Liberal Forum

Vegas » 05 Jul 2024, 8:47 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Jul 2024, 8:47 pm

You incessantly demand others to repost **** from 5 minutes ago. You can't take what you dish out. 

That's not my problem. 

You lost. Again.

Not about me..

I did my part, without the ****.

You welshed, again.
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Jul 2024, 9:03 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Jul 2024, 9:03 pm

Not about me..

I did my part, without the ****.

You welshed, again.

I never said it was about you. 

You can't take what you dish out, that makes you a coward. 

Nope. I didn't welch. Never have. Post the numbers and I will answer. But **** your double standards.

Vegas » 05 Jul 2024, 9:37 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Jul 2024, 9:37 pm

I never said it was about you. 

You can't take what you dish out, that makes you a coward. 

Nope. I didn't welch. Never have. Post the numbers and I will answer. But **** your double standards.

17.5


17.2
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Jul 2024, 9:39 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Jul 2024, 9:39 pm

17.5

17.2

Obviously 17.5. Why do you waste your question on something self-evident? **** moron. 

My turn: Explain how taxpaying jobs don't help subsidize Biden's numbers.

I’m surprised @Blackvegetable hasn’t proffered this argument so I might as well.

The average American peon is overworked, overtaxed, and spends the bulk of his or her time rotating among eating, ****, commuting, working, **** on the webs, household chores, and doing otherwise meaningless and mind-**** tedious tasks.

If it so happens they end up working in GUBMINT jobs, which on average are less stressful and burdensome (workload wise) than private sector jobs, who cares?

Is the economy that much better if they go from pushing papers in some gubmint office position to working at restaurants, bookstores, hotels, auto centers, etc. within our otherwise glorious “service economy?”

Are any of those service jobs in a GROWTH sector, or are they all SATURATED?

All the manufacturing jobs are outsourced, white collar jobs are under heavy competition from outsourcing (which can be done easily by using remote-centered recruitment agencies for Filipinos, Polacks, and anyone else willing to work for 20-50% of standard American wages) and insourcing (H1B), and while there are pockets of demand in certain areas, there is no “tide is lifting all boats” right now.

I’m still very much AGAINST the narrative the economy is doing well (LOOK AT THE YIELD CURVE) - but complaining about gubmint jobs being all the jobs created is nonsense. 

Vegas » 05 Jul 2024, 8:47 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Jul 2024, 8:47 pm

You incessantly demand others to repost **** from 5 minutes ago. You can't take what you dish out. 

That's not my problem. 

You lost. Again.

How does anyone win, in a no win scenario of saving tomorrow, today being any rotation of the planet achieved past 5 billion years upto this one happening now?

Factual relative time is based on everyone believing tomorrow arrives zero hundred hours military time being the so called international dateline making 7 days a week,52 weeks a year factually matching each rotation of the planet living is a permanent situation of adapting to the moment for every lifetime occupying space this rotation as genetically part of the numbers left alive today.

Pick any day on a calendar and with your watch or clock AM is midnight to noon tomorrow, and PM is second half of today folding ideas into continuing resolutions of people believing life isn't self evident time being alive as evolving uniquely here each rotation of the planet ada[pting to live since arriving a fertilized cell that in thermodynamics is just another added changing form never same total sum twice.

I can use history to debunk the corruption established every generation since dawn of civilization began practicing ideas life exceeds adapting as displaced since conception of relative time governing outcomes of everyone living this rotation. The original sin created the final conflict about to reach fruition in this decade people saving humanity's concept tomorrow is possible.

What have you been willing to do to keep the idea alive live exceeds adapting here genetically eternally separated every rotation becomes today in the life of ada[pting here now.

100% accurate beyond all reasonable doubts pledging complete obedience to the idea life cannot be limited to adapting here so far.

Again, tomorrow is factually midnight to noon and today's second half is noon to midnight. What happens to a physical yesterday factually.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BSByOeew1rU

Vegas » 05 Jul 2024, 9:40 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Jul 2024, 9:40 pm

Obviously 17.5. Why do you waste your question on something self-evident? **** moron. 

My turn: Explain how taxpaying jobs don't help subsidize Biden's numbers.

Shut your ignorant face.

Under Grifty, there were 17.5 gubmint employees perr 100 private sector employees.

Under Biden it is 17.2.

What does that tell you about  "subsidized" (what a **** idiot) job numbers?


Level 0.27 *******.
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Jul 2024, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Jul 2024, 12:55 pm

We've exhausted your understanding.

Is that a quote from Brown?
 

ROG62 » 06 Jul 2024, 6:56 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2024, 6:56 am

Is that a quote from Brown?

How weak can this **** get?
 

Blackvegetable » 06 Jul 2024, 6:58 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2024, 6:58 am

How weak can this **** get?

No questions, dick sucker. 

Blackvegetable » 05 Jul 2024, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Jul 2024, 4:19 pm

Thread discipline, Melty.

