Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 10 Jul 2024, 4:49 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 4:49 pm

Any bells yet?

NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif

 

Blackvegetable » 10 Jul 2024, 5:23 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 5:23 pm

I told you exactly where to go....then I told you exactly what to look at..

This is a "case"....

Continued use of strike thru to ignore objective fact is the sign of a coward, Boston Coward.

TO prove what?  What is it you are trying to prove?  

You also made a comment about trump being a rapist.  A jury did not find Trump liable for rape in a civil trial.  Acknowledge that is objective fact.  If you did not want that discussed, Boston Coward, you should not have brought it up.  

Here are the facts you are ignoring again:

Here are the facts you are pulling a runner about:

This is fact.  A Jury did not find him liable for rape.  The jurors specifically rejected that charge. Which is odd because the burden of proof is so much lower in a civil trial.  (This next part is part fact and opinion) It was the judge the reinterpreted the verdict, probably because "rape" was the expected outcome and like a good little goose stepper who obliged.   Not to mention she is serial "rape" accuser.

The verdict was split: Jurors rejected Carroll’s claim that she was raped, finding Trump responsible for a lesser degree of sexual abuse. The judgment adds to Trump’s legal woes and offers vindication to Carroll, whose allegations had been mocked and dismissed by Trump for years.

 

*Huey » 10 Jul 2024, 5:40 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 5:40 pm

Continued use of strike thru to ignore objective fact is the sign of a coward, Boston Coward.

TO prove what?  What is it you are trying to prove?  

You also made a comment about trump being a rapist.  A jury did not find Trump liable for rape in a civil trial.  Acknowledge that is objective fact.  If you did not want that discussed, Boston Coward, you should not have brought it up.  

Here are the facts you are ignoring again:

Here are the facts you are pulling a runner about:

This is fact.  A Jury did not find him liable for rape.  The jurors specifically rejected that charge. Which is odd because the burden of proof is so much lower in a civil trial.  (This next part is part fact and opinion) It was the judge the reinterpreted the verdict, probably because "rape" was the expected outcome and like a good little goose stepper who obliged.   Not to mention she is serial "rape" accuser.

The verdict was split: Jurors rejected Carroll’s claim that she was raped, finding Trump responsible for a lesser degree of sexual abuse. The judgment adds to Trump’s legal woes and offers vindication to Carroll, whose allegations had been mocked and dismissed by Trump for years.

 

Continued use of strike thru to ignore objective fact is the sign of a coward, Boston Coward.

I strike through the pre-meltdown drivel, Braintree Coward.

 A Jury did not find him liable for rape.  The jurors specifically rejected that charge. Which is odd because the burden of proof is so much lower in a civil trial.

 Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... udge-rape/

Never, ever, presume to "explain", Very Stupid Little Person.

that photo features two women who have submitted statements to the court, under penalty of perjury, that Grifty raped them.

Objective facts.

TO prove what?  What is it you are trying to prove?  

That Grifty is too far gone to recognize two of his three wives.

do you understand?

*Huey » 10 Jul 2024, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 2:19 pm

                 

Coward? I am right here ready to take you on.  What are YOU afraid of?  Why you running?  You wanted to hijack my Biden thread.  I **** you up on that and told you to start a thread.

Run Boston Coward, Run.

He’s from Boston?  That answers it. *** city in a *** state. 

SouthernFried » 10 Jul 2024, 6:32 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 6:32 pm

He’s from Boston?  That answers it. *** city in a *** state.

That's all cities. 

Blackvegetable » 10 Jul 2024, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 6:12 pm

do you understand?

NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif

dildo_swaggins » 10 Jul 2024, 7:22 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 7:22 pm

That's all cities. 

 

Evin Dallis?
 

Cannonpointer » 10 Jul 2024, 7:24 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 7:24 pm

Evin Dallis?

ain't but 2 things come out of dallis. Steers and queers. And down there even thats a gray area. 

dildo_swaggins » 10 Jul 2024, 7:27 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 7:27 pm

ain't but 2 things come out of dallis. Steers and queers. And down there even thats a gray area.

There is some mixin up twixt cattle and folks - though steers are off limits to your heteros, and bulls are off limits to everyone. 

Which leaves cows. Some pretty, some ugly, all available. 

Me, I do not **** cows anymore at all. It's too much work.

Gotta lay down on your back to suck their teats, run around front just to kiss 'em. Too much work. 
 

Blackvegetable » 10 Jul 2024, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 6:12 pm

that photo features two women who have submitted statements to the court, under penalty of perjury, that Grifty raped them.

Joe Oltman swore under penalty of perjury  that he witnessed Dominion Voting Systems VP of Security, Erik Coomer tell ANTIFA during a conference call..."Don't worry about the election. There is no **** way that I am going to let Trump win...!!!"

