A strike through isn't an answer... it's you, doing this
Imagine living your life trying to keep up a constant veil of plausible deniability because you are so desperate to never be wrong... about anything.Vegas » 29 Jun 2024, 6:54 pm » wrote: ↑ You used the word '"mortality." Can you be any more vague? Of course you are intentionally vague. It's what you do when you are backed into a corner.
Definitions in math are not vague. Try again.
Now.
I posted the definition, in my words.Vegas » 29 Jun 2024, 6:54 pm » wrote: ↑ You used the word '"mortality." Can you be any more vague? Of course you are intentionally vague. It's what you do when you are backed into a corner.
Definitions in math are not vague. Try again.
Now.
Welshing pile of ****.
If an answer is whatever you say it is, it sure as **** is whatever I say it is.*rippy38 » 29 Jun 2024, 5:58 pm » wrote: ↑ A strike through isn't an answer... it's you, doing this👇
https://i.postimg.cc/N0RLMT5N/890939-07 ... id-img.jpg
Total puss out.
So, Trippie*rippy38+2Today, 7:57 pm
Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2024, 8:04 pm » wrote: ↑ I posted the definition, in my words.
You lied.
Take off.
*rippy38 » 29 Jun 2024, 7:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Imagine living your life trying to keep up a constant veil of plausible deniability because you are so desperate to never be wrong... about anything.
That would have to suck.
No...it's not subject to your approval.Vegas » 29 Jun 2024, 8:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Your definition is vague, thus it is wrong.
Definitions in math are not vague. Which explains why you suck at math.
Now try again. Mortality of what?
Tell your **** walking.Definitions in math are not vague
How many different observations did you offer on my definition?*rippy38 » 29 Jun 2024, 7:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Imagine living your life trying to keep up a constant veil of plausible deniability because you are so desperate to never be wrong... about anything.
That would have to suck.
I cannot think of one single time I have seen a link from you that was not a link to an opinion piece.
The quote is unacceptable.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2024, 4:41 pm » wrote: ↑ This won't take long...
How many versions of your response to my definition did you offer?
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
You did not answer ****, ***. That is why you are allowed PRECISELY
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2024, 8:22 pm » wrote: ↑ So, Trippie
How many different observations did you offer on my definition?
Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2024, 8:44 pm » wrote: ↑ How many different observations did you offer on my definition?