Ok, maybe I was too hasty, I hadn't seen the Cheeto bitch in action before.. I will believe she is that incompent.. lol.. the buck stops with me, I will make sure it won't happen again..Jantje_Smit » 15 Jul 2024, 7:26 am » wrote: ↑ That what they are counting on, people believing they are simply incompentent, no one is that incompetent.. lol.. well, not the SS anyway..
![]()
That is your projection.Buffalo » 16 Jul 2024, 2:02 am » wrote: ↑ On that I will agree. So, you agree with the US facilitating the murder of Ghaddafi but excuse Iran? OK
I have, and based on your comprehension of the materials at had, I'd have sworn a blood oath that you had not.Buffalo » 16 Jul 2024, 2:02 am » wrote: ↑ Ever read John Perkins' "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man"?
Walmart Security **** saw him. **** CIVILIANS WHOSE JOB IT WASN'T saw him. Get your lazy head out of your ***, you cognitively torpid swine.ROG62 » 16 Jul 2024, 6:37 am » wrote: ↑ You're assuming they were watching him the whole time...if they were watching and were aware of the weapon, that's a problem...
Everything that I am talking about is on film. You're just a lazy piece of **** who wants someone else - another man - to tell him what he is seeing. You don't want to do the heavy lifting of THINKING FOR YOURSELF.ROG62 » 16 Jul 2024, 6:37 am » wrote: ↑ I haven't paid much attention to it as the rumor mill is in a perpetual state of hyper flux...I'll wait for the newsreel at 10, whatever day it comes out...
Trust and believe, son - I do.ROG62 » 16 Jul 2024, 6:37 am » wrote: ↑ believe me when I say I'm a patient man LAZY PICE OF ****, Shawshank...I'm still waiting for the JFK papers...
God answers the prayers of the righteous.
I don't really care about his motive but it is strange that the MSM doesn't seem to care either, they couldn't wait to point out that he was a registered republican, wouldn't he need a motive other than TDS if he wasn't a deranged liberal.. and now no one can ask him, they made sure of that.. it smells..Cannonpointer » 15 Jul 2024, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Who cares about motive? The important thing is that he was a crazed loner - utterly friendless with no one helping him. The next important thing is that the heroes in the secret service saved the president from him.
I mean, I guess you would have to ask HIM why he did it - crazed loner that he is. But unfortunately, he was killed immediately after he took his shots.
Yeah, your advise is worht exactly what I pay you for it...NOTHING!!!Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2024, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑ That is your projection.
Between us, only you agree with the murder of Ghadaffi - but you do it sneaky-like and partisan.
YOU affirm the deep state's right to assassinate in contravention of law. You do.
I don't. I say BOTH were wrong. But you - based on partisanship - commend the one and condemn the other. But in commending the one, you lay the groundwork for a defense of the other, son. And whether you or some other jewish lawyer build on that defense is not relevant. You laid it.
So you can just take your foul, partisan mouth right up off of me, because my position is principled - yours is partisan.
I have, and based on your comprehension of the materials at had, I'd have sworn a blood oath that you had not.
What the deep state did to Iran and continues to do to Iran is the step that FOLLOWS what Perkins describes - as was what was done in Libya. It's what the deep state does when their economic hitmen fail to corrupt a system.
You need to hitch your big boy britches all the way up and apply the same standard to the Orange Dream that you do to hitlery klingon, son.
Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2024, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ God answers the prayers of the righteous.
If you check the dictionary, retribution and terrorism are separated by many words and many shades of meaning.
I kinda doubt this is tied to any real deliberate conspiracy but just a symptom of the general loss of competency in the usa. We cant land on the moon anymore. Hollywood cant make decent movies. There is no decent music. Apps are buggy. There has been no significant new technology. Etc. Everyone is just kinda stupid and bad at their job compared to 40 or certainly 80 years ago.Cannonpointer » 14 Jul 2024, 5:22 pm » wrote: ↑ *** posts will be PG'd.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6-z0PqTKeU
You partisanship and double standard are worth exactly what they pay for it - nonstop brainwashing.Buffalo » 16 Jul 2024, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, your advise is worht exactly what I pay you for it...NOTHING!!!
There is no more question that the secret service is less competent than in the past, than there is that they were manifestly in on this assassination attempt. Sitting with a bead on the shooter for 42 second until AFTER he took his shots is not incompetence. Being fat and lazy and uncoordinated and hired because you have a ****** - THAT is incompetence. Waiting for the shooter's shots to take yours is being an accessory, not ineffectual or incompetent.FOS » 16 Jul 2024, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑ I kinda doubt this is tied to any real deliberate conspiracy but just a symptom of the general loss of competency in the usa. We cant land on the moon anymore. Hollywood cant make decent movies. There is no decent music. Apps are buggy. There has been no significant new technology. Etc. Everyone is just kinda stupid and bad at their job compared to 40 or certainly 80 years ago.
So it is just predictable that there would be general incompetence across the board. And that includes the secret service.
WTF Shawshank, you still drunk? You're being a bit obtuse...Cannonpointer » Today, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑ Walmart Security **** saw him. **** CIVILIANS WHOSE JOB IT WASN'T saw him. Get your lazy head out of your ***, you cognitively torpid swine.
Everything that I am talking about is on film. You're just a lazy piece of **** who wants someone else - another man - to tell him what he is seeing. You don't want to do the heavy lifting of THINKING FOR YOURSELF.
Trust and believe, son - I do.
Go sit with hooey, ***. You can hug and console each other.
If they keep defending themselves, we're gonna have to call them tourists!GHETTOBLASTER » 16 Jul 2024, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑ I don't need to check the dictionary
If your remotely detonated copper formed penetrators have successfully made the people you hate afraid of you, then you have succeeded.
The "Don't Tread On Me" flag suits them pretty well.Cannonpointer » 16 Jul 2024, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑ If they keep defending themselves, we're gonna have to call them tourists!
I never even bothered to mention drones because I didn't believe I could stomach another of hooey's cowardly excuses.GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Jul 2024, 12:35 am » wrote: ↑ Thanks for posting the photo....that was my first look at the scene and it looks even simpler to defend than what I imagined.
We have "eye in the sky" capability that works along with the agents on the ground...let's not forget that.