no, you were self gloating...feebleness at best...Blackvegetable » 04 Jul 2024, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑ Rog,
You were challenged to show that you understand the appeals process. You don't.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom All it does is it shows his massive insecurities...a feeble mental midget at best...MR-7 » 04 Jul 2024, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑ He gloats a lot. He was bragging of how his daughter is half black and half polish and has a higher I Q then anyone on here. He sure is a proud daddy.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Apparently it appears you and your source do not understand.

A gif ain't gonna do what you can't.
"self gloating"?
Would you at least confirm who the "1" is?*Huey » 04 Jul 2024, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑ The difference being I understand that in an 8-1 ruling the USSC is saying there can be bans on who can own a gun.
You're welcome. Thread fail.
I am going back to the bleachers.
*Huey » 04 Jul 2024, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑ 8-1. Doesn't matter.
If you need to confirm it you can do your own research, Cap Demando
If you will post the thread title, I'll help you connect the dots, SokraitsDoesn't matter.
Blackvegetable » 04 Jul 2024, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑ If you will post the thread title, I'll help you connect the dots, Sokraits
I told that to the IQ and race obsessed Ghetto.MR-7 » 04 Jul 2024, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑ He gloats a lot. He was bragging of how his daughter is half black and half polish and has a higher I Q then anyone on here. He sure is a proud daddy.
Let's stick to the objective facts which will render your claim of thread fail a hoax.*Huey » 04 Jul 2024, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑ Indont need any help. This thread is not about gun issues, which are not intellectually armed enough to participate Im. It is about a certain justice in particular. One you are afraid to name.
Let me know when that Justice hears a case where you believe there will be a conflict.
Now pass the salt.
So clearly stupid beyond belief.*Huey » 04 Jul 2024, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑ 8-1. Doesn't matter.
If you need to confirm it you can do your own research, Cap Demando
Try again. Unless his benefactor was involved in the case there is nothing to discuss. Someone told you to think this.Blackvegetable » 04 Jul 2024, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑ Let's stick to the objective facts which will render your claim of thread fail a hoax.
Your cowardly retreat from so doing makes my case.
Indont need any help. This thread is not about gun issues, which are not intellectually armed enough to participate Im. It is about a certain justice in particular. One you are afraid to name.
Let me know when that Justice hears a case where you believe there will be a conflict.
Now pass the salt.
I don’t need any help. This thread is not about gun issues, which are not intellectually armed enough to participate Im. It is about a certain justice in particular. One you are afraid to name.
Thread fail fail.*Huey » 04 Jul 2024, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑ I don’t need any help. This thread is not about gun issues, which are not intellectually armed enough to participate Im. It is about a certain justice in particular. One you are afraid to name.
Let me know when that Justice hears a case where you believe there will be a conflict.
Now pass the salt.
If you need more friction, talk to your groomer.Now pass the salt.
So utterly incapable of understanding the issues that you substitute your own and pretend to slay it.*Huey » 04 Jul 2024, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑ Try again. Unless his benefactor was involved in the case there is nothing to discuss. Someone told you to think this.
Blackvegetable » 04 Jul 2024, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑ Thread fail fail.
If you need more friction, talk to your groomer.
Blackvegetable » 04 Jul 2024, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ So utterly incapable of understanding the issues that you substitute your own and pretend to slay it.
You're utterly clueless..*Huey » 04 Jul 2024, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑ I'm good. Pass the butter. You are avoiding discussing Biden's and the Dem's problems with meaningless threads.