@Blackvegetable*Huey » 11 Jul 2024, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑ THat is lie. I refuse to answer questions where concerning comments you did not read, or used strike thru. I also refuse to answer questions that you have asked dozen of times.
Mary, if you recall, I clearly marked part of that OPINION.
1. It is OBJECTIVE FACT the JURY rejected the rape "charge".
2. It is OBJECTIVE FACT that the Judge stepped in to interpret the Jury's findings.
3. It is OPINION as to why the Judge did so, as I pointed out in the original comment YOU DID NOT READ.
What else you got, Boston Coward.
Democrats are CORRUPT... they accuse Donald Trump of being a "RISK" to our Democracy... even though he spent 4 years as President and ONLY tried to make America BETTER, and MORE of a Democracy... WHILE THE DEMOCRAT Party has:BuckNaked » 10 Jul 2024, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/10/politics ... index.html
is this a first?
Why don't you see the diversion of reality from actual evolving in plain sight as eternally separated evolving forward now.*Huey » 11 Jul 2024, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑ THat is lie. I refuse to answer questions where concerning comments you did not read, or used strike thru. I also refuse to answer questions that you have asked dozen of times.
Mary, if you recall, I clearly marked part of that OPINION.
1. It is OBJECTIVE FACT the JURY rejected the rape "charge".
2. It is OBJECTIVE FACT that the Judge stepped in to interpret the Jury's findings.
3. It is OPINION as to why the Judge did so, as I pointed out in the original comment YOU DID NOT READ.
What else you got, Boston Coward.
*Huey » 11 Jul 2024, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑ THat is lie. I refuse to answer questions where concerning comments you did not read, or used strike thru. I also refuse to answer questions that you have asked dozen of times.
Mary, if you recall, I clearly marked part of that OPINION.
1. It is OBJECTIVE FACT the JURY rejected the rape "charge".
2. It is OBJECTIVE FACT that the Judge stepped in to interpret the Jury's findings.
3. It is OPINION as to why the Judge did so, as I pointed out in the original comment YOU DID NOT READ.
What else you got, Boston Coward.
*Huey » 11 Jul 2024, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑ THat is lie. I refuse to answer questions where concerning comments you did not read, or used strike thru. I also refuse to answer questions that you have asked dozen of times.
Mary, if you recall, I clearly marked part of that OPINION.
1. It is OBJECTIVE FACT the JURY rejected the rape "charge".
2. It is OBJECTIVE FACT that the Judge stepped in to interpret the Jury's findings.
3. It is OPINION as to why the Judge did so, as I pointed out in the original comment YOU DID NOT READ.
What else you got, Boston Coward.
Be careful what you wished true reality created by what people will do to make everyone miserable enough to ignore why they exist in the first place. Staged humanity demoralizes every great great grandchild cradle to grave added each rotation since birth last 350 generation gaps. the functioning actual original sinSouthernFried » 11 Jul 2024, 6:40 pm » wrote: ↑ It’s astonishing how far we have fallen in such a SHORT period of time too. Hell, just 60-70 years ago, a huge portion of congressman/senators, etc…. were hardened military leaders and the likes who had seen and experienced real ****. Fast forward a few decades and we get the likes of AOC, Waters, etc… People who have done NOTHING but run their cocksuckers.