*rippy38 » 16 Jul 2024, 3:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Veggie is twisting himself up like a pretzel again, hoping nobody notices.
Damn that boy is stoopid.
Post the rule.*Huey » 16 Jul 2024, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑ I am not obliging you to do anything. You don't have to. No one is making you do it. BUT, that means all you have is an empty assertion.
Yo do what you want. Doesn't mean anyone will believe.
Oh, you already have a challenge that will ge rid of me for a month. You challenge is a diversion. Got that beach pic yet?![]()
![]()
If I post your two versions, what will you say?*rippy38 » 16 Jul 2024, 3:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Veggie is twisting himself up like a pretzel again, hoping nobody notices.
Damn that boy is stoopid.
Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2024, 3:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Post the rule.
And, as has been clearly demonstrated, even when fully accommodated on your terms you STILL run from your words.
Get real.*Huey » 16 Jul 2024, 3:58 pm » wrote: ↑ I haven't run from any words.
Right now all you have is an empty assertion. That is a fact. Tell you what. Since you owe many days away from this place I will stay away for three days. The amount of day left on the challenge you are running from. When you post these words it will be with a link to make sure they are in full and a one short sentence explaining how I am thrown under the pass. No questions.
Nod.
Ok, all you are is a fast food worker for Taco Bell. You are not an Ivy League grad or a Wall Street guy. You live in a single wide by a lake.
That is an assertion. According to you I don't anthing to back that up. According I am not obliged to.
Carry on, PK.
And now it's a bolt between your eyes.*Huey » 16 Jul 2024, 3:58 pm » wrote: ↑ I haven't run from any words.
Right now all you have is an empty assertion. That is a fact. Tell you what. Since you owe many days away from this place I will stay away for three days. The amount of day left on the challenge you are running from. When you post these words it will be with a link to make sure they are in full and a one short sentence explaining how I am thrown under the pass. No questions.
Nod.
Ok, all you are is a fast food worker for Taco Bell. You are not an Ivy League grad or a Wall Street guy. You live in a single wide by a lake.
That is an assertion. According to you I don't anthing to back that up. According I am not obliged to.
Carry on, PK.
Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2024, 4:03 pm » wrote: ↑ And now it's a bolt between your eyes.
viewtopic.php?p=2583478#p2583478
Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2024, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑ You had to appeal to yet another rule that doesn't apply to you.
Post your own **** rules.
How many designs does Drippy reference?*Huey » 16 Jul 2024, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑ I responded. THat doesn't throw me under the bus.
Oh, and the bolt in the Sporter? That is a different design as well. Posted that for you many times.
Speaking bolts.
You were told no questions.
Wow, Runny...*Huey » 16 Jul 2024, 4:29 pm » wrote: ↑ You were told no questions.
if you feel that throws me under bus you may subtract 3 days from the 30 you owe me. You only owe me 27.
Lmao!
if you feel that throws me under bus you may subtract 3 days from the 30 you owe me. You only owe me 27.
You didn't answer the question and you come back with ****.*Huey » 16 Jul 2024, 4:34 pm » wrote: ↑ if you feel that throws me under bus you may subtract 3 days from the 30 you owe me. You only owe me 27.
*Huey » 16 Jul 2024, 4:34 pm » wrote: ↑ if you feel that throws me under bus you may subtract 3 days from the 30 you owe me. You only owe me 27.
:rofl:I haven't run from any words.
Right now all you have is an empty assertion. That is a fact. Tell you what. Since you owe many days away from this place I will stay away for three days
Two things.Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2024, 4:37 pm » wrote: ↑ You didn't answer the question and you come back with ****.
Why I need NEVER bother with your demands for evidence.
*Huey » 16 Jul 2024, 4:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Two things.
The source you have posted a hundred times says you are wrong.
And to take a page from your playbook. who's words are these:
'...the weapon was changed in basic design....."?
no...it says exactly what it says.The source you have posted a hundred times says you are wrong
Irrelevant...that's the ATF..'...the weapon was changed in basic design....."?