Grow your own lettuce you Illegal alien loving piece of **** traitor.Blackvegetable » 39 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ After a weekend assassination attempt that has galvanized support for the former president, yields on longer-term Treasury securities rose a bit more than shorter-term ones on Monday, a subtle sign that the Trump inflation threat is on the market’s radar. It’s a trend, known as the “Trump trade,”
Trumponomics 2.0 Will Awaken Bond Vigilantes
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/artic ... vigilantes
Taken at face value, there are a lot of inflationary proposals in Donald Trump’s economic agenda. If elected, he could extend his 2017 tax cuts amid yawning budget deficits and dramatically curb labor supply by sending the National Guard to deport millions of undocumented immigrants. He could push a 10% across-the-board import tariff and 60% duties on Chinese goods specifically, and has allies that might reportedly try to undermine Federal Reserve independence. Fortunately, markets can nudge Trump toward moderation.
After years of railing about Inflashun, MAGAts are now going to vote in favor of an entirely self inflicted version.
Why?
Because they're **** idiots.
GHETTOBLASTER » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Grow your own lettuce you Illegal alien loving piece of **** traitor.
That bed wetting Draft Dodger dies 1000 deaths every day...so deleting our truthful posts would naturally be his coping mechanism....*Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I wouldn't bother with him on this thread. Even if you post on the topic he used peanut gallery. If he disagrees with you or you post facts that hurt is argument he will remove it.
These two posts will probably be gone.
What are you getting at, Connie?ConsRule » 16 Jul 2024, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑ Sadly, far too few voters (and people posting here) understand a President...regardless of their political party...can only do what Congress lets them do unless it can be done by an EO. And then, far too few remember what any President can do with an EO, the next President can undo with an EO. Campaign promises and party platform don't mean **** unless one party controls both chambers in Congress and the Oval Office.
TLT is in a bullish formation. Yields are coming down.Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2024, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑ After a weekend assassination attempt that has galvanized support for the former president, yields on longer-term Treasury securities rose a bit more than shorter-term ones on Monday, a subtle sign that the Trump inflation threat is on the market’s radar. It’s a trend, known as the “Trump trade,”
Trumponomics 2.0 Will Awaken Bond Vigilantes
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/artic ... vigilantes
Taken at face value, there are a lot of inflationary proposals in Donald Trump’s economic agenda. If elected, he could extend his 2017 tax cuts amid yawning budget deficits and dramatically curb labor supply by sending the National Guard to deport millions of undocumented immigrants. He could push a 10% across-the-board import tariff and 60% duties on Chinese goods specifically, and has allies that might reportedly try to undermine Federal Reserve independence. Fortunately, markets can nudge Trump toward moderation.
After years of railing about Inflashun, MAGAts are now going to vote in favor of an entirely self inflicted version.
Why?
Because they're **** idiots.
Figure it out. Anyone with even a modicum of intelligence should be able to do that easily.
My guess is that it is some excuse for consistently voting for fiscal profligates...ConsRule » 16 Jul 2024, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑ Figure it out. Anyone with even a modicum of intelligence should be able to do that easily.
Yep, the contards are idiots. However, the deficit explosion will continue regardless...it's been a secular trend since 2000 when the dot com boom artificially inflated tax revenuesBlackvegetable » 16 Jul 2024, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑ As the entirely predictable explosion of deficits proceeds, prepare for a lot of chindribble along the lines of
"It’s not about Revenues...It's about Spending!"
Damn, these people are stupid.
Close to what?Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2024, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑ My guess is that it is some excuse for consistently voting for fiscal profligates...
"They can run on tax cuts...but CONGESS is to blame for the consequences...(...sob...)"
am I close?
Blackvegetable » Today, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑ After a weekend assassination attempt that has galvanized support for the former president, yields on longer-term Treasury securities rose a bit more than shorter-term ones on Monday, a subtle sign that the Trump inflation threat is on the market’s radar. It’s a trend, known as the “Trump trade,”
Trumponomics 2.0 Will Awaken Bond Vigilantes
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/artic ... vigilantes
Taken at face value, there are a lot of inflationary proposals in Donald Trump’s economic agenda. If elected, he could extend his 2017 tax cuts amid yawning budget deficits and dramatically curb labor supply by sending the National Guard to deport millions of undocumented immigrants. He could push a 10% across-the-board import tariff and 60% duties on Chinese goods specifically, and has allies that might reportedly try to undermine Federal Reserve independence. Fortunately, markets can nudge Trump toward moderation.
After years of railing about Inflashun, MAGAts are now going to vote in favor of an entirely self inflicted version.
Why?
Because they're **** idiots.
Indisputably one of the dumbest **** alive..
go apologize to the placenta wasted on you.Figure it out. Anyone with even a modicum of intelligence should be able to do that easily.
Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2024, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Indisputably one of the dumbest **** alive..
go apologize to the placenta wasted on you.
Admission...NOW! Then you get your example.
You ARE this mindless, Connie...ConsRule » 16 Jul 2024, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑ You didn't answer the question?
Not that that comes as a surprise to anyone here, but...
ConsRule » 16 Jul 2024, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑ Sadly, far too few voters (and people posting here) understand a President...regardless of their political party...can only do what Congress lets them do unless it can be done by an EO. And then, far too few remember what any President can do with an EO, the next President can undo with an EO. Campaign promises and party platform don't mean **** unless one party controls both chambers in Congress and the Oval Office.
Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2024, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑What are you getting at, Connie?ConsRule » 16 Jul 2024, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑ Sadly, far too few voters (and people posting here) understand a President...regardless of their political party...can only do what Congress lets them do unless it can be done by an EO. And then, far too few remember what any President can do with an EO, the next President can undo with an EO. Campaign promises and party platform don't mean **** unless one party controls both chambers in Congress and the Oval Office.
ConsRule » 16 Jul 2024, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑Figure it out. Anyone with even a modicum of intelligence should be able to do that easily.
It's the complete absence of shame that impresses the most.ConsRule » 16 Jul 2024, 12:59 pm » wrote: ↑
So, you refuse to provide clarification...got it. Don't whine about people not answering your questions if you refuse to give clarification.
Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2024, 1:32 pm » wrote: ↑
It's the complete absence of shame that impresses the most.