Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Dismissed with prejudice!
Dismissed with prejudice!
By Warcok
12 Jul 2024 5:36 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
12 Jul 2024 5:36 pm
Alec Baldwin walks because the DA hid evidence.
We need more targeted DA assassination along with reporters, journalist, judges, city council members, School board members.
Gotta strike the fear of God in them to do their job right and not try to **** the public over and groom their children.
We need more targeted DA assassination along with reporters, journalist, judges, city council members, School board members.
Gotta strike the fear of God in them to do their job right and not try to **** the public over and groom their children.
12 Jul 2024 7:15 pm
Jack Smith did the same thing. Guess it's time for Cannon to follow the lead of Baldwin's judge and dismiss the case against Trump, with prejudice.
12 Jul 2024 7:24 pm
12 Jul 2024 7:29 pm
The girl that loaded the gun and handed it to him is responsible, but so is Baldwin.BooRadley » 12 Jul 2024, 7:24 pm » wrote: ↑ I support Baldwin on this.
He's an actor that was handed a loaded gun.
Glad it's over for him.
He pointed he gun at someone, and pulled the trigger.
First rule of handling a gun is never point a gun at something you don't want to shoot.
12 Jul 2024 7:33 pm
You're on a movie set and someone hands you a prop gun.golfboy » 12 Jul 2024, 7:29 pm » wrote: ↑ The girl that loaded the gun and handed it to him is responsible, but so is Baldwin.
He pointed he gun at someone, and pulled the trigger.
First rule of handling a gun is never point a gun at something you don't want to shoot.
Reasonable people will assume it's not loaded with a live round
Example...
If the director of a movie tells an actor to drive a car as part of a scene and the actor starts driving and there's no brakes would you charge the actor if he drove into someone?
Id say no.
I simply don't think this was a good case to prosecute.
12 Jul 2024 7:36 pm
Doesn't matter if it's not supposed to be loaded.BooRadley » 12 Jul 2024, 7:33 pm » wrote: ↑ You're on a movie set and someone hands you a prop gun.
Reasonable people will assume it's not loaded with a live round
Example...
If the director of a movie tells an actor to drive a car as part of a scene and the actor starts driving and there's no brakes would you charge the actor if he drove into someone?
Id say no.
I simply don't think this was a good case to prosecute.
Even when shooting a scene, actors aren't supposed to aim a gun at someone when they are pretending to shoot them.
Even a "blank" round can produce a fatal injury.
12 Jul 2024 9:03 pm
He wanted to kill. He did. What happened afterward is entirely expected.
Out of all the crimes committed by "celebrities", how many ever actually pay the price?
Quibbling about details and/or merits of the case is irrelevant.
Out of all the crimes committed by "celebrities", how many ever actually pay the price?
Quibbling about details and/or merits of the case is irrelevant.
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
12 Jul 2024 10:11 pm
I can't or I would.golfboy » 12 Jul 2024, 7:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Jack Smith did the same thing. Guess it's time for Cannon to follow the lead of Baldwin's judge and dismiss the case against Trump, with prejudice.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
12 Jul 2024 10:13 pm
And Baldwin knew this. He was on record explaining that blanks can kill. He used his star power to behave unprofessionally.golfboy » 12 Jul 2024, 7:29 pm » wrote: ↑ The girl that loaded the gun and handed it to him is responsible, but so is Baldwin.
He pointed he gun at someone, and pulled the trigger.
First rule of handling a gun is never point a gun at something you don't want to shoot.
But a dirty DA got caught with her dick in the baby sitter, and the case is tossed. As I understand it, she's been sentenced to stand in sewer water for the rest of her life and talk to retarded kids about perdition.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
12 Jul 2024 10:15 pm
But you are unaware of the gun safety rules that exist on movie sets. They are quite stringent, and for good cause. They're playing with guns.BooRadley » 12 Jul 2024, 7:33 pm » wrote: ↑ You're on a movie set and someone hands you a prop gun.
Reasonable people will assume it's not loaded with a live round
Example...
If the director of a movie tells an actor to drive a car as part of a scene and the actor starts driving and there's no brakes would you charge the actor if he drove into someone?
Id say no.
I simply don't think this was a good case to prosecute.
Baldwin was NOT unaware. He was maliciously negligent. But he's off on the charges, and it doesn't bother me. Locking him up doesn't bring anyone back - and he's gonna pay a bunch MORE money in law suits on top of what he has already paid.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
13 Jul 2024 12:14 am
Warcok » 12 Jul 2024, 5:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Alec Baldwin walks because the DA hid evidence.
