*Huey » 10 Jul 2024, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑ I am waiting for you to post what he has said in the past. Convince me.
maineman » 10 Jul 2024, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑ Why would I feel compelled to convince YOU of anything? The fact remains: the authors of the document are overwhelmingly former Trump staffers and advisors. If you choose to believe they created that entire document about how they would remold the US Government in 2025 without consulting the guy who would be driving that train, go right ahead, Sarge. Macht nichts. Willful ignorance is undeniably your strong suit. Lead with it.
*Huey » 10 Jul 2024, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑ So you don't have any Trump comments that contradict what I posted. You are just spreading the propaganda that your groomers are telling you to spread.
This isn't a matter of convincing me of something. It is a matter of you backing up your assertions with facts. Fact you can't provide.
Project 2025 never heard of it never received anything from them know nuttin bout them kinda like the black congressional caucusmaineman » 10 Jul 2024, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑ Nearly all of the authors of Project 2025 are former Trump aides and advisors, and the project provides a blueprint for Trump's second term and you want to believe that Trump knew nothing of it?![]()
![]()
That is more than stupidity; it is willful ignorance. You ARE dismissed, sarge. Get out of my office. Now.
maineman » 10 Jul 2024, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑ @Z 09 (aka @BooRadleydoxxed me, and I promised myself never to engage that skanky **** ever again.
AND. I. WON'T.
BuckNaked » 10 Jul 2024, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑ Project 2025 never heard of it never received anything from them know nuttin bout them kinda like the black congressional caucus
doxxed
There is no such thing as gay marriagemaineman » 10 Jul 2024, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑ IMO, Democratic voters will hold their noses and vote for WHOEVER is on top of the Democratic ticket in order to keep Project 2025 and a reascendant Donald Trump from happening. IMO, large numbers of WOMEN voters across the ideological spectrum will similarly hold their noses and vote for the Democrat to keep America from turning into a pro-life real-life Handmaid's Tale. Dobbs has been an albatross around the GOP's neck since the day it was passed, and Democrats fully intend to keep it chained there Project 2025 seeks to ban mifepristone, reverse gay marriage, reinstitute the ban on transgender service in the military... those are all issues that are PROVEN to drive up democratic turnout.
But who really knows? We can sit here and argue on an obscure internet message board, but we won't really know until the votes are counted in November. I would remind you that, a little more than a week ago, Marine Le Pen was pretty cocky herself. Beware of counting your chickens, if you get my drift.
maineman » 10 Jul 2024, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑ My assertion is that this is a plan for how the government will change after a Trump victory written by Trump confidants. If you choose to believe that they did so while keeping him completely out of the loop, go for it. I really don't care. You do you.
*Huey » 10 Jul 2024, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm good. Since you have no proof, and I do, we will have to wait until he is elected to find out. If he does nothing with those ideas than we know you are lying.
maineman » 10 Jul 2024, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Is English your second language? Do you even understand what the meaning of the word, "lying" is?
I am not wrong about the identity of the authors of Project 2025. I am not wrong about their past connection to Donald Trump. I assert that, IMHO, there is no possible way that they would create a detailed plan for how the second term of their former boss would play out and keep him out of the loop. If I am wrong, I am WRONG. Being wrong does not make one a liar.
Run along now and find some other pin to count the dancing angels on. I'm off to the beach.
Maineman claims I've been stalking him for years.
I certainly have never tried to "debunk" the fact that he is now trying to distance himself from Project 2025. I get that. I have never tried to disabuse you of your blind loyalty to him and your complete acceptance of this position. I merely point out that if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck it is USUALLY a duck. If you want to believe that, fine. I chose not to.*Huey » 10 Jul 2024, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you understand what provide proof means?
I hate to do this to you but I have said you are lying about the authors so I am going to line that out. This is about what I posted Trump said. You can't debunk.
**** off your diverty crap.
maineman » 10 Jul 2024, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑ I certainly have never tried to "debunk" the fact that he is now trying to distance himself from Project 2025. I get that. I have never tried to disabuse you of your blind loyalty to him and your complete acceptance of this position. I merely point out that if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck it is USUALLY a duck. If you want to believe that, fine. I chose not to.
Truth be told, what is being said? Honest accounting of reproductions living eternally separated by genetics placing population in series parallel time adapting as ancestral lineages become 5 separate generation gaps per ancestral lineage arriving at the 8 billion sole displacements occupying time today?maineman » 10 Jul 2024, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Is English your second language? Do you even understand what the meaning of the word, "lying" is?
I am not wrong about the identity of the authors of Project 2025. I am not wrong about their past connection to Donald Trump. I assert that, IMHO, there is no possible way that they would create a detailed plan for how the second term of their former boss would play out and keep him out of the loop. If I am wrong, I am WRONG. Being wrong does not make one a liar.
Run along now and find some other pin to count the dancing angels on. I'm off to the beach.
Exactly let’s allow it to play out no since guessing what he will do. First step is win on 11/5*Huey » 10 Jul 2024, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm good. Since you have no proof, and I do, we will have to wait until he is elected to find out. If he does nothing with those ideas than we know you are lying.
BuckNaked » 10 Jul 2024, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Exactly let’s allow it to play out no since guessing what he will do. First step is win on 11/5