Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2024, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2024, 1:09 pm

The rapist felon?

why would you nominate him?

Trump was not convicted of rape. Who are you talking about?

Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2024, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2024, 1:10 pm

According to Megan McCardle, one of the reasons I pay them reluctantly.

You wouldn't understand.

The left side of the Media has been an abysmal failure up to the debate.  The media YOU got your information from.  WAPO RAN the **** piece.  They didn't have to if they didn't agree with it.
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2024, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2024, 1:11 pm

No...

You're struggling with this.

What did the judge say the jury found?

You already posted.  No need for me to do it.  My point is 100% correct.  

*Huey » 17 Jul 2024, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2024, 1:13 pm

You already posted.  No need for me to do it.  My point is 100% correct.

No...it is nonsense....

If not, you'd post the words of the presiding judge.

But clearly juxtaposing the two comments would not work in your favor.

Take the L.

*Huey » 17 Jul 2024, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2024, 1:12 pm

The Fly side of the Media has been an abysmal failure up to the debate.  The media YOU got your information from.  WAPO RAN the **** piece.  They didn't have to if they didn't agree with it.

Stop explaining stuff....You don't even know who she is.

Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2024, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2024, 1:17 pm

No...it is nonsense....

If not, you'd post the words of the presiding judge.

But clearly juxtaposing the two comments would not work in your favor.

Take the L.

You already posted them.  I need words from a jury.

Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2024, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2024, 1:18 pm

Stop explaining stuff....You don't even know who she is.

I don't care who she is.  This is not about her.  It what her editors, the editorial board, at WAPO decided to print..  Stop reframing and diverting.

Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2024, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2024, 9:25 am

Do you consider yourself smarter than @Vegas  ?

Another **** question to hide behind. Tagging me again. Stalker. 

*Huey » 17 Jul 2024, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2024, 1:19 pm

You already posted them.  I need words from a jury.

Irrelevant.

You won't for the reason stated. Hence the narrative version.

The jury is not the law in the courtroom. The judge is.


 

*Huey » 17 Jul 2024, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2024, 1:20 pm

I don't care who she is.  This is not about her.  It what her editors, the editorial board, at WAPO decided to print..  Stop reframing and diverting.

It is....You are making her opinion the issue....

If you knew who she is, you'd have the context.

Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2024, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2024, 1:20 pm

Irrelevant.

You won't for the reason stated. Hence the narrative version.

The jury is not the law in the courtroom. The judge is.

Nobody said otherwise.  As you just admitted it is the Judge who interpreted the finding.  It is not what the Jury said:

The verdict was split: Jurors rejected Carroll’s claim that she was raped, finding Trump responsible for a lesser degree of sexual abuse. The judgment adds to Trump’s legal woes and offers vindication to Carroll, whose allegations had been mocked and dismissed by Trump for years.

Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2024, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2024, 7:56 am

It’s difficult for Americans who grew up on sunny images of Ronald Reagan to grasp the depth of the contemporary Republican Party’s antipathy toward democracy. The most convincing evidence, of course, is the elevation of Donald Trump. Parties committed to republican government do not nominate criminals, demagogues or coup-plotters — Trump is emphatically all three — to leadership.

Republicans Can’t Stop Lying About Voter Fraud

 https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/artic ... oter-fraud

self-evident.

There is no such thing as Republican Populism - it's a fraud.

No thoughts, etc...copy/paste. 

TDS

Bloomberg:     

Veghead continues to prove my media comment. 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2024, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2024, 1:21 pm

It is....You are making her opinion the issue....

If you knew who she is, you'd have the context.

WAPO printed it.  Nod.

PS.  This how a man does it without a million questions.  

JustinSane » 17 Jul 2024, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2024, 1:11 pm

Trump was not convicted of rape. Who are you talking about?

Trump rapes @Blackvegetable  's mind 24x7

*Huey » 17 Jul 2024, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2024, 1:23 pm

WAPO printed it.  Nod.

PS.  This how a man does it without a million questions.

Does what?

Assert stupid ****?

A man doesn't run from EVERYTHING.


 

*Huey » 17 Jul 2024, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2024, 1:22 pm

Nobody said otherwise.  As you just admitted it is the Judge who interpreted the finding.  It is not what the Jury said:

The verdict was split: Jurors rejected Carroll’s claim that she was raped, finding Trump responsible for a lesser degree of sexual abuse. The judgment adds to Trump’s legal woes and offers vindication to Carroll, whose allegations had been mocked and dismissed by Trump for years.

The jury returned a verdict.

Team Grifty tried to spin it.

The PRESIDING JUDGE clarified.
 

*Huey » 17 Jul 2024, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2024, 1:13 pm

You already posted.  No need for me to do it.  My point is 100% correct.

I am warning you...
Methboy has been on this board non-stop since 5:02 a.m. today..

 
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2024, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2024, 1:25 pm

Does what?

Assert stupid ****?

A man doesn't run from EVERYTHING.

You can not deny that WAPO ran the opinion piece.  They made a conscious decision to print.  That is not asserting stupid ****.  That is posting FACT.  

I am not running.  I am posting fact after fact after fact.

Like this fact:

The verdict was split: Jurors rejected Carroll’s claim that she was raped, finding Trump responsible for a lesser degree of sexual abuse. The judgment adds to Trump’s legal woes and offers vindication to Carroll, whose allegations had been mocked and dismissed by Trump for years.

Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2024, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2024, 1:26 pm

The jury returned a verdict.

Team Grifty tried to spin it.

The PRESIDING JUDGE clarified.

This is the verdict:

The verdict was split: Jurors rejected Carroll’s claim that she was raped, finding Trump responsible for a lesser degree of sexual abuse. The judgment adds to Trump’s legal woes and offers vindication to Carroll, whose allegations had been mocked and dismissed by Trump for years.

*Nucleus » 17 Jul 2024, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2024, 1:26 pm

I am warning you...
Methboy has been on this board non-stop since 5:02 a.m. today..

Really?