*Vegas » 22 Jul 2024, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
We have many times. You refuse to see it.
I have proved your first presidential ranking article was ****. Even the article itself admitted it was. You wouldn't have it.
We destroyed you on your Vanity Fair pic. You wouldn't have it.
Huey has kicked your *** so many times with the gun debates. You wouldn't have it.
The list goes on and on....
Here it comes...watch:
1. "That ****."
No....you yammered some idiotic **** about "Survivorship bias"...I have proved your first presidential ranking article was ****.
You're a lying *******.Even the article itself admitted it was. You wouldn't have it.
"Believe my eyes" isn't proof.We destroyed you on your Vanity Fair pic. You wouldn't have it.
the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 designHuey has kicked your *** so many times with the gun debates
Blackvegetable » 22 Jul 2024, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑ No....you yammered some idiotic **** about "Survivorship bias"...
because you're a moron.
It was the dude's boyfriend. POM proved it. You know he did, so don't **** demand that I go dig it up. I am not a stalker like you. I don't creep through other member's profiles."Believe my eyes" isn't proof.
WTF does this have to do with anything. You pull some random **** out of your ***. I am talking about how repeatedly beats your ***.the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design
Debunked.
You have never destroyed anything. You have no idea what you yammer about,*Vegas » 22 Jul 2024, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
Deflection ^^^ Lie. That article was way before we even talked about survivorship bias. That was your second article that I destroyed.
You're a lying *******.
It was the dude's boyfriend. POM proved it. You know he did, so don't **** demand that I go dig it up. I am not a stalker like you. I don't creep through other member's profiles.
WTF does this have to do with anything. You pull some random **** out of your ***. I am talking about how repeatedly beats your ***.
And you are probably lying about this anyway. It's what you do.
1. He will continue to prove my point about not admitting when he was wrong.
QED
Game. Set. Match.
There exists no photo of this "boyfriend". You're lying.It was the dude's boyfriend. POM proved it. You know he did
it demonstrates that you have no idea what that debate is about.WTF does this have to do with anything.
Like I would expect you to admit it. Hence, you cannot admit your errors No narcissists ca, Not one.Blackvegetable » 22 Jul 2024, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑ You have never destroyed anything. You have no idea what you yammer about,
Post the rank afforded Grifty by Republican and conservative respondents to the survey.
See my reply above.There exists no photo of this "boyfriend". You're lying.
it demonstrates that you have no idea what that debate is about.
To whom you lost to.Because you are a moron.
*Vegas » 22 Jul 2024, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Like I would expect you to admit it. Hence, you cannot admit your errors No narcissists ca, Not one.
Game.Set.Match. QED. Loser
See my reply above.
To whom you lost to.
And again you **** redundant piece of ****:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk&t=1s
Loses battle with ONE preposition.To whom you lost to.
*Vegas » 22 Jul 2024, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Why are you always saying such stupid ****? You don't even know the meaning of the word.
To whom you lost to
Prove it.*Vegas » 22 Jul 2024, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, because you write so impeccably well.
I am always having to dumb **** down for you.
Veggie is losing it... seriously!*Vegas » 22 Jul 2024, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑ What do I get in return? You never prove your ****, but demand others to provide evidence.
Therefore, you need to pay a price.
1. 'Post the rule on that"![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
*******.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
Because you ignore the whole results from this crap. You focus on talking points per hour, not that the job has employees' hours cut so they have to find more part time jobs which most retail employers screw with schedules so much nobody has a regular work week to get a second or third job that is managed the same way.