We need more targeted DA assassination along with reporters, journalist, judges, city council members, School board members.
Gotta strike the fear of God in them to do their job right and not try to **** the public over and groom their children.
He wasn't even charged correctly.
What he did was negligent homicide.
I wonder now that he was cleared of all wrong doing, will he continue to just grab whatever gun he is handed as a prop, aim it point blank at another person's face and squeeze the trigger without checking the load...?
HE SHOULD STICK TO HIS "STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE" SINCE IT WAS PROVEN IN COURT THAT THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG WITH THE WAY BALDWIN HANDLES FIREARMS.
13 Jul 2024 3:11 am
And if someone hands you a gun, and you don't check to see if it's loaded, then you are one stupid son of a bitch!BooRadley » 12 Jul 2024, 7:24 pm » wrote: ↑ I support Baldwin on this.
He's an actor that was handed a loaded gun.
Glad it's over for him.
He's dead Jim!
13 Jul 2024 3:12 am
You're a **** idiot.BooRadley » 12 Jul 2024, 7:33 pm » wrote: ↑ You're on a movie set and someone hands you a prop gun.
Reasonable people will assume it's not loaded with a live round
Example...
If the director of a movie tells an actor to drive a car as part of a scene and the actor starts driving and there's no brakes would you charge the actor if he drove into someone?
Id say no.
I simply don't think this was a good case to prosecute.
He's dead Jim!
13 Jul 2024 4:26 am
It's not loadedmurdock » 13 Jul 2024, 3:11 am » wrote: ↑ And if someone hands you a gun, and you don't check to see if it's loaded, then you are one stupid son of a bitch!
https://i.postimg.cc/TPK4TqPq/Pork-with-ears.jpg
13 Jul 2024 4:46 am
You're filming a movie with adults.murdock » 13 Jul 2024, 3:11 am » wrote: ↑ And if someone hands you a gun, and you don't check to see if it's loaded, then you are one stupid son of a bitch!
It's assumed it's not real.
If you're filming a war movie and someone hands you a hand grenade don't you assume it's not real?
They handed him a gun with a live round?
How about filming a car scene and the car has no brakes?
Still his fault?
13 Jul 2024 4:54 am
Explain to us why on a movie set there's a live round in a gun that's going to be used in a shooting scene?
13 Jul 2024 5:10 am
Because someone loaded it and once it was handed off no one checked to see if it was loaded. Only a **** idiot would do that. Clearly you are an idiot.BooRadley » 13 Jul 2024, 4:54 am » wrote: ↑ Explain to us why on a movie set there's a live round in a gun that's going to be used in a shooting scene?
He's dead Jim!
13 Jul 2024 5:11 am
Still his fault.BooRadley » 13 Jul 2024, 4:46 am » wrote: ↑ You're filming a movie with adults.
It's assumed it's not real.
If you're filming a war movie and someone hands you a hand grenade don't you assume it's not real?
They handed him a gun with a live round?
How about filming a car scene and the car has no brakes?
Still his fault?
He's dead Jim!
13 Jul 2024 5:28 am
I don't see it that way
You're making a movie and they hand you a loaded gun?
It's a movie set
Real bullets should have never been in a gun given to the main actor or anyone ...
But that's what they did.
There's someone in jail for that negligence.
I gave an example if the director had you drive a car with no brakes
Would that be the actors fault too?
On top of this the movie is a western with gun violence?
And the hand you a loaded gun???
13 Jul 2024 5:45 am
Instead of name calling why don't you address common sense reaction that an actor would assume a prop is safe?murdock » 13 Jul 2024, 5:10 am » wrote: ↑ Because someone loaded it and once it was handed off no one checked to see if it was loaded. Only a **** idiot would do that. Clearly you are an idiot.
A car chase with no brakes on the car?
A real hand grenade in a war movie?
How about an explosion scene and there's real dynamite?
All the actors fault?
I disagree
Who is online
In total there are 4002 users online :: 18 registered, 23 bots, and 3961 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Zeets2, Buffalo, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, FJB, MR-7, jerra b, murdock, LowIQTrash, PhiloBeddo, 31st Arrival, Huey, Fuelman
Bots: NING, Firefox/7.0, SiteLockSpider, Mediatoolkitbot, Baiduspider, Not, TTD-Content, ADmantX, facebookexternalhit, Kinza, DuckDuckGo, Nutch, CriteoBot, proximic, linkfluence.com, YandexBot, Googlebot, Bolt, bingbot, curl/7, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, GPTBot