Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2024, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2024, 8:42 am

Unless it is repeating the reasons for your cowardice.

And yes, your memory sucks.

You suck in a more physical way, Vacuum Lips. 

*Huey » 31 Jul 2024, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2024, 8:44 am

Shrug.

You act like you just fell out of the coconut tree.

Were that true, I'd fall for the "already did" dodge.

RebelGator » 31 Jul 2024, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2024, 8:46 am

You suck in a more physical way, Vacuum Lips.

You appear fluent in some code.

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2024, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2024, 8:34 am

You can juice potatoes with that hand?

I’m the master of my domain 

Blackvegetable » 05 Jul 2024, 6:06 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Jul 2024, 6:06 pm

Sure....but I'll be the judge of "many".

.

Actually, it shouldn't matter. You claimed that I couldn't come up with names of my sources. It had nothing to do with how many. 

I can repost your claim to that. 

You still want to take off a month? Let's do it.

*Vegas » 31 Jul 2024, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2024, 2:57 pm

Actually, it shouldn't matter. You claimed that I couldn't come up with names of my sources. It had nothing to do with how many. 

I can repost your claim to that. 

You still want to take off a month? Let's do it.

Then all I have to do is show ONE example of you not doing so....and you have to take 3 months off.

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2024, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2024, 7:34 am

**** off with the stupid.

This is where the fundies are told to sit down, shut up, and like it.

Let's hope those dumb rubes sit this one out.

Fact are inconvenient when you’re stupid, stupid.
 

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2024, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2024, 3:01 pm

Then all I have to do is show ONE example of you not doing so....and you have to take 3 months off.

How the **** do you come up with that logic? You made a claim, I can prove you are full of ****. 

That simple. 

 

Buck Naked » 31 Jul 2024, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2024, 9:30 am

I’m the master of my domain 

You mastered ignoring why you exist in plain sight needing social consensus to validate who you think you been since conceived. Since birth humanity has educated you life is a mystery tour cradle to grave because you never accepted the 0-9 months prior to birth you transformed from a single cell to an infant changed form daily to the shape you are occupying space with today, never same results twice since birth in parallel time as siblings, cousins, parents, aunts, uncles, 2nd cousins, post generation gap of your 4 grandparents and their siblings and cousins came after great grandparents siblings and cousins.

Gee you starting to notice all the things you believe true were nothing more than speculation life could have existed any other way than personally evolving so far.

Intellectual retardation of a genetic brain always navigating time adapting here so far uniquely here womb to current social behavior.

Besure to down vote my post.

31stArrival » 31 Jul 2024, 3:04 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2024, 3:04 pm

You mastered ignoring why you exist in plain sight needing social consensus to validate who you think you been since conceived. Since birth humanity has educated you life is a mystery tour cradle to grave because you never accepted the 0-9 months prior to birth you transformed from a single cell to an infant changed form daily to the shape you are occupying space with today, never same results twice since birth in parallel time as siblings, cousins, parents, aunts, uncles, 2nd cousins, post generation gap of your 4 grandparents and their siblings and cousins came after great grandparents siblings and cousins.

Gee you starting to notice all the things you believe true were nothing more than speculation life could have existed any other way than personally evolving so far.

Intellectual retardation of a genetic brain always navigating time adapting here so far uniquely here womb to current social behavior.

Besure to down vote my post.

Why would I do that?
 

Buck Naked » 31 Jul 2024, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2024, 3:21 pm

Why would I do that?
 

Gee you are smart enough to know if you did, you admitted how accurate I was about your role playing career cradle to grave choices done so far. Now you are still shielded by reasonable doubt and every alternate reality on stage.

31stArrival » 31 Jul 2024, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2024, 3:31 pm

Gee you are smart enough to know if you did, you admitted how accurate I was about your role playing career cradle to grave choices done so far.

I did?

Buck Naked » 31 Jul 2024, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2024, 3:32 pm

I did?

absolutely beyond socially compromised doubt recorded in history of how human behavior was directed so far by context directing content of population to stage every social order on the books today justifying faith daily rules beliefs life isn't self evident.

