Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2024, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2024, 11:09 am

FOX'S business model involves lying to you.

Really?  
So why don't you show us that "business model" you claim to know so much about?

Is it anything like the MSNBC and CNN business models that believe you're better served by their refusal to cover anything that Trump says or does?
That's what you like?  Having a network that decides what you're stupid enough to swallow, and keep you from using your own ability to decide for yourself what you should believe?

CNN, MSNBC refuse to air 'potentially dangerous' Trump speech to supporters
Rachel Maddow said it would cost her network to 'willingly broadcast untrue things'
By Kristine Parks Fox News  June 14, 2023

Both CNN and MSNBC refused to air former President Trump's speech to supporters following his court hearing Tuesday where he pled not guilty to 37 federal felony counts stemming from his alleged improper retention of classified records.CNN anchor Jake Tapper defended the decision not to air the speech Tuesday night, bluntly telling audiences it could be "dangerous" to do so."We’re not carrying his remarks live because, frankly, he says a lot of things that are not true and sometimes potentially dangerous," Jake Tapper told CNN audiences and guest Rep. Alexandira Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y..

That's the kind of frightened sissies you prefer to support, isn't it?
 
 

Zeets2 » 08 Jul 2024, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2024, 11:47 am

Really?  
So why don't you show us that "business model" you claim to know so much about?

Is it anything like the MSNBC and CNN business models that believe you're better served by their refusal to cover anything that Trump says or does?
That's what you like?  Having a network that decides what you're stupid enough to swallow, and keep you from using your own ability to decide for yourself what you should believe?

That's the kind of frightened sissies you prefer to support, isn't it?

For years it was the Russia Russia Trump Hoax, the Fine People Hoax, the 51 intelligence leaders, etc etc etc.

Zeets2 » 08 Jul 2024, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2024, 11:47 am

Really?  
So why don't you show us that "business model" you claim to know so much about?

Is it anything like the MSNBC and CNN business models that believe you're better served by their refusal to cover anything that Trump says or does?
That's what you like?  Having a network that decides what you're stupid enough to swallow, and keep you from using your own ability to decide for yourself what you should believe?

That's the kind of frightened sissies you prefer to support, isn't it?

“Fox has a business model with an inherent contradiction, which is that they amass this huge audience by giving them what they want – and what they want is rightwing propaganda and bigotry and conspiracy theories,” Gertz said.

 “But they monetize that audience through business partners – with advertisers and cable carriers – who do not necessarily want to be associated with that sort of thing.”


https://www.theguardian.com/media/2023/ ... son-firing

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2024, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2024, 11:53 am

“Fox has a business model with an inherent contradiction, which is that they amass this huge audience by giving them what they want – and what they want is rightwing propaganda and bigotry and conspiracy theories,” Gertz said.

 “But they monetize that audience through business partners – with advertisers and cable carriers – who do not necessarily want to be associated with that sort of thing.”

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2023/ ... son-firing

LMAO!  Here is that passage with the paragraph preceding it. Media Matters?  You gotta be kidding me. You are an idiot.

When it comes to those negotiations, Carlson’s departure could be a blessing and a curse, said Matt Gertz, a senior fellow at Media Matters.

 “Fox has a business model with an inherent contradiction, which is that they amass this huge audience by giving them what they want – and what they want is rightwing propaganda and bigotry and conspiracy theories,” Gertz said.
 

*Huey » 08 Jul 2024, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2024, 11:59 am

LMAO!  Here is that passage with the paragraph preceding it. Media Matters?  You gotta be kidding me. You are an idiot.

When it comes to those negotiations, Carlson’s departure could be a blessing and a curse, said Matt Gertz, a senior fellow at Media Matters.

 “Fox has a business model with an inherent contradiction, which is that they amass this huge audience by giving them what they want – and what they want is rightwing propaganda and bigotry and conspiracy theories,” Gertz said.

What did Matt get wrong?

Why DO you religiously soak up FOXaganda?
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2024, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2024, 11:53 am

“Fox has a business model with an inherent contradiction, which is that they amass this huge audience by giving them what they want – and what they want is rightwing propaganda and bigotry and conspiracy theories,” Gertz said.

 “But they monetize that audience through business partners – with advertisers and cable carriers – who do not necessarily want to be associated with that sort of thing.”

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2023/ ... son-firing

The fact is that "giving the audience what it wants" is nothing more than giving them the most honest reporting they demand, something they have NEVER found at CNN or MSNBC!  

Can you provide any other explanation as to why the Fox audience that left when Tucker was fired soon returned to watch and enjoy their new, talented lineup?
It would seem to me that anyone unhappy with Tucker's firing tried CNN or MSNBC for a short while, then quickly returned to Fox where they found a terrific lineup of programing from The Five, Laura Ingraham, Jesse Waters, Hannity, and Gutfeld, since all have been kicking the *** of both of the liberal lying networks you love so much?
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2024, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2024, 12:01 pm

What did Matt get wrong?

