LMAO! You should have led with that. If that is all you got your party is in serious trouble.Blackvegetable » 10 Jul 2024, 4:59 pm » wrote: ↑ You obliged this move and now you forget the context.
You praise Grifty's acuity, but here he is failing to identify two of three of his wives and misidentifying his other rape victim as one of them.
I did.*Huey » 10 Jul 2024, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑ LMAO! You should have led with that. If that is all you got your party is in serious trouble.
Oh, a Jury did not find him liable for rape. The jurors specifically rejected that charge. Which is odd because the burden of proof is so much lower in a civil trial. It was the judge the reinterpreted the verdict, probably because "rape" was the expected outcome and like a good little goose stepper who obliged. Not to mention she is serial "rape" accuser.
The verdict was split: Jurors rejected Carroll’s claim that she was raped, finding Trump responsible for a lesser degree of sexual abuse. The judgment adds to Trump’s legal woes and offers vindication to Carroll, whose allegations had been mocked and dismissed by Trump for years.
https://apnews.com/article/trump-rape-c ... f9ec83d7db
You are gonna have to stop this game of generalities and ambiguities and make a point.
We all know that frightens you. You are not going to get the wiggle room you seek. This is all about your argument. And do far you don't have one.
I told you exactly where to go....then I told you exactly what to look at..*Huey » 10 Jul 2024, 5:20 pm » wrote: ↑ You did not make your overall point until a few minutes ago, Coward.
What else ya got?
Oh, you once again lined out Objective Facts concerning one oof your comments, Boston Coward. And are you gonna find out if any Salem Hotels offer complimentary passes to Planet Fitness. It will be a downgrade but I would need a place to work out and watch the five.
Here are the facts you are pulling a runner about:
Oh, a Jury did not find him liable for rape. The jurors specifically rejected that charge. Which is odd because the burden of proof is so much lower in a civil trial. It was the judge the reinterpreted the verdict, probably because "rape" was the expected outcome and like a good little goose stepper who obliged. Not to mention she is serial "rape" accuser.
The verdict was split: Jurors rejected Carroll’s claim that she was raped, finding Trump responsible for a lesser degree of sexual abuse. The judgment adds to Trump’s legal woes and offers vindication to Carroll, whose allegations had been mocked and dismissed by Trump for years.
https://apnews.com/article/trump-rape-c ... f9ec83d7db
Run Boston Coward, Run. I will continue to post them until you acknowledge the objective facts that you run from.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!Blackvegetable » 10 Jul 2024, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Ok, Coward..
Let's work through the list..
Did you see the photograph Grifty was discussing?
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!