Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2024, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2024, 9:59 am

I see no reason why they should.

Can you offer a case for so doing?

Biden plans to "bring transparency and truth back to the government to share the truth, even when it's hard to hear," she said.

https://www.reuters.com/article/busines ... KBN29Q08S/

*Huey » 09 Jul 2024, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2024, 1:52 pm

Biden plans to "bring transparency and truth back to the government to share the truth, even when it's hard to hear," she said.

https://www.reuters.com/article/busines ... KBN29Q08S/

Can you just go direct to "point"?

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2024, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2024, 1:53 pm

Can you just go direct to "point"?

I am waiting for you to do so.

You asked what reason should the tapes be released.  The WH claimed back in 2021 that they will be transparent.  I posted Psaki's words from Jan 20 of that year that the WH will be transparent no matter how hard it may be.

Well, the American People, the Press, and members of Congress are questioning his fitness for the job.  This a piece of the puzzle considering the Justice Department agreed that Biden is not mentally fit enough to stand trial.

 

*Huey » 09 Jul 2024, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2024, 1:56 pm

I am waiting for you to do so.

You asked what reason should the tapes be released.  The WH claimed back in 2021 that they will be transparent.  I posted Psaki's words from Jan 20 of that year that the WH will be transparent no matter how hard it may be.

Well, the American People, the Press, and members of Congress are questioning his fitness for the job.  This a piece of the puzzle considering the Justice Department agreed that Biden is not mentally fit enough to stand trial.

You keep coming back to "fitness"..

But we can't talk about whether he is "fitter" than the other guy.

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2024, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2024, 2:10 pm

You keep coming back to "fitness"..

But we can't talk about whether he is "fitter" than the other guy.

**** JOE BIDEN

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2024, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2024, 2:10 pm

You keep coming back to "fitness"..

But we can't talk about whether he is "fitter" than the other guy.

Yes, we are talking about mental fitness.  Read the OP you are afraid to discuss:

If Biden is mentally stable they should release the Hur tapes and prove it.

Yes, you certainly can disucuss on.  TO quote YOU, start a thread.  But I will give you this.  The "there guy" was not deemed mentally unfit to stand trial.      Biden was, by his own justice department.

*Huey » 09 Jul 2024, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2024, 2:48 pm

Yes, we are talking about mental fitness.  Read the OP you are afraid to discuss:

Yes, you certainly can disucuss on.  TO quote YOU, start a thread.  But I will give you this.  The "there guy" was not deemed mentally unfit to stand trial.   mg:   Biden was, by his own justice department.

So this is just aimless toadying?

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2024, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2024, 2:57 pm

So this is just aimless toadying?

You chose to enter the thread.  Now you wish to take it over.  You have yet to explain why you think they should not be released.

*Huey » 09 Jul 2024, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2024, 3:02 pm

You chose to enter the thread.  Now you wish to take it over.  You have yet to explain why you think they should not be released.

There's only one reason you believe they should be....I don't agree with that reason.

*Huey » 09 Jul 2024, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2024, 2:48 pm

Yes, we are talking about mental fitness.  Read the OP you are afraid to discuss:

Yes, you certainly can disucuss on.  TO quote YOU, start a thread.  But I will give you this.  The "there guy" was not deemed mentally unfit to stand trial.   mg:   Biden was, by his own justice department.

Ok...on the topic of "fitness" - to whatever degree Biden may be compromised he remains a far superior alternative to a rapist felon lunatic whose performance in office was epically awful.

Is that clear enough now.

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2024, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2024, 3:29 pm

There's only one reason you believe they should be....I don't agree with that reason.

You don't believe they should be because it will only verify what your media and politicians are now saying about him and it will validate what Hur said.  You can't have that. So I take it this is a case where you support someone bing in contempt of congress.

We already know what was said because the transcripts were released.  So there is only ONE reason not to release the tapes.

*Huey » 09 Jul 2024, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2024, 3:33 pm

You don't believe they should be because it will only verify what your media and politicians are now saying about him and it will validate what Hur said. You can't have that. So I take it this is a case where you support someone bing in contempt of congress.

We already know what was said because the transcripts were released.  So there is only ONE reason not to release the tapes.

Why do you insist on rewriting my direct answer?

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2024, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2024, 3:38 pm

Why do you insist on rewriting my direct answer?

Try again, Trigger.

You don't believe they should be because it will only verify what your media and politicians are now saying about him and it will validate what Hur said. You can't have that. So I take it this is a case where you support someone bing in contempt of congress.

We already know what was said because the transcripts were released.  So there is only ONE reason not to release the tapes.

*Huey » 09 Jul 2024, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2024, 3:41 pm

Try again, Trigger.

You don't believe they should be because it will only verify what your media and politicians are now saying about him and it will validate what Hur said. You can't have that. So I take it this is a case where you support someone bing in contempt of congress.

We already know what was said because the transcripts were released.  So there is only ONE reason not to release the tapes.

You know what your rules are about your words....from which you run in every context.

I do not answer to your interpretation of my argument, Controlly. 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2024, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2024, 3:46 pm

You know what your rules are about your words....from which you run in every context.

I do not answer to your interpretation of my argument, Controlly.

NoStands, you refuse to make an argument.  And wait for it concerning running from words.

Try again, Trigger.

You don't believe they should be because it will only verify what your media and politicians are now saying about him and it will validate what Hur said. You can't have that. So I take it this is a case where you support someone bing in contempt of congress.

We already know what was said because the transcripts were released.  So there is only ONE reason not to release the tapes.
 

@Blackvegetable  

If he is mentally fit releasing the Hur tapes will vindicate you, the WH, Jill Biden, and Joe.  What are you afraid of?

@Blackvegetable  

I guess you left to get your daily dose of real news at the gym.  Good Job.

Blackvegetable » 08 Jul 2024, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2024, 1:37 pm

Does the other guy still insist he won in 2020?

NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2024, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2024, 9:59 am

I see no reason why they should.

Can you offer a case for so doing?

NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif

 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2024, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2024, 1:53 pm

Can you just go direct to "point"?

NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif