Liberal Forum

Zeets2 » 16 Jul 2024, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 7:48 am

Rest assured, dickhead, the VOTERS in this country know EXACTLY who was responsible for the incompetence the SS showed at the Trump rally, and YOU'RE only sorry that Crooks missed!

So, chew on this, liberal scum!

Do you know what else all the women in America know or will know in the coming months?

JD Vance opposes all abortion, even in the case of rape or incest.

Chew on that, MAGA moron!    

maineman » 16 Jul 2024, 7:54 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 7:54 am

Do you know what else all the women in America know or will know in the coming months?

JD Vance opposes all abortion, even in the case of rape or incest.

Chew on that, MAGA moron!  

Well then, a dope like you should be delighted that abortion laws are now under the purview of each state, thanks to President Trump and a Supreme Court that has finally learned that their job is to INTERPRET the Constitution and not to legislate entirely new laws!

But that's not to say that your lies should be tolerated simply because you hate all things related to the coming Trump presidency.
Here's the truth that shoves your lies and **** back up your *** where it belongs:

Trump VP finalist JD Vance under scrutiny for past abortion comments
By David Rutz Fox News  July 12, 2024

During an Ohio Senate debate in 2022, Ryan accused Vance of saying rape was "inconvenient.""J.D., you called rape ‘inconvenient.’ Right?" Ryan said. "Rape is not inconvenient. It's a significant tragedy, and he thinks we should have Ohio state law which says if you're raped or pregnant through incest, you should be forced to have the baby."Vance fired back that he never called rape "inconvenient," and claimed Ryan knew that was a false statement. He said at the debate he was pro-life with "reasonable exceptions." He also said that year he supported Sen. Lindsey Graham's, R-S.C., proposed 15-week abortion ban that included exceptions for rape, incest and the mother's life.

So tell me.  Have you EVER found a liberal Democrat talking point that a puppet like you refuses to lie about?

 
 

Zeets2 » 16 Jul 2024, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 8:14 am

Well then, a dope like you should be delighted that abortion laws are now under the purview of each state, thanks to President Trump and a Supreme Court that has finally learned that their job is to INTERPRET the Constitution and not to legislate entirely new laws!

But that's not to say that your lies should be tolerated simply because you hate all things related to the coming Trump presidency.
Here's the truth that shoves your lies and **** back up your *** where it belongs:

So tell me.  Have you EVER found a liberal Democrat talking point that a puppet like you refuses to lie about?

Vance didn’t directly say “rape is inconvenient.” But when he was asked in an interview whether laws should allow people to get abortions if they were victims of rape or incest, he said that society shouldn’t view a pregnancy or birth resulting from rape or incest as “inconvenient.”In the interview, which occurred before the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, Vance was also asked whether anti-abortion laws should include rape and incest exceptions. “Two wrongs don’t make a right,” he said in response. “At the end of day, we are talking about an unborn baby. What kind of society do we want to have? A society that looks at unborn babies as inconveniences to be discarded?”​When asked again about the exceptions, Vance said: “The question portrays a certain presumption that is wrong. It’s not whether a woman should be forced to bring a child to term, it’s whether a child should be allowed to live, even though the circumstances of that child’s birth are somehow inconvenient or a problem to the society.”

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/f ... with-trump
 

maineman » 15 Jul 2024, 7:37 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jul 2024, 7:37 pm

cool.

I'll let you know when they show uo!                  

No you won't you lying son of a bitch.

And @Zeets2  ... If he has now softened his stance on rape and incest exceptions, you and I both know that is simply political expediency.  Have you READ the litany of horrid horrid things he has said about Trump over the years?  This asshole doesn't have a moral compass, he has a moral windsock and he is such a **** hypocrite for agreeing to be Trump's running mate after saying this:  During the 2016 presidential election, Vance wrote that he goes “back and forth between thinking Trump is a cynical a–hole like Nixon who wouldn’t be that bad (and might even prove useful) or that he’s America’s Hitler.”

maineman » 16 Jul 2024, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 8:26 am

Vance didn’t directly say “rape is inconvenient.” But when he was asked in an interview whether laws should allow people to get abortions if they were victims of rape or incest, he said that society shouldn’t view a pregnancy or birth resulting from rape or incest as “inconvenient.”In the interview, which occurred before the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, Vance was also asked whether anti-abortion laws should include rape and incest exceptions. “Two wrongs don’t make a right,” he said in response. “At the end of day, we are talking about an unborn baby. What kind of society do we want to have? A society that looks at unborn babies as inconveniences to be discarded?”​When asked again about the exceptions, Vance said: “The question portrays a certain presumption that is wrong. It’s not whether a woman should be forced to bring a child to term, it’s whether a child should be allowed to live, even though the circumstances of that child’s birth are somehow inconvenient or a problem to the society.”

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/f ... with-trump

Gee, I read your response twice and still can't find where Vance says he opposes ALL ABORTION, EVEN IN THE CASE OF RAPE OR INCEST as you so stupidly try to claim!

Any more lies that the left tells you ignorant supporters to help them push on the most ignorant voters?
Inquiring minds need to know!    
 

Zeets2 » 16 Jul 2024, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 8:36 am

Gee, I read your response twice and still can't find where Vance says he opposes ALL ABORTION, EVEN IN THE CASE OF RAPE OR INCEST as you so stupidly try to claim!

Any more lies that the left tells you ignorant supporters to help them push on the most ignorant voters?
Inquiring minds need to know!  

Vance was also asked whether anti-abortion laws should include rape and incest exceptions. “Two wrongs don’t make a right,” he said in response.

When asked again about the exceptions, Vance said: “The question portrays a certain presumption that is wrong. It’s not whether a woman should be forced to bring a child to term, it’s whether a child should be allowed to live, even though the circumstances of that child’s birth are somehow inconvenient or a problem to the society.”
 

FJB » 16 Jul 2024, 5:14 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 5:14 am

**** the fbi and secret service, they are responsible. **** you also bitch boi coward

You don't know ****.

maineman » 16 Jul 2024, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 8:35 am

And @Zeets2  ... If he has now softened his stance on rape and incest exceptions, you and I both know that is simply political expediency.  Have you READ the litany of horrid horrid things he has said about Trump over the years?  This asshole doesn't have a moral compass, he has a moral windsock and he is such a **** hypocrite for agreeing to be Trump's running mate after saying this:  During the 2016 presidential election, Vance wrote that he goes “back and forth between thinking Trump is a cynical a–hole like Nixon who wouldn’t be that bad (and might even prove useful) or that he’s America’s Hitler.”

And so?  Vance has admitted he was once a "Never Trumper", but recognizes the fact that Trump proved him wrong and he's happy to be on the same page with him now..
Is that any worse than Kamala saying she believes Biden was a rapist?
Did SHE ever retract that statement about Biden the Vance admitted he was wrong about Trump?
 

Zeets2 » 16 Jul 2024, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 8:36 am

Gee, I read your response twice and still can't find where Vance says he opposes ALL ABORTION, EVEN IN THE CASE OF RAPE OR INCEST as you so stupidly try to claim!

Any more lies that the left tells you ignorant supporters to help them push on the most ignorant voters?
Inquiring minds need to know!  

When mainedunce shows evidence to back his claims, it always works in reverse and makes him look like a bidencrimefamily mini-me......  

Zeets2 » 16 Jul 2024, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 8:46 am

And so?  Vance has admitted he was once a "Never Trumper", but recognizes the fact that Trump proved him wrong and he's happy to be on the same page with him now..
Is that any worse than Kamala saying she believes Biden was a rapist?
Did SHE ever retract that statement about Biden the Vance admitted he was wrong about Trump?

