rippy38 » 01 Jul 2024, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑ Your "host" might have told you that **** because he didn't trust you with a loaded firearm... and I can't say that I blame him.
They have pics here of "Tactical Shoes" to wear*rippy38 » 01 Jul 2024, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ He said the reason he was posing with an empty shotgun was because he was following "safety protocols".
He wants us to believe that taking a picture of someone actually firing the shotgun was against the rules.
I think it's more about the *** obsession of little men.MR-7 » 01 Jul 2024, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑ Maybe so...the point is, he is actually shooting. It doesn't seem phony, cause, well, it's real. To be honest, none of this would have come up, if it weren't for the *** shoes.
We weren't talking about "math", we were talking about statistics. Survivorship bias, in particular....about which you know absolutely nothing.Vegas » 01 Jul 2024, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑ He loves being vague. That's why he sucks at math. Math has no room for ambiguity. That doesn't do well for people who refuse to stand for anything. Vagueness allows him to be the coward that he is.