Some of the internet’s most influential far-right figures are turning against former president Donald Trump’s campaign, threatening a digital “war” against the Republican candidate’s aides and allies that could complicate the party’s calls for unity in the final weeks of the presidential race.

 Nick Fuentes, a white supremacist and podcaster who dined with Trump at his Palm Beach resort Mar-a-Lago in 2022, said on X that Trump’s campaign was “blowing it” by not positioning itself more to the right and was “headed for a catastrophic loss,” in a post that by Wednesday had been viewed 2.6 million times.

 Laura Loomer, a far-right activist whom Trump last year called “very special,” said his “weak” surrogates had unraveled his momentum and that his approach “needs to change FAST because we can’t talk about a stolen election for another 4 years,” in an X post that was “liked” more than 8,000 times.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technolo ... criticism/

 Lay down with sheep, wake up with Scrapie...

 

Blackvegetable » 15 Jul 2024, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jul 2024, 12:00 pm

What "Pissing contest"?

NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
 

Blackvegetable » 18 Aug 2024, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2024, 11:11 am

Some of the internet’s most influential far-right figures are turning against former president Donald Trump’s campaign, threatening a digital “war” against the Republican candidate’s aides and allies that could complicate the party’s calls for unity in the final weeks of the presidential race.

 Nick Fuentes, a white supremacist and podcaster who dined with Trump at his Palm Beach resort Mar-a-Lago in 2022, said on X that Trump’s campaign was “blowing it” by not positioning itself more to the right and was “headed for a catastrophic loss,” in a post that by Wednesday had been viewed 2.6 million times.

 Laura Loomer, a far-right activist whom Trump last year called “very special,” said his “weak” surrogates had unraveled his momentum and that his approach “needs to change FAST because we can’t talk about a stolen election for another 4 years,” in an X post that was “liked” more than 8,000 times.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technolo ... criticism/

 Lay down with sheep, wake up with Scrapie...

"Most influential".......By whom?

 
 

Majik » 18 Aug 2024, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2024, 12:15 pm

"Most influential".......By whom?

 
 

the faithfully obedient of course.

Former President Donald Trump gave his clearest answer to date on the federal regulation of abortion pills, and it’s not what conservatives wanted to hear.
 After months of avoiding specifics, Trump told CBS News on Monday that he would not use the 150-year-old Comstock Act to ban mail delivery of the drugs if elected in November, adding: “The federal government should have nothing to do with this issue.”

 Many prominent conservatives and anti-abortion activists were outraged by the remark, calling it “nonsensical” and “cowardly,” and warning that it could dampen turnout and enthusiasm on the right heading into a close election.

 “It is not a pro-life position, it’s not an acceptable position, and it does not provide the contrast on this issue to the degree that we have had in the past between him and Kamala Harris,” said Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council. “What President Trump is doing is suppressing his own support.”

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/2 ... t-00175068

Let the **** Rat Hunger Games commence!

Blackvegetable » 22 Aug 2024, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2024, 9:21 am

Former President Donald Trump gave his clearest answer to date on the federal regulation of abortion pills, and it’s not what conservatives wanted to hear.
 After months of avoiding specifics, Trump told CBS News on Monday that he would not use the 150-year-old Comstock Act to ban mail delivery of the drugs if elected in November, adding: “The federal government should have nothing to do with this issue.”

 Many prominent conservatives and anti-abortion activists were outraged by the remark, calling it “nonsensical” and “cowardly,” and warning that it could dampen turnout and enthusiasm on the right heading into a close election.

 “It is not a pro-life position, it’s not an acceptable position, and it does not provide the contrast on this issue to the degree that we have had in the past between him and Kamala Harris,” said Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council. “What President Trump is doing is suppressing his own support.”

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/2 ... t-00175068

Let the **** Rat Hunger Games commence!

Thanks.  That is not very "project 2025".  Goes along with his abortion stance.  

*Huey » 22 Aug 2024, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2024, 9:34 am

Thanks.  That is not very "project 2025".  Goes along with his abortion stance.

Post the thread title.