Why DO you religiously soak up FOXaganda?

Media Matters? 

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2024, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2024, 12:01 pm

What did Matt get wrong?

Why DO you religiously soak up FOXaganda?

Why do you suck Soros dick?

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2024, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2024, 12:01 pm

What did Matt get wrong?

Why DO you religiously soak up FOXaganda?

These people make their money going after conservative media.


Media Matters for America is a web-based, not-for-profit, 501 (c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.

https://www.mediamatters.org/about-us#: ... S.%20media.

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2024, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2024, 12:01 pm

What did Matt get wrong?

Why DO you religiously soak up FOXaganda?

Simple, nitwit!  He got the reason Fox's audience returned is because they found Fox to be the most hones and fairly balanced network on cable, and he can't stand it so he has to resort to lies about what he THINKS we want. 
Just like you, *******!   
 

*Huey » 08 Jul 2024, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2024, 12:03 pm

Media Matters? 

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

80 minutes of distilled FOXaganda, 5x per week.



The Daily Beast reports that in a text exchange with Fox News CEO Suzanne Scott on November 4, Carlson expressed concern that the network was “getting hammered” after calling Arizona for President Biden before anyone else. Scott responded that Fox needed to “let the data folks defend their decision,” and Carlson wrote back that “if I can help in any way, I hope you’ll let me know.”

 In more urgent texts to Bret Baier, Carlson wrote ““I continue to think the company isn’t taking the [sic] seriously enough. We need to do something to reassure our core audience. They’re our whole business model.” Carlson floated various ideas, including interviewing Fox News Decision Desk Director Arnon Mishkin on his show, to “help calm our viewers down.”

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/05 ... -read.html
 

*Huey » 08 Jul 2024, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2024, 12:06 pm

These people make their money going after conservative media.

Media Matters for America is a web-based, not-for-profit, 501 (c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.

https://www.mediamatters.org/about-us#: ... S.%20media.

How does FOX make their money?

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2024, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2024, 12:09 pm

80 minutes of distilled FOXaganda, 5x per week.

The Daily Beast reports that in a text exchange with Fox News CEO Suzanne Scott on November 4, Carlson expressed concern that the network was “getting hammered” after calling Arizona for President Biden before anyone else. Scott responded that Fox needed to “let the data folks defend their decision,” and Carlson wrote back that “if I can help in any way, I hope you’ll let me know.”

 In more urgent texts to Bret Baier, Carlson wrote ““I continue to think the company isn’t taking the [sic] seriously enough. We need to do something to reassure our core audience. They’re our whole business model.” Carlson floated various ideas, including interviewing Fox News Decision Desk Director Arnon Mishkin on his show, to “help calm our viewers down.”

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/05 ... -read.html

So?

At least you know the answer. How long before you have a Biden Mental Break and forget?

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2024, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2024, 12:10 pm

How does FOX make their money?

Selling advertising.       

*Huey » 08 Jul 2024, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2024, 12:10 pm

So?

At least you know the answer. How long before you have a Biden Mental Break and forget?

In his own words..

**** rube.

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2024, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2024, 12:11 pm

In his own words..

**** rube.

*Huey » 08 Jul 2024, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2024, 12:11 pm

Selling advertising.     

Read the citation again, Unusually Stupid.

Zeets2 » 08 Jul 2024, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2024, 11:47 am

Really?  
So why don't you show us that "business model" you claim to know so much about?

Is it anything like the MSNBC and CNN business models that believe you're better served by their refusal to cover anything that Trump says or does?
That's what you like?  Having a network that decides what you're stupid enough to swallow, and keep you from using your own ability to decide for yourself what you should believe?

That's the kind of frightened sissies you prefer to support, isn't it?
 
 

Why do people need to believe life isn't self evident evolving since the moment one's body was conceived to replace previous generation gaps that two specific persons became your specific biological parents when they conceived you as a fertilized cell?

Genetic history shows your two parents had two parents themselves that became your specific 4 biological grandparents. Lets review genetic history one more generation backwards, you have 8 specific people in the whole human population that became your unique 8 great grandparents before your grandparents, before your parents, before you began evolving in series parallel time proportionately alive since conceived living eternally separated same as all previous generation gaps had and continue to do each rotation here.

Why is it you choose to never accept the natural process but willing to die defending an artificial one?

*Huey » 08 Jul 2024, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2024, 12:13 pm

You have a very odd set of responses to fact.

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2024, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2024, 12:13 pm

Read the citation again, Unusually Stupid.

See how that works?

That is how they make there money.  If you really need to know you could do what I did for media matters.  Look up their mission statement.