Liberal Forum

Zeets2 » 13 Jul 2024, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2024, 9:13 am

So your claim is that there are 200,000 children whose parent(s) are not getting food stamps or are not using that money to properly feed their kids with it? 
Don't those public schools in OK also provide free breakfast and lunch to all needy kids, even in the summer months when they're out of school?

How is it that too much is never enough for you idiot socialists?
Have you ever met a welfare program you didn't love?

JuCo 5 percenter... “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?

*Huey » 13 Jul 2024, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2024, 9:23 am

And now for the rest of the story:

"I am satisfied that kids are going to be fed in the summertime through the regular course of DHS and programs for the needy that we have in the State of Oklahoma," he said, adding that because the USDA hasn't finalized the rules of the program, the State couldn't determine what conditions the Biden administration might include.

 "We pushed back as the Biden Administration has tried to push social policies down related to funding," he said.

And:

"Oklahoma already has multiple programs to serve food insecure children across Oklahoma, including SNAP benefits, Oklahoma State Department of Education Summer Food Program and the Regional Food Bank of Oklahoma’s Summer Feeding Program," he said.

https://www.newson6.com/story/6596012d4 ... 0take%20it.

You always leave out important aspects of the story.  

Nothing to see here folks.  Move along

JuCo 5 percenter... “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?

*Huey » 13 Jul 2024, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2024, 9:33 am

I don't know, you got a link?

Which he is doing.  

Ya know, you sure bitch about debt and when someone does not take money you get pissed because they did not help create more debt.

Now wonder you are a Biden voter.  You just aren't that smart.

JuCo 5 percenter... “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?

Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2024, 7:53 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2024, 7:53 am

A new food program would have kicked in this summer, had Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt not turned down $48 million from a $2.5 billion initiative that the Biden administration calls “a giant step forward” in ending childhood hunger in the country. Though Oklahoma is one of the most food-insecure states, with surveys finding that more than 200,000 children are hungry at some point during a year, Stitt suggested the administration was “trying to push certain agenda items on kids.”

 He joined 12 fellow Republican governors who ultimately refused the money, part of the bipartisan budget agreement Congress reached in 2022. Some said they were reluctant because the country is mired in debt and the government already spends heavily on child nutrition programs — more than $25 billion in fiscal 2023. Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves called the new program an attempt “to expand the welfare state.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2 ... -rejected/

They're hurting.....but the country must be saved.....so **** 'em....and their children.

Republican Populism.

Vegas » 13 Jul 2024, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2024, 1:37 pm

No thoughts, etc... copy/paste.

*rippy38 » 13 Jul 2024, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2024, 9:13 am

I didn't say whether I like it or not... I was only pointing out that you ran away from the truth, as usual.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2024, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2024, 2:06 pm

But you lie.

I answered, by your standard.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2024, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2024, 8:49 am

So I'll pass.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2024, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2024, 8:49 am

I'm torn.

I know you're a **** idiot, so I can guess where you're going....

But confirmation will only leave me sad at the human condition.

So I'll pass.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2024, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2024, 8:49 am

I'm torn.

I know you're a **** idiot, so I can guess where you're going....

But confirmation will only leave me sad at the human condition.

So I'll pass.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2024, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2024, 2:05 pm

Share your thoughts..

Vegas » 13 Jul 2024, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2024, 2:59 pm

Your OP, your job. 

How many **** times...over and over....

Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2024, 4:45 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2024, 4:45 pm

Coward.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2024, 7:53 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2024, 7:53 am

A new food program would have kicked in this summer, had Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt not turned down $48 million from a $2.5 billion initiative that the Biden administration calls “a giant step forward” in ending childhood hunger in the country. Though Oklahoma is one of the most food-insecure states, with surveys finding that more than 200,000 children are hungry at some point during a year, Stitt suggested the administration was “trying to push certain agenda items on kids.”

 He joined 12 fellow Republican governors who ultimately refused the money, part of the bipartisan budget agreement Congress reached in 2022. Some said they were reluctant because the country is mired in debt and the government already spends heavily on child nutrition programs — more than $25 billion in fiscal 2023. Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves called the new program an attempt “to expand the welfare state.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2 ... -rejected/

They're hurting.....but the country must be saved.....so **** 'em....and their children.

Republican Populism.