over 125 posts today
No...the verdict was Liable.*Huey » 17 Jul 2024, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑ This is the verdict:
The verdict was split: Jurors rejected Carroll’s claim that she was raped, finding Trump responsible for a lesser degree of sexual abuse. The judgment adds to Trump’s legal woes and offers vindication to Carroll, whose allegations had been mocked and dismissed by Trump for years.
Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2024, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑ No...the verdict was Liable.
The question was whether what he was liable for constituted "rape" as commonly understood. There was no doubt that he committed the act. The judge was clear.
Because the law was inconsistent with broadly accepted definitions. it was thereafter changed to include digital penetration.
Call it The Grifty Law.
There is nothing you will learn about the law from The Five that is worth sharing.
What did THE PRESIDING JUDGE say the jury found?*Huey » 17 Jul 2024, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑ This what the jury found:
The verdict was split: Jurors rejected Carroll’s claim that she was raped, finding Trump responsible for a lesser degree of sexual abuse. The judgment adds to Trump’s legal woes and offers vindication to Carroll, whose allegations had been mocked and dismissed by Trump for years.
THE JURY found him responsible for the letter degree of sexual abuse. THat is what the jury found. I was 100% correct.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2024, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑ Do you have an Associates Degree in Divinity, Duck?
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2024, 8:05 am » wrote: ↑ Share your sources...
How many times are you gonna dance, blithely, onto that rake?
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
He usually starts around 5 am and stays til around 9 pm... seven days a week.*Nucleus » 17 Jul 2024, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑ I am warning you...
Methboy has been on this board non-stop since 5:02 a.m. today..
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2024, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑ How many of these "fraudulent" ballots have been found?
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2024, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑ How many of these "fraudulent" ballots have been found?
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2024, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑ Your credit is no good.
If you want to pay in advance, I'll answer your question.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!