Try to break your streak...answer a question.

19 did nothing last night to quell those who are concerned.  Read some CNN this morning.  YHOU are ****.  YOU are not smart enough to see it.

*Huey » 06 Jul 2024, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2024, 8:42 am

19 did nothing last night to quell those who are concerned.  Read some CNN this morning.  YHOU are ****.  YOU are not smart enough to see it.

Too much coffee?

Blackvegetable » 06 Jul 2024, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2024, 8:50 am

Too much coffee?

Good Morning Liar.  How are you today?  I see you got strike thru already warmed up.  I guess If I had no thoughts or ideas I would have to use it as well.

Liar, right now it is only 39 minutes, Salem to Boston.  Less than my drive to work.

*Huey » 06 Jul 2024, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2024, 8:52 am

Good Morning Liar.  How are you today?  I see you got strike thru already warmed up.  I guess If I had no thoughts or ideas I would have to use it as well.

Liar, right now it is only 39 minutes, Salem to Boston.  Less than my drive to work.

Bad open.

Poor thread discipline.

I assume The Five doesn't do Policy..

Blackvegetable » 06 Jul 2024, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2024, 8:54 am

Bad open.

Poor thread discipline.

I assume The Five doesn't do Policy..

Liar, I have fun laughing at you.  You got nothing.  Did you see what the Judge and Jesse had to say yesterday about Biden and interview on the five?

 

*Huey » 05 Jul 2024, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Jul 2024, 4:17 pm

Like you were asked to meet me in Boston, not Braintree.

Yeah, I stipulate to that.

Liar, I'm out for the night.  I look forward to embarrassing you and humiliating you further tomorrow.

@Blackvegetable  

First sentence is all the objective fact that is needed.

Blackvegetable » 06 Jul 2024, 6:06 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2024, 6:06 am

What does that tell you about  "subsidized" (what a **** idiot) job numbers?


 

It tells me two things: 
1. You are deflecting because you have TDS
2. That it is completely irrelevant to whether or not 25% of Biden's numbers are subsidized...the one that you are bragging about. 

My turn: Sustainable jobs, not just immediate job creation, are more important. Most jobs that drive the economy are 1. Healthcare 2. Technology 3. Construction 4. Retail and 5. Non-durable manufacturing. 

Post the numbers of Biden's jobs that fall within these categories. 


1. Refer to Trump again. 

 

Vegas » 06 Jul 2024, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2024, 9:55 am

It tells me two things: 
1. You are deflecting because you have TDS
2. That it is completely irrelevant to whether or not 25% of Biden's numbers are subsidized...the one that you are bragging about. 

My turn: Sustainable jobs, not just immediate job creation, are more important. Most jobs that drive the economy are 1. Healthcare 2. Technology 3. Construction 4. Retail and 5. Non-durable manufacturing. 

Post the numbers of Biden's jobs that fall within these categories. 

1. Refer to Trump again.

No....I think it far more appropriate that you answer my questions, as you are a moron.

Is a larger or smaller percentage of the total workforce working in gubmint under Biden than under He Against Whom No One May Ever Be Compared

I defeated Medicare....And no soldier has died under my leadership..

LowIQTrash » 05 Jul 2024, 10:27 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Jul 2024, 10:27 pm

I’m surprised @Blackvegetable hasn’t proffered this argument so I might as well.

The average American peon is overworked, overtaxed, and spends the bulk of his or her time rotating among eating, ****, commuting, working, **** on the webs, household chores, and doing otherwise meaningless and mind-**** tedious tasks.

If it so happens they end up working in GUBMINT jobs, which on average are less stressful and burdensome (workload wise) than private sector jobs, who cares?

Is the economy that much better if they go from pushing papers in some gubmint office position to working at restaurants, bookstores, hotels, auto centers, etc. within our otherwise glorious “service economy?”

Are any of those service jobs in a GROWTH sector, or are they all SATURATED?

All the manufacturing jobs are outsourced, white collar jobs are under heavy competition from outsourcing (which can be done easily by using remote-centered recruitment agencies for Filipinos, Polacks, and anyone else willing to work for 20-50% of standard American wages) and insourcing (H1B), and while there are pockets of demand in certain areas, there is no “tide is lifting all boats” right now.

I’m still very much AGAINST the narrative the economy is doing well (LOOK AT THE YIELD CURVE) - but complaining about gubmint jobs being all the jobs created is nonsense.

Well now what's the usual ratio of government workers to private sector workers overall...?
No way could it be close to the 25% of new jobs claimed here
I would guess it  takes  no more than 2 government workers per 100 private sector workers to keep the lights on , the free meals for the ****** and the SS checks flowing...?
Then I looked it up....List of countries by public sector size - Wikipedia
ratio of government employees to population - Search (bing.com)
There are who knows how many government offices  I have visited where they have   2 low performance Affirmative Action ****** doing the work of 1 much better qualified, friendly, dependable, much less smelly and  more efficient White Person....