Liberal Forum

*Huey » 16 Jul 2024, 4:47 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 4:47 pm

I don't believe that he threw me under the bus.  Tell you what, when you take the 30 you owe me, and then answer the challenge I gave you the other day, I will add that three to it.

Deal?  Remember, you are in arrears that must be paid.  I am not doing this on credit.

For what are you "owed 30"?

Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2024, 4:52 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 4:52 pm

For what are you "owed 30"?

The stroky challenge.  And let's not forgot you infamous Beach Pic hoax.  I'll leave that one off the table.  And yes, still have the green shots for when you first heard I had strokes and when you first posted about it.

Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2024, 4:52 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 4:52 pm

no...it says exactly what it says.

Irrelevant...that's the ATF..

But since you went there..

To what "weapon" does it refer?

It says in the paragraph that you didn't did read there was a different design on the lower.  I am not posting it again.

Actually, it is relevant.   The BATF ( a name they returned to recently) determines whether or not a rifle is a machine-gun (general term for automatic rifles used by them) or it isn't.  If it is it is classified an NFA firearm.  Meaning it is difficult to get.  If it isn't then it can be sold to civilians. 

YOU KNOW that they compared the weapon to an M 16.  Which was classified as a machine gun.  They said the sporter was changed IN BASIC DESIGN AS NOT TO BE A MACHINE GUN indicating it was a different design and not designed for combat.

You have link.  You have it well over 10 times.  And as recently as the weekend.  

I will take ST to mean you are surrendering and this argument is officially over.  You lost.  

Game over.

*Huey » 16 Jul 2024, 5:01 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 5:01 pm

It says in the paragraph that you didn't did read there was a different design on the lower.  I am not posting it again.

Actually, it is relevant.  The BATF ( a name they returned to recently) determines whether or not a rifle is a machine-gun (general term for automatic rifles used by them) or it isn't.  If it is it is classified an NFA firearm.  Meaning it is difficult to get.  If it isn't then it can be sold to civilians. 

YOU KNOW that they compared the weapon to an M 16.  Which was classified as a machine gun.  They said the sporter was changed IN BASIC DESIGN AS NOT TO BE A MACHINE GUN indicating it was a different design and not designed for combat.

You have link.  You have it well over 10 times.  And as recently as the weekend.  

I will take ST to mean you are surrendering and this argument is officially over.  You lost.  

Game over.

You didn't answer the question 
Is it listed as a variant?

Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2024, 5:06 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 5:06 pm

You didn't answer the question 
Is it listed as a variant?

Bad open.  Game over.

I might be back tonight.  

*Huey » 16 Jul 2024, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 4:55 pm

The stroky challenge.  And let's not forgot you infamous Beach Pic hoax.  I'll leave that one off the table.  And yes, still have the green shots for when you first heard I had strokes and when you first posted about it.

Nah...

What about the 2 weeks you owe for the thread you tried to bump
 

*Huey » 16 Jul 2024, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 5:10 pm

Bad open.  Game over.

I might be back tonight.

run.
 
 

*Huey » 16 Jul 2024, 5:01 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 5:01 pm

It says in the paragraph that you didn't did read there was a different design on the lower.  I am not posting it again.

Actually, it is relevant.   The BATF ( a name they returned to recently) determines whether or not a rifle is a machine-gun (general term for automatic rifles used by them) or it isn't.  If it is it is classified an NFA firearm.  Meaning it is difficult to get.  If it isn't then it can be sold to civilians. 

YOU KNOW that they compared the weapon to an M 16.  Which was classified as a machine gun.  They said the sporter was changed IN BASIC DESIGN AS NOT TO BE A MACHINE GUN indicating it was a different design and not designed for combat.

You have link.  You have it well over 10 times.  And as recently as the weekend.  

I will take ST to mean you are surrendering and this argument is officially over.  You lost.  

Game over.

They said the sporter was changed IN BASIC DESIGN AS NOT TO BE A MACHINE GUN indicating it was a different design and not designed for combat.

No...that is NOT what it means...obviously..were it a "different design" there would be no reference to another weapon. 

Duh

*Huey » 16 Jul 2024, 3:53 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 3:53 pm

I spell STOOPID that way sometimes for him as well.  Easier for him to spell it out.

Do you know what he is talking about? I'd go look myself but Have not clue what comment is talking about.

He's stuck on some lost argument from months or years gone by... like always.

LOL
 

*rippy38 » 16 Jul 2024, 5:58 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 5:58 pm

He's stuck on some lost argument from months or years gone by... like always.

LOL

How's that STOOPID going down now, Gigli?

Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2024, 5:12 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 5:12 pm

Nah...

What about the 2 weeks you owe for the thread you tried to bump

I don't owe a thing, but if I do subtract it from the month you owe me.

Blackvegetable » 14 Jul 2024, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑

14 Jul 2024, 8:59 am

Trump said: “I don’t **** care that they have weapons, they’re not here to hurt me. They’re not here to hurt me. Take the **** mags away. Let my people in. They can march to the Capitol from here, let the people in and take the mags away.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... tol-attack

As you wish....

But why use a "sporting rifle"?

The AR-15 is one of the most versatile and effective self / defense and sport rifles ever made.
Too bad this young Libtard Assassin used this great self defense weapon [that originally belonged to  his Father,] but we have laws that do not allow us to discriminate against people who have clean criminal records and clean mental health records..
Any laws beyond that would be what lLIBERAL FASCIST DRAFT DODGING  ******  BITCHCHES like you WHO NEVER SERVED want to see implemented against the law abiding public
Hate to destroy your failed GOTCHA but there it is.

 
 

Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2024, 5:13 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 5:13 pm

run.

Sorry dude. my wife did not leave the country and run all the way to Columbia with my balls to get away from me.  I gotta life.

 

Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2024, 5:30 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 5:30 pm

No...that is NOT what it means...obviously..were it a "different design" there would be no reference to another weapon. 

Duh

That is what it means and that is what is says.  You lose.    

*rippy38 » 16 Jul 2024, 5:58 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 5:58 pm

He's stuck on some lost argument from months or years gone by... like always.

LOL

Of course.  Now he is telling me that the BATF was classifying the sporter they did to mean the design was changed when they said  "....the weapon was changed in basic design...."

He is a **** ****.

@Blackvegetable  

*Huey » 16 Jul 2024, 6:37 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 6:37 pm

That is what it means and that is what is says.  You lose.  

**** idiot......

If a unique design, there would be no mention of "redesign".


 

*Huey » 16 Jul 2024, 6:40 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 6:40 pm

Of course.  Now he is telling me that the BATF was classifying the sporter they did to mean the design was changed when they said  "....the weapon was changed in basic design...."

He is a **** ****.

@Blackvegetable

What weapon was changed?

*Huey » 16 Jul 2024, 6:35 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 6:35 pm

Sorry dude. my wife did not leave the country and run all the way to Columbia with my balls to get away from me.  I gotta life.

Neither did mine...


BRAZILIAN, you **** idiot.

*Huey » 16 Jul 2024, 6:34 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 6:34 pm

I don't owe a thing, but if I do subtract it from the month you owe me.

What do you mean "if"?

It was another occasion of you staring the evidence in the face - and denying it...

 

Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2024, 6:43 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2024, 6:43 pm

Neither did mine...

BRAZILIAN, you **** idiot.

Mail order bride didn't work out well, did it?