A shtetl is a small Jewish town or village in Eastern Europe, especially before World War II1. The word “shtetl” is Yiddish, and it means “little town”2. Shtetls were small market towns in Russia and Poland that shared a unique socio-cultural community pattern during the 19th and early 20th centuriesBlackvegetable » 04 Jul 2024, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑ I told that to the IQ and race obsessed Ghetto.
And it's not polish, it's shtetl jew.
Your claim has run from even stipulating to objective and unambigously relevant facts.
We weren't from Poland.MR-7 » 04 Jul 2024, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑ A shtetl is a small Jewish town or village in Eastern Europe, especially before World War II1. The word “shtetl” is Yiddish, and it means “little town”2. Shtetls were small market towns in Russia and Poland that shared a unique socio-cultural community pattern during the 19th and early 20th centuries
Thanks....this explains the height and shoe size....🤡
Blackvegetable » 04 Jul 2024, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑ Your claim has run from even stipulating to objective and unambigously relevant facts.
That's a thread fail fail.
You have to present a point. Let me know when you do.
So you yapped at an OP you don't understand, insisted it was about something it wasn't, declared "thread fail", then ran back to your Safe Space for more kinky stuff with your groomer.
ok, Russia.
Blackvegetable » 04 Jul 2024, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑ So you yapped at an OP you don't understand, insisted it was about something it wasn't, declared "thread fail", then ran back to your Safe Space for more kinky stuff with your groomer.
Now you want me to explain the matter to you.
This has nothing to do with Free Ride's self evident corruption.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!Blackvegetable » 04 Jul 2024, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑ What is it that you believe lower courts are unable to do?
Amuse me...
Try to formulate an argument.
Blackvegetable » 04 Jul 2024, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑ This has nothing to do with Free Ride's self evident corruption.
You've been debunked, explicitly.
Do you have anything else?
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!Blackvegetable » 04 Jul 2024, 7:51 am » wrote: ↑ Rubber/glue...
Damn, Rog....are you working with Trippie?
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!Blackvegetable » 04 Jul 2024, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑ If you will post the thread title, I'll help you connect the dots, Sokraits
Blackvegetable » 04 Jul 2024, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑ This has nothing to do with Free Ride's self evident corruption.
You've been debunked, explicitly.
Do you have anything else?
How can you "fail" a thread you insist is "ambiguous"?*Huey » 04 Jul 2024, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑ Quit avoiding taking a stand by being ambiguous. Your threads are like roulette wheels because you don't have the balls to take stand.
Consider that a spitball. Another reason why I am leaving the * in front of my screen name. So you can't drag me into your BS. I can pick and choose.
Speaking of being debunked, explicitly.
Blackvegetable » 04 Jul 2024, 6:42 am » wrote: ↑ Crawling artlessly from the wreckage of Bruen.
Supreme Court declines to hear a series of challenges to laws barring felons and drug users from having guns
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/02/politics ... reme-court
“At least for now, the court seems unwilling to jump right back into the messy fight that it touched off two years ago in the Bruen case with respect to exactly what the Second Amendment does and doesn’t prohibit,” said Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and professor at Georgetown University Law Center.
“But the punt here is necessarily temporary; lower courts are already bitterly divided over how they’re supposed to review a number of different state and federal gun control laws,” Vladeck added. “It’s a good bet that, before their next term is over, the justices are going to have to step back in.”
Inferior courts will TORTURE Free Ride. Bruen was composed by a child.
https://youtu.be/WrURe9s572I?si=FMH3-4O5M2eNP9Pv
Prediction: Vegas will have no idea what this is about, either.
Blackvegetable » 04 Jul 2024, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑ How can you "fail" a thread you insist is "ambiguous"?
You can't.
And we can be certain you won't tell us what is ambiguous about it.
You weren't dragged here, you came running....and tasted bootleather.
Note that I answer my own question before proceeding to deftly reunman you.