It doesn't require format.*Huey » 17 Jul 2024, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Sorry, wrong format.
Any post where you use strike thru will not be considered for discussion.
Obviously, **** idiot.
Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2024, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Obviously, **** idiot.
Otherwise you wouldn't have anything to respond to.
It's cited in VF from another source, and FFS don't be so **** stupid.*Huey » 17 Jul 2024, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Sorry, many of us posted from the report, not Vanity Fair. And you are not allowed to use them because they are linked off of Drudge.
I have the words of the presiding judge...who the **** do you think the authority on the matter is?*Huey » 17 Jul 2024, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Hello? BV? You got that article yet showing a jury finding Trump guilty of or Liable for Rape?
Take the L. What I said was 100% correct. It was a judge that made that interpretation of the verdict.
*Huey » 17 Jul 2024, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Sorry, many of us posted from the report, not Vanity Fair. And you are not allowed to use them because they are linked off of Drudge.
And you are not allowed to use them because they are linked off of Drudge.
And all of it true. But that is incorrect statement. I been have posting mostly the cover because that is what they are k own for. Most of the articles I have posted since the debate come from you primary source, CNN.Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2024, 12:48 pm » wrote: ↑ It's cited in VF from another source, and FFS don't be so **** stupid.
You've been littering the forum with nypost crap
Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2024, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑ I have the words of the presiding judge...who the **** do you think the authority on the matter is?
*Huey » 17 Jul 2024, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑ And all of it true. But that is incorrect statement. I have posting mostly the cover because that is what they are k own for. Most of the articles I have posted since the debate come from you primary source, CNN.
Nice try.
And all of it true. But that is incorrect statement. I have posting mostly the cover
What did the judge say the jury found?
No, ****...*Huey » 17 Jul 2024, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑ It is your rule.You go bananas when someone claims Drudge as a source.
Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2024, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑ No, ****...
There's informed opinion and analysis, and there's regurgitation of the **** du Jour on The Five.
You can't tell one from the other.
JustinSane » 17 Jul 2024, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Whether my views are representative of those who read The Epoch Times or not, I would say is the least of the Democrat supporters problems at the moment. You are all in such a quagmire of your own making, that the idea of you winning the next election is now all but forgettable. That could well change, agreed, but maybe some internal monologue questioning how you pig-**** ended up here might be worthwhile.. Politicized lawfare against your opponent has to come in to the mix
The rapist felon?Politicized lawfare against your opponent has to come in to the mix
According to Megan McCardle, one of the reasons I pay them reluctantly.*Huey » 17 Jul 2024, 1:08 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
According to WAPO FOX NEWS viewers were more informed on Biden than their audience. Because they did not do their job.
Here is a pre-emptive strikeBlackvegetable » 17 Jul 2024, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑ No, ****...
There's informed opinion and analysis, and there's regurgitation of the **** du Jour on The Five.
You can't tell one from the other.
No...*Huey » 17 Jul 2024, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑ You already told me. The jury did not say it. My comment was 100% correct.
Suck it.