Why are you posting more data that you don't understand?*Huey » 05 Jul 2024, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑ The labor force participation rate changed little at 62.6 percent in June, and the employment-population ratio held at 60.1 percent. These measures showed little or no change over the year.
Nothing like more Americans working to get MAGAts stirred up.ConservativeWave » 05 Jul 2024, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑ ARE YOU KIDDING?
For the last YEAR, or more, every month "Job" numbers have been released by the Federal Government... AND THEN, revised DOWN !! It's gotten to the point where NO ONE believes ANY of the economic numbers being provided by Washington... BECAUSE they are BS !
I have come to the conclusion that the economic numbers provided by THIS Administration... as JUST MORE LIES !!
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/jobs- ... 3-8f3fcfc1
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/07/economy/ ... index.html
Watch...
Blackvegetable » 05 Jul 2024, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑ Why are you posting more data that you don't understand?
Still no case.Blackvegetable » 05 Jul 2024, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑ Watch...
What does U3 have to do with the number of Americans working?
My case is that you don't understand the numbers you spit out, 3.5.
Blackvegetable » 05 Jul 2024, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑ My case is that you don't understand the numbers you spit out, 3.5.
We both know this to be true.
You've offered no case and can't answer a simple question, 3.5.*Huey » 05 Jul 2024, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, you keep saying that. Waiting for you to prove it, PK.
Here are some numbers you would LOVE to ignore:Blackvegetable » 05 Jul 2024, 8:38 am » wrote: ↑ What point do you think you are making with those numbers?
Stop running from every question.
Only a dope like you would be happy about learning that of the 206,000 new jobs "created", 70,000 of them were to pay for a larger government bureaucracy, 34,000 went to education which were needed to school 10+ million new illegals, and 49,000 more were needed in the healthcare industry to cover the needs of the 10+ MILLION illegals who (unlike you) all get their healthcare for free, fully paid for by taxpayers. That leaves you with a mere 53,000 jobs that are actually worthwhile and NOT being paid by taxpayers. Making it even worse was the fact that 23,000 of them were for part-time workers.U.S. JOB GROWTH DOWN IN JUNE, UNEMPLOYMENT RISES TO 4.1%
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/june-job ... 24134.html
The unemployment rate rose to 4.1%, up from 4% in the month prior and the highest reading in almost three years. June's job additions were a slight decline from May, which saw job gains revised down on Friday to 218,000 from the 272,000 initially reported last month. Total revisions for April and May showed the US economy added 111,000 less jobs than initially reported."The June jobs report showed more signs of cooling in the labor market, with job growth including revisions weaker than expected, the unemployment rate rising and earnings growth slowing," Oxford Economics lead US economist Nancy Vanden Houten wrote in a note to clients. On Wednesday, the ADP Research Institute's National Employment Report showed 150,000 jobs were added to the private sector in June, a deceleration from the 157,000 job additions in May.
Meanwhile, data from the Department of Labor showed nearly 1.86 million continuing unemployment claims were filed in the week ending June 29, up from 1.83 million the week prior. This marked the ninth straight week where continuing claims have risen.Elsewhere in Friday's report, wage growth, an important measure for gauging inflation pressures, slowed to 3.9% year over year. On a monthly basis, wages increased 0.3%, a decrease from the previous month's 0.4% gain. The largest job increases in Friday's report were in government employment, which added 70,000 jobs in June. At the same time, healthcare employment added 49,000 jobs
Until you present a case with facts this is all you get. Nod.Blackvegetable » 05 Jul 2024, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑ You've offered no case and can't answer a simple question, 3.5.
Unless you can answer the question, anything else you spew isn't worth reading..Zeets2 » 05 Jul 2024, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑ Here are some numbers you would LOVE to ignore:
Only a dope like you would be happy about learning that of the 206,000 new jobs "created", 70,000 of them were to pay for a larger government bureaucracy, 34,000 went to education which were needed to school 10+ million new illegals, and 49,000 more were needed in the healthcare industry to cover the needs of the 10+ MILLION illegals who (unlike you) all get their healthcare for free, fully paid for by taxpayers. That leaves you with a mere 53,000 jobs that are actually worthwhile and NOT being paid by taxpayers. Making it even worse was the fact that 23,000 of them were for part-time workers.
All told, you're cheering like an idiot over a government report that actually added only 30,000 full-time jobs that will NOT be paid by taxpayers.
And just as it's been doing for the last couple of years, those numbers will more than likely be revised downward within the next several weeks.
What other conclusion can we draw from these facts, other than that you're a complete **** moron with zero understanding of economics?
I just did.*Huey » 05 Jul 2024, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑ Until you present a case with facts this is all you get. Nod.
Bob hooked me up with the spice package of the month club and I tell you the Chicken spice package was easy to prepare in the custom chicken cooking pan Bob supplied and my entire family had a nice time cooking and eating this delicious dish.
See BOB @socksavings in the WATER COOLER. Bob will do you no wrong! Invest in SOCK SAVINGS
@SOCK SAVINGS
Tiny,*Huey » 05 Jul 2024, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ Askholio, a question is not a case. No facts. Tell me what you think I don't understand, Creepo.
You know, if you pulled that 16 year **** down here someone would shoot you.
Blackvegetable » 05 Jul 2024, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
You've admitted why you run, like a little quimm, from my questions.
You say you "don't want to make my case"..
You posted a series of numbers the significance of which we both know you don't understand. It was accompanied by no case or argument.
There is ONE THING that goes along with "Good Jobs Data" that is required for it to MEAN anything... IS THAT... it NEEDS to be TRUE !Blackvegetable » 05 Jul 2024, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑ Nothing like more Americans working to get MAGAts stirred up.
Boy, do they hate America.
Runner #37x....Stay in your lane!*Huey » 05 Jul 2024, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑ Creepo, what did I tell you about ST....
Bob hooked me up with the spice package of the month club and I tell you the Chicken spice package was easy to prepare in the custom chicken cooking pan Bob supplied and my entire family had a nice time cooking and eating this delicious dish.
See BOB @socksavings in the WATER COOLER. Bob will do you no wrong! Invest in SOCK SAVINGS
@SOCK SAVINGS
What made this data any more reliable when it was less yuge?ConservativeWave » 05 Jul 2024, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ There is ONE THING that goes along with "Good Jobs Data" that is required for it to MEAN anything... IS THAT... it NEEDS to be TRUE !
HOWEVER... when you:
1) Take ALL the Jobs created by the Federal government ( 25%)... which are NOT REALLY an indication of economic health !
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/biden-ad ... c%20growth.
2) ALL the job losses by some of the biggest Companies in America (Apple, Amazon, & others) ! and
https://apnews.com/article/amazon-layof ... c5b5731688
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/apple-hiri ... y-layoffs/
3) Every month the Jobs numbers come out, and are revised DOWN... later
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/careers ... r-AA1jlasf
ALL OF THAT makes ME WONDER... How much of this is FACT.... and HOW MUCH is Democrat BULL $HIT ?
Question!Blackvegetable » 05 Jul 2024, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑ You've offered no case and can't answer a simple question, 3.5.