Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2024, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑ You're such a **** loser.
the letter -- a brief, one-sentence statement backing the candidate -- to establish that there are some ideas behind Trump's candidacy.The letter reads, "Given our choices in the presidential election, we believe that Donald J. Trump is the candidate most likely to restore the promise of America, and we urge you to support him as we do."It also features former politicians with scholarly credentials such as Newt Gingrich and Bill Bennett, and others such as Peter Thiel, the PayPal co-founder and Facebook board member who bankrolled former wrestler Hulk Hogan's lawsuit against Gawker Media, and Charles C. Johnson, a right-wing blogger known for aggressive trolling on Twitter before he was banned from the website.
Joshua Dunn, chair of the department of political science at the University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, said the list of names is probably so broad because of the difficulty of finding university-based scholars to back a candidate who has become toxic even to many in his own party. Dunn, who co-wrote a book about conservatives in academe, said conservative faculty members are typically pro-free trade, pro-free market and skeptical of populist movements, whereas Trump has run a populist campaign espousing protectionist principles.
"You're going to have trouble rounding up many conservative faculty members," he said.
Dunn said even many who have signed the letter may not be terribly enthusiastic about Trump.
"Instead they're afraid of a Clinton presidency, so they kind of regard him as the least worst option for this election," he said.
******* Lying Piece of ****,*Vegas » 20 Jul 2024, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑ Whoops...My bad![]()
![]()
![]()
Given how many times that you have posted articles that you knew were biased, I don't feel too bad. At least my post wasn't intentional on my part.
This point stays: Americans also have valid opinions. Not just your stupid experts.
1. We both know that you will repost my mistake 600 times from here on out. It's what narcissists do. Just remember, I will do the same with you deliberate lie about Clinton's accusations.
Yours is a stupid 0bjection.*Huey » 20 Jul 2024, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑ What a stupid question.
It may explain why, when Pubs ranked trump 43, he ended 45th.
There's some linear reasoning.*rippy38 » 20 Jul 2024, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑ I see you've now resorted to the nonsensical reply strategy.
Your concession has been accepted... again.
Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2024, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑ Yours is a stupid 0bjection.
And your math sucks.
There are likely to be 4 categories
Republican, Democrat, Independent, Undeclared.
It is obvious that even Republicans acknowledge that Grifty sucks.
What do you then proceed to do, ya lying ******* ******?*Vegas » 20 Jul 2024, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑ What the **** does my first sentence say you dumb ****?
God man. You can't even read past 2 words.
We both know that you are going to bring up my mistake 500 times a month. Narcissists can't help it.
Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2024, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑ What do you then proceed to do, ya lying ******* ******?
No, Reframy...*Huey » 20 Jul 2024, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑ This on is perfect. The topic is Presidential rankings. Yet, the 13th ranked president is being pressured to step aside by legislators, votes and big time donors. This is also included the 6th ranked President.
Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2024, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑ No, Reframy...
This is about presidents RELATIVE TO OTHER PRESIDENTS, not a thread about Millard Fillmore.

I smell a VeggieTale coming.Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2024, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑ There's some linear reasoning.
Are you aware that @*VegasVagina has already thrown you under the bus?
Why is that "unfortunate"?*Huey » 20 Jul 2024, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑ Likely. That is speculation. They probably are. But unfortunately they didn't break it down that was according to your citation:
Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush and Trump were more likely to be ranked higher by conservatives or Republicans, with Reagan being ranked an average of 5th by Republicans respondents, Bush 19th and Trump 41st. Among Democrat respondents, Reagan was rated an average of 18th, Bush 33rd and Trump 45th.
A similar partisan divide was noticeable for Barack Obama and President Biden, who ranked an average of 6th and 13th, respectively, among Democrat respondents, and 15th and 30th by Republicans. Bill Clinton, a Democrat, was ranked higher by Republican respondents (10th) than he was by Democrats (12th).
*******...*rippy38 » 20 Jul 2024, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑ I smell a VeggieTale coming.
https://i.postimg.cc/ZqYyntpn/caa9d1583 ... c0f353.jpg
Obviously not.*Huey » 20 Jul 2024, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑
I know what it is about. The elites of your party are trying circumvent the democratic process and push the 13th ranked President out and you have nothing to say about it.
NeverRunnyQuimmie....*Huey » 20 Jul 2024, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑ While only about 40 Congressional Democrats have publicly called for Biden to drop out, two Democratic House members told the New York Times that 70 percent to 80 percent of their caucus would like Biden to withdraw.
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/20 ... s-growing/
And just what is that supposed to prove?