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/08/harri ... -a-rapist/

maineman » 16 Jul 2024, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 8:56 am

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/08/harri ... -a-rapist/

So tell me, genius. 
What does it infer when Kamala says she believes Tara Reade who claimed Biden raped her?:

4. HARRIS SAYS SHE BELIEVES BIDEN'S ACCUSERS OVER SEXUAL HARASSMENT CLAIMS“I believe them, and I respect them being able to tell their story and having the courage to do it,” the California senator told reporters in April 2019. Biden at the time had been accused by a number of women of inappropriate touching and kissing, including by a Nevada politician who said he came up behind her at a 2014 campaign stop and kissed her on the back of her head.
 
 

Zeets2 » 16 Jul 2024, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 9:07 am

So tell me, genius. 
What does it infer when Kamala says she believes Tara Reade who claimed Biden raped her?:

4. HARRIS SAYS SHE BELIEVES BIDEN'S ACCUSERS OVER SEXUAL HARASSMENT CLAIMS“I believe them, and I respect them being able to tell their story and having the courage to do it,” the California senator told reporters in April 2019. Biden at the time had been accused by a number of women of inappropriate touching and kissing, including by a Nevada politician who said he came up behind her at a 2014 campaign stop and kissed her on the back of her head.

clearly, you did not read the entire link I gave you which discusses it.
I am not surprised.

maineman » 16 Jul 2024, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 8:56 am

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/08/harri ... -a-rapist/

She implied he was a racist and a segregationist because of his stance on bussing, Swabbie.

Did anyone notice how calm the audience was? Nobody ran.. few even ducked..

maineman » 16 Jul 2024, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 8:35 am

And @Zeets2  ... If he has now softened his stance on rape and incest exceptions, you and I both know that is simply political expediency.  Have you READ the litany of horrid horrid things he has said about Trump over the years?  This asshole doesn't have a moral compass, he has a moral windsock and he is such a **** hypocrite for agreeing to be Trump's running mate after saying this:  During the 2016 presidential election, Vance wrote that he goes “back and forth between thinking Trump is a cynical a–hole like Nixon who wouldn’t be that bad (and might even prove useful) or that he’s America’s Hitler.”

THat **** ain't gonna work Swabby.  It is politics.  But continue to be a good little Goosestepper and post what you are told to post.

maineman » 16 Jul 2024, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 9:15 am

clearly, you did not read the entire link I gave you which discusses it.
I am not surprised.

I read it and see a big difference between her half-hearted denial of what she said and what Vance said when he admitted that he was happy that Trump had proven him wrong!

Did Kamala ever make the claim that she no longer believed Tara Reade, and admit that Biden had proven her wrong?
See the difference?  Or is that kind of clarity only something that Republicans are capable of?
 

Zeets2 » 16 Jul 2024, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 9:23 am

I read it and see a big difference between her half-hearted denial of what she said and what Vance said when he admitted that he was happy that Trump had proven him wrong!

Did Kamala ever make the claim that she no longer believed Tara Reade, and admit that Biden had proven her wrong?
See the difference?  Or is that kind of clarity only something that Republicans are capable of?

The fact is she never called Joe a rapist, so that makes you a **** liar.  We KNOW republicans are capable of THAT!

maineman » 16 Jul 2024, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 9:33 am

The fact is she never called Joe a rapist, so that makes you a **** liar.  We KNOW republicans are capable of THAT!

Calm down Swabbie. More proof you ain't what you say are.

 

maineman » 16 Jul 2024, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 9:33 am

The fact is she never called Joe a rapist, so that makes you a **** liar.  We KNOW republicans are capable of THAT!

Do you REALLY need the list of Biden lies to compare?
Go ahead and make my day, liberal!

If Kamala (apparently, your one true love) doesn't think Biden was a rapist, then exactly what is she unequivocally stating when she says she believes all those women making such claims of rape, molestation, sexual abuse, and let's certainly not forget the pedophilia claimed by his daughter, huh?