Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 10 Jul 2024, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 8:42 am

I believe Joe ranks #19..

One place behind Ronald Reagan. 

Grifty is down somewhere in the bowels.

**** JOE BIDEN
​​​​​​​

Blackvegetable » 10 Jul 2024, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 8:42 am

I believe Joe ranks #19..

One place behind Ronald Reagan. 

Grifty is down somewhere in the bowels.

How long do you plan to continue banking on your phony liberal "best of" list, as if it were relevant to anything you liberal idiots are facing today?
Or is it just that you still have nothing of value to support Biden with?
 

Blackvegetable » 10 Jul 2024, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 8:41 am

About what?

You are obviously of the opinion that Biden is mentally fit to perform the duties as President, and is healthy enough to complete 4 more years in office.

Your sources and your politicians are to so sure about that.  And don't forget his own Justice Department deemed not mentally competent to stand trial.

*Huey » 10 Jul 2024, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 9:12 am

You are obviously of the opinion that Biden is mentally fit to perform the duties as President, and is healthy enough to complete 4 more years in office.

Your sources and your politicians are to so sure about that.  And don't forget his own Justice Department deemed not mentally competent to stand trial.

You could ASK me, but then you'd have to answer in payment,  and you can't do that..

Your sources and your politicians are to so sure about that.  And don't forget his own Justice Department deemed not mentally competent to stand trial.

Day 1.

Blackvegetable » 10 Jul 2024, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 9:28 am

You could ASK me, but then you'd have to answer in payment,  and you can't do that..

Day 1.

I answer you all the time.  I don't owe anything.  And I have asked you and you refuse to answer.  

Stop lying Daddy's lil Princes.  Stop being the Boston Coward.

You are obviously of the opinion that Biden is mentally fit to perform the duties as President, and is healthy enough to complete 4 more years in office.

Your sources and your politicians are to so sure about that.  And don't forget his own Justice Department deemed not mentally competent to stand trial.

 

Zeets2 » 10 Jul 2024, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 8:55 am

How long do you plan to continue banking on your phony liberal "best of" list, as if it were relevant to anything you liberal idiots are facing today?
Or is it just that you still have nothing of value to support Biden with?

Zeet,

You watch FOX.

These people aren't too ashamed to name their undergraduate institutions.
 

*Huey » 10 Jul 2024, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 9:29 am

I answer you all the time.  I don't owe anything.  And I have asked you and you refuse to answer.  

Stop lying Daddy's lil Princes.  Stop being the Boston Coward.

You are obviously of the opinion that Biden is mentally fit to perform the duties as President, and is healthy enough to complete 4 more years in office.

Your sources and your politicians are to so sure about that.  And don't forget his own Justice Department deemed not mentally competent to stand trial.

Noooo, Tiny.

I will answer your question,  after which you will answer mine.

Deal?

Blackvegetable » 10 Jul 2024, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 9:31 am

Noooo, Tiny.

I will answer your question,  after which you will answer mine.

Deal?

You answer first.   Deal.  Is Biden mentally competent to perform the duties of the President and is he healthy enough to complete 4 more years?

I answer you all the time.  I don't owe anything.  And I have asked you and you refuse to answer.  

Stop lying Daddy's lil Princes.  Stop being the Boston Coward.

You are obviously of the opinion that Biden is mentally fit to perform the duties as President, and is healthy enough to complete 4 more years in office.

Your sources and your politicians are to so sure about that.  And don't forget his own Justice Department deemed not mentally competent to stand trial.

 

*Huey » 10 Jul 2024, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 9:33 am

You answer first.   Deal.  Is Biden mentally competent to perform the duties of the President and is he healthy enough to complete 4 more years?

I answer you all the time.  I don't owe anything.  And I have asked you and you refuse to answer.  

Stop lying Daddy's lil Princes.  Stop being the Boston Coward.

You are obviously of the opinion that Biden is mentally fit to perform the duties as President, and is healthy enough to complete 4 more years in office.

Your sources and your politicians are to so sure about that.  And don't forget his own Justice Department deemed not mentally competent to stand trial.

I answer you all the time. 

Let's first dispense with this...

Are these your words?

I have disputed objective fact.

At this point I believe the response is hysterical. A man nearing his 80s won't be on every day...I also think it safe to say neither of us don't stays up much past 9 pm.

In leading his administration, Biden has done a very good job...unless other members thereof call for the 25th, I see no reason to remove him. To leave no doubt, yes - I believe he remains fit for the office.

Whether or not he makes through the entire term is not a matter of concern, either. Should Harris succeed him, she'll bring her hubby with her. He is a far superior choice of advisor than the bootspittles with which Grifty was inclined to surround himself.


Clear enough?

Ready to choke on the boot now?

Blackvegetable » 10 Jul 2024, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 9:51 am

Let's first dispense with this...

Are these your words?

At this point I believe the response is hysterical. A man nearing his 80s won't be on every day...I also think it safe to say neither of us don't stays up much past 9 pm.

In leading his administration, Biden has done a very good job...unless other members thereof call for the 25th, I see no reason to remove him. To leave no doubt, yes - I believe he remains fit for the office.

Whether or not he makes through the entire term is not a matter of concern, either. Should Harris succeed him, she'll bring her hubby with her. He is a far superior choice of advisor than the bootspittles with which Grifty was inclined to surround himself.