Of course the sworn testimony  was inadmissible because there was no proof....just like with the professional rape victims who are using our rigged Banana Republic judicial system to cash in on an easy payday with zero chance of being prosecuted for lying about being raped by Trump.
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 10 Jul 2024, 8:46 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 8:46 pm

Joe Oltman swore under penalty of perjury  that he witnessed Dominion Voting Systems VP of Security, Erik Coomer tell ANTIFA during a conference call..."Don't worry about the election. There is no **** way that I am going to let Trump win...!!!"

Of course the sworn testimony  was inadmissible because there was no proof....just like with the professional rape victims who are using our rigged Banana Republic judicial system to cash in on an easy payday with zero chance of being prosecuted for lying about being raped by Trump.

You're a *******.

Newsmax, another MAGA cable channel that trafficked in election fraud lies after Trump’s loss, settled with Coomer in April 2021, issuing a public apology and retraction at the time.

 “There are several facts that our viewers should be aware of. Newsmax has found no evidence that Dr. Coomer interfered with Dominion voting machines or voting software in any way, nor that Dr. Coomer ever claimed to have done so,” Newsmax said in a statement that was broadcast on the air. “Nor has Newsmax found any evidence that Dr. Coomer ever participated in any conversation with members of ‘Antifa,’ nor that he was directly involved with any partisan political organization.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/one-ameri ... ric-coomer
 

Blackvegetable » 10 Jul 2024, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 6:12 pm

I strike through the pre-meltdown drivel, Braintree Coward.

 Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... udge-rape/

Never, ever, presume to "explain", Very Stupid Little Person.

that photo features two women who have submitted statements to the court, under penalty of perjury, that Grifty raped them.

Objective facts.

That Grifty is too far gone to recognize two of his three wives.

do you understand?

Dum Dum,  I posted the judge said it. You just quoted it.  You don't read posts, idiot. More reading of posts asshole and you will look like less of a ****.

Never, ever presume to explain something I ALREADY POSTED Boston Coward.    


Today's Post Cover:

SouthernFried » 10 Jul 2024, 6:32 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 6:32 pm

He’s from Boston?  That answers it. *** city in a *** state.

He's not.  Just north of it it, in Nh.

*Huey » 11 Jul 2024, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2024, 8:32 am

Dum Dum,  I posted the judge said it. You just quoted it.  You don't read posts, idiot. More reading of posts asshole and you will look like less of a ****.

Never, ever presume to explain something I ALREADY POSTED Boston Coward.    

Today's Post Cover:

 Dum Dum,  I posted the judge said it

Are you challenging the PRESIDING JUDGE, Cretin?

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2024, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2024, 8:35 am

Are you challenging the PRESIDING JUDGE, Cretin?

It is quite clear what I am saying.  GO back and read it.  Not reposting it because you are too lazy to read it, Meltdown Mary.  

*Huey » 11 Jul 2024, 8:38 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2024, 8:38 am

It is quite clear what I am saying.  GO back and read it.  Not reposting it because you are too lazy to read it, Meltdown Mary.

Answer the question,  Neverrun 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2024, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2024, 8:40 am

Answer the question,  Neverrun

Read the comment, Toady.  Remember, Strike Thru is what **** you in this discussion.  It is quite clear what I meant. 

*Huey » 11 Jul 2024, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2024, 8:42 am

Read the comment, Toady.  Remember, Strike Thru is what **** you in this discussion.  It is quite clear what I meant.

Every time.

Alwaysrun

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2024, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2024, 8:51 am

Every time.

Alwaysrun

Running from what?  I have made clear what I meant with the original comment that you did not read.  This is on you, Boston Coward.  

This is what I mean, liar.  The Jury REJECTED the rape charge.  Then the Judge ran in to say it was.  Got it?  Nod you ******* ****.

 

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2024, 5:44 am » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2024, 5:44 am

You're a *******.

Newsmax, another MAGA cable channel that trafficked in election fraud lies after Trump’s loss, settled with Coomer in April 2021, issuing a public apology and retraction at the time.

 “There are several facts that our viewers should be aware of. Newsmax has found no evidence that Dr. Coomer interfered with Dominion voting machines or voting software in any way, nor that Dr. Coomer ever claimed to have done so,” Newsmax said in a statement that was broadcast on the air. “Nor has Newsmax found any evidence that Dr. Coomer ever participated in any conversation with members of ‘Antifa,’ nor that he was directly involved with any partisan political organization.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/one-ameri ... ric-coomer

You are just making my point for me.
Of course Joe Oltman's  sworn testimony  of Eric Coomer's conference  call to ANTIFA was inadmissible because there was no physical proof....just heresay
There is no way to prove whether Oltman was telling the truth or not.
.NOW THAT IS MY POINT
Your Professional Rape Victim Jean Carroll has zero proof that Trump raped her, so her testimony and the testimony of her witnesses who witnessed NOTHING is just as worthless.