Just to keep the timeline straight, you stupid queer, you people STARTED by insisting the number was zero.maineman » 28 Jul 2024, 7:09 am » wrote: ↑ this is manufactured outrage. How many actual instances of transgender men in dresses molesting women in rest rooms have ever happened? three? seven?
So you want to protect women everywhere EXCEPT the places they are most vulnerable - the places where they are literally caught with their pants down.maineman » 28 Jul 2024, 7:45 am » wrote: ↑ so.... seven(?) women have been assaulted in restrooms by men with dresses on in the past decade, but we ignore the MILLIONS that we believe it probably happened to but were never reported... and we also don't seem to really care too awfully much about the hundreds of thousands of women who reported being assaulted by men dressed as men in a myriad of other locations besides ladies restrooms. OBVIOUSLY, transgenderism is THE problem and not our culture that worships male dominance and longs for the good old days when women were barefoot and pregnant, didn't talk unless spoken to, walked two steps behind their men and definitely didn't vote!
There are hundreds of millions of men like you describe. And none of them are allowed in the ladies' room - because men tend to be sexually predatory.maineman » 28 Jul 2024, 7:45 am » wrote: ↑ and we also don't seem to really care too awfully much about the hundreds of thousands of women who reported being assaulted by men dressed as men in a myriad of other locations besides ladies restrooms. OBVIOUSLY, transgenderism is THE problem
Y'know what I notice?maineman » 28 Jul 2024, 7:45 am » wrote: ↑ so.... seven(?) women have been assaulted in restrooms by men with dresses on in the past decade, but
Oh man why did she narrate this ad?Beekeeper » 28 Jul 2024, 5:36 am » wrote: ↑ And THIS ad is what they are supporting!! Right @maineman @Blackvegetable ??
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/181 ... 9637417112
Rhetorical questions are syllogism in correct form. I knew the specific answers before asking.Cannonpointer » 28 Jul 2024, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Just to keep the timeline straight, you stupid queer, you people STARTED by insisting the number was zero.
Now you've gone to "probably not very many."
You suck.
maineman » 28 Jul 2024, 7:09 am » wrote: ↑ this is manufactured outrage. How many actual instances of transgender men in dresses molesting women in rest rooms have ever happened? three? seven?
Pssst.
Oh no, he's major dick suck now! His mommy trained him well!Beekeeper » 29 Jul 2024, 5:19 am » wrote: ↑ So, Capt. Dick Suck, tell us HOW MANY is TOO many before you start to give a ****???
murdock » 31 Jul 2024, 4:54 am » wrote: ↑ Oh no, he's major dick suck now! His mommy trained him well!
Beekeeper » 31 Jul 2024, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑ How do you think he made Captain in the Navy?? Dick sucking Admiral's COCKS!!
Right @maineman ?? Seeing how that is EXACTLY how promotions happen!! Especially when you finish DEAD *** LAST in the Naval Academy!!
maineman » 13 Jul 2024, 8:00 am » wrote: ↑ And, after the past week, I think that the myth that the MSM is in the bag for Biden has been totally destroyed. They have ALWAYS jumped on Biden's every verbal gaffe, and NOBODY except MSNBC ever says boo about the incoherent babbling from Trump.
https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-ho ... 2666437803
The New York Times jumped on Biden the day after the debate and ran numerous editorials - which got all sorts of TV coverage - calling for Joe to step down.
Finally, two days ago, they got around to posting this op-ed, and it immediately disappeared beneath the fold, so to speak.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/202 ... unfit.html
You enjoy blaming everyone else's adopted mentality than your own groupthink mantra ignoring why you exist proportionately alive in an ever changing form daily.