Clear enough?

Ready to choke on the boot now?

That is what I expect a Toady to say.  Now go convince your sources and Politicians.  And I was correct to chalk up as a Yes to the question,

Are those my words?  Yup.  BUT it is typo or mistype.  If you were man enough to provide a link to provide context it is quite obvious I meant to say 

I have NOT disputed objective fact.

You got your answer.  

Blackvegetable » 10 Jul 2024, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 9:30 am

Zeet,

You watch FOX.

These people aren't too ashamed to name their undergraduate institutions.

Oh, the HORROR!!!    

You dumb libs sure are desperate, aren't you?      
 

Blackvegetable » 10 Jul 2024, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 9:30 am

Zeet,

You watch FOX.

These people aren't too ashamed to name their undergraduate institutions.

You should watch some FOX.  It appears they are saying the same about this as FOX.  CNN, MSNBC, and FOX are on the same page.

And it is not the same page you are on.

*Huey » 10 Jul 2024, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 10:23 am

You should watch some FOX.  It appears they are saying the same about this as FOX.  CNN, MSNBC, and FOX are on the same page.

And it is not the same page you are on.

What separates being on the same page(scripted social behavior) as adapting in life same rotation(occupying space now) on the planet at the same time.

Although he was somewhat ok last night he stumbled a bit and he was reading straight from the teleprompter. He did read stage instructions:


Mr Biden read "ask the military to come forward", a direction, and not a part of his speech, after announcing that he would award Jens Stoltenberg, the Secretary-General of Nato, the Presidential Medal of Freedom.


The president’s eyes were locked to the teleprompter as he addressed Mr Stoltenberg, who appeared on stage as Mr Biden introduced America’s highest civilian honour.



https://www.gbnews.com/politics/us/joe- ... ato-speech

*Huey » 10 Jul 2024, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 9:56 am

That is what I expect a Toady to say.  Now go convince your sources and Politicians.  And I was correct to chalk up as a Yes to the question,

Are those my words?  Yup.  BUT it is typo or mistype.  If you were man enough to provide a link to provide context it is quite obvious I meant to say 

You got your answer.

Oh, nooooooooo...

You've been going on about "fitness for office"....

Item: 

• Eleven former chiefs of staff took Priebus to lunch a month before Trump's inauguration: "Most of the former chiefs believed Trump was intellectually and temperamentally unfit for office — and few thought Priebus could rein him in or tell him hard truths."

https://www.axios.com/2018/02/15/reince ... f-of-staff

Item:

After Voting To Acquit, McConnell Torches Trump As Responsible For Riot

https://www.npr.org/sections/trump-impe ... ble-for-ri

Item:

It’s up to the Justice Department to decide if this is a crime. But as a matter of principle, as a matter of character, Trump has proven himself unworthy to be this country’s chief executive again.

https://nypost.com/2022/07/22/trumps-ja ... eelection/

Item:

Trump proven unfit for power again

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opin ... wer-again/

Item:

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll

Item:

Donald Trump convicted on 34 felony counts for falsifying business records in historic Manhattan hush money case

https://nypost.com/2024/05/30/us-news/d ... oney-case/

 At which point did your faith in Grifty's fitness for office waver?
 

*Huey » 10 Jul 2024, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 10:23 am

You should watch some FOX.  It appears they are saying the same about this as FOX.  CNN, MSNBC, and FOX are on the same page.

And it is not the same page you are on.

Save your breath for your runny thing...

Zeets2 » 10 Jul 2024, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 10:18 am

Oh, the HORROR!!!    

You dumb libs sure are desperate, aren't you?    

I'm not the one still clinging to the FOX tit.

Blackvegetable » 10 Jul 2024, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 10:44 am

Oh, nooooooooo...

You've been going on about "fitness for office"....

 Item: 

• Eleven former chiefs of staff took Priebus to lunch a month before Trump's inauguration: "Most of the former chiefs believed Trump was intellectually and temperamentally unfit for office — and few thought Priebus could rein him in or tell him hard truths."

https://www.axios.com/2018/02/15/reince ... f-of-staff

Item:

After Voting To Acquit, McConnell Torches Trump As Responsible For Riot

https://www.npr.org/sections/trump-impe ... ble-for-ri

Item:

It’s up to the Justice Department to decide if this is a crime. But as a matter of principle, as a matter of character, Trump has proven himself unworthy to be this country’s chief executive again.

https://nypost.com/2022/07/22/trumps-ja ... eelection/

Item:

Trump proven unfit for power again

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opin ... wer-again/

Item:

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll

Item:

Donald Trump convicted on 34 felony counts for falsifying business records in historic Manhattan hush money case

https://nypost.com/2024/05/30/us-news/d ... oney-case/

 At which point did your faith in Grifty's fitness for office waver? 

If you wish to discuss Trump you are welcome to start a thread.  There was nothing in the questions deal that said you get to take control of the thread.
 

Blackvegetable » 10 Jul 2024, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 10:45 am

Save your breath for your runny thing...

 haven't ran at all.  YOU are running from your sources and politicians.  

 

*Huey » 10 Jul 2024, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 10:47 am

If you wish to discuss Trump you are welcome to start a thread.  There was nothing in the questions deal that said you get to take control of the thread.

As predicted..

As always.

Zerointegrity.