Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2024, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2024, 8:43 am

You're well conditioned.

We're now at 3% annualized.

That is one tenth of one percent higher than it was in June 2018.

I bet you don't believe it.

“you’re well conditioned”…..back-handed hateful as that comment might have been, it’s that I have my bias, just like you do.   

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2024, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2024, 8:43 am

You're well conditioned.

We're now at 3% annualized.

That is one tenth of one percent higher than it was in June 2018.

I bet you don't believe it.

Like many Americans our wallets don't believe it.

*Huey » 12 Jul 2024, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2024, 1:53 pm

Like many Americans our wallets don't believe it.

I have disputed objective fact.

We know..

jefftec » 12 Jul 2024, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2024, 1:51 pm

“you’re well conditioned”…..back-handed hateful as that comment might have been, it’s that I have my bias, just like you do.

I can't make you believe facts...

That's up to you.

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2024, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2024, 2:16 pm

We know..

You keep lying about that comments when you specifically told it was typo.  It should read “I have NOT disputed objective fact”

Carry on…

*Huey » 12 Jul 2024, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2024, 2:18 pm

You keep lying about that comments when you specifically told it was typo.  It should read “I have NOT disputed objective fact”

Carry on…

It can't be a lie...

I'm quoting you verbatim.

And you're providing numerous examples.
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2024, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2024, 2:19 pm

It can't be a lie...

I'm quoting you verbatim.

And you're providing numerous examples.

Then go ahead and provide the link for context.  You are lying.  You were told what I meant.  Problem is I didn't correct because I feel correcting after you have been quoted is punk move.  BUT, when the other person continues to lie about it I think I will correct it.

HAHAHA

MurKQa....      


 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2024, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2024, 2:19 pm

It can't be a lie...

I'm quoting you verbatim.

And you're providing numerous examples.

No you are not.  You need to go look at the post.  So you can stop lying now.

*Huey » 12 Jul 2024, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2024, 1:47 pm

I'm focused.  Focused enough to see you **** up that attempt to use strike thru.  You need to focus.  I am not repeating answers that you have struck thru.

7...

You RE-posted it 7 times
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2024, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2024, 2:36 pm

7...

You RE-posted it 7 times

Let'skeep the record straight.  I did not offer a challenge.  I did repost a question numerous times.  No need to create a new thread away from established facts.

*Huey » 12 Jul 2024, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2024, 2:38 pm

Let'skeep the record straight.  I did not offer a challenge.  I did repost a question numerous times.  No need to create a new thread away from established facts.

Are these not your words?

If you prove it is lower you will then show I don't know ****

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2024, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2024, 2:41 pm

Are these not your words?

But you didn't do that.  And that is not a challenge.  

Now, you do have a challenge that you have ran from meaning you have lied all these years:

1.  Using the link you always repost post which section the Colt Sport Semi Auto Sports Rifle is listed, Civilian or military.

2.  Post the years the Colt Sporter Semi Auto Sports Rifle was the standard issue assault rifle for the Army and Marine combat units.  

If the answer to #1 is military and the you put a year range for #2 I will tae a month off.

So you ran you have been lying all these years.  It is time for you to put up or shut up.

*Huey » 12 Jul 2024, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2024, 2:45 pm

But you didn't do that.  And that is not a challenge.  

Now, you do have a challenge that you have ran from meaning you have lied all these years:

1.  Using the link you always repost post which section the Colt Sport Semi Auto Sports Rifle is listed, Civilian or military.

2.  Post the years the Colt Sporter Semi Auto Sports Rifle was the standard issue assault rifle for the Army and Marine combat units.  

If the answer to #1 is military and the you put a year range for #2 I will tae a month off.

So you ran you have been lying all these years.  It is time for you to put up or shut up.

I certainly did, whether or not you understand it...

You need to remember that you don't know ****.

And that is not a challenge.  

It was.

You got smoked.

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2024, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2024, 2:50 pm

I certainly did, whether or not you understand it...

You need to remember that you don't know ****.

It was.

You got smoked.

Sorry, strike thru is a non starter.  I will say you did not do 1 or 2.  That is the only way you will prove that weapon was designed for the military to use in combat.

Keep the Meltdown going Mary.  No go ahead screech I am having a meltdown.  That is always funny when you try to turn it around.

By the way, how many threads did you stalk me in today, thread where you either were not participating or I was talking to you?

Blackvegetable » 11 Jul 2024, 7:42 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jul 2024, 7:42 pm

This is INDISPUTABLY vague.

It is much lower.

Remember, you don't know ****..

For the month, it was NEGATIVE.

The Consumer Price Index, a measurement of the average change in prices for a commonly purchased basket of goods and services, dropped 0.1% from May,

https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/11/economy/ ... index.html

In June, 2021 it was 0.9

On a monthly basis, headline and core prices rose 0.9% against 0.5% estimates.

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/13/consume ... imate.html

Say it

But we are talking about the annual basis.  Buh Bye.

*Huey » 12 Jul 2024, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2024, 12:22 pm

BV is playing with the numbers.

He'd have been back by now.

He might have done some furious googling, but it was apparently for naught. 

If he had even a sleazy rebuttal, I think he'd have made it by now. He definitely cannot **** with the math.

I feel pretty confident in declaring that this is now MY thread. I own it. 

The only way it can be his thread again is if he EITHER rescues his premise, OR acknowledges that he cannot.

He lacks the chops to do either, IMO. He manifestly lacks the chops to do the latter.
 

*Huey » 12 Jul 2024, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2024, 2:52 pm

Sorry, strike thru is a non starter.  I will say you did not do 1 or 2.  That is the only way you will prove that weapon was designed for the military to use in combat.

Keep the Meltdown going Mary.  No go ahead screech I am having a meltdown.  That is always funny when you try to turn it around.

By the way, how many threads did you stalk me in today, thread where you either were not participating or I was talking to you?

That is the only way you will prove that weapon was designed for the military to use in combat.

No it isn't. 

the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design


One family.

One design.

Game. Set. Match. 

 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2024, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2024, 3:28 pm

No it isn't. 

the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

One family.

One design.

Game. Set. Match.

What are you doing running your nasty hole in my thread, ***?

I resolved this thread by destroying the OP and making its innumerate author eat my ****. 

And everybody saw it, ******. Everybody can suss that a 1/10th of 1% drop in one month - a DIME on a hundred dollar bill - does not drop by ten percent even ONE month's worth of of 3.3% inflation, much less 5 months of 3.3% inflation. 
 

*Huey » 12 Jul 2024, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2024, 2:59 pm

But we are talking about the annual basis.  Buh Bye.

Quote yourself, verbatim.