*rippy38 » 24 Jul 2024, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ Does anyone really think this will stop the Dems from claiming this cash as theirs and using it as they wish?
Trump files FEC complaint over Biden transferring campaign war chest to Kamala Harris
“Kamala Harris is seeking to perpetrate a $91.5 million heist of Joe Biden’s leftover campaign cash — a brazen money grab that would constitute the single largest excessive contribution and biggest violation in the history of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971," Trump campaign counsel David Warrington wrote in the eight-page filing, per The Hill.
https://justthenews.com/government/fede ... est-kamala
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Justthenews...*rippy38 » 24 Jul 2024, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ Does anyone really think this will stop the Dems from claiming this cash as theirs and using it as they wish?
Trump files FEC complaint over Biden transferring campaign war chest to Kamala Harris
“Kamala Harris is seeking to perpetrate a $91.5 million heist of Joe Biden’s leftover campaign cash — a brazen money grab that would constitute the single largest excessive contribution and biggest violation in the history of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971," Trump campaign counsel David Warrington wrote in the eight-page filing, per The Hill.
https://justthenews.com/government/fede ... est-kamala
What are your pronouns, Buckwheat?
What's your number, Casanova?
So... Trump's campaign didn't file a complaint with the FEC over the disbursement of Sleepy Joe's campaign war chest?
In his defense, God looked over to Darwin and said "HEY..!! Give me a break...! They were my first batch and I had the oven turned up too high...!!!" .
I'm sure he did....*rippy38 » 24 Jul 2024, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑ So... Trump's campaign didn't file a complaint with the FEC over the disbursement of Sleepy Joe's campaign war chest?
Blackvegetable » 24 Jul 2024, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm sure he did....
Just as he walked around with that **** Me Face on the arm of his groomer.
But "justthenews" is crap.
Just the facts.
Make me believe.GHETTOBLASTER » 24 Jul 2024, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑ We're still waiting to read your rebuttal of the content of what was in that report.
STILL WAITING TO SEE YOUR REBUTTAL

Yeah... almost like this has been planned for a while, huh?OdeToJoy » 24 Jul 2024, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑ It is not the Biden campaign fund. It is the Biden-Harris Campaign Committee Fund. The campaign fund was registered in BOTH their names.
Apparently, they recognized that there might come a time when Joe might have to step down, so they decided to make it a joint campaign fund, and both Biden and Harris have equal access to the campaign funds.
Pretty smart!!!
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/91-mil ... 024-07-18/
CAN THE TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF $95 MILLION BE THAT EASY?
Experts on campaign finance law disagree on whether Harris could be vulnerable to legal challenges. Saurav Ghosh, a lawyer at the Campaign Legal Center, a non-partisan watchdog group, said because Harris was already part of "Biden for President" as the vice presidential candidate, her claim on the money should be secure.
"Anyone challenging the legality of this move has slim odds of success," Ghosh said.
She wasn't running for President and had not yet been nominated as VP.OdeToJoy » 24 Jul 2024, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑ It is not the Biden campaign fund. It is the Biden-Harris Campaign Committee Fund. The campaign fund was registered in BOTH their names.
Seems to me that in getting rid of Kamalalala, the dems would forfeit use of $95M.OdeToJoy » 24 Jul 2024, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑ It is not the Biden campaign fund. It is the Biden-Harris Campaign Committee Fund. The campaign fund was registered in BOTH their names.
Apparently, they recognized that there might come a time when Joe might have to step down, so they decided to make it a joint campaign fund, and both Biden and Harris have equal access to the campaign funds.
Pretty smart!!!
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/91-mil ... 024-07-18/
CAN THE TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF $95 MILLION BE THAT EASY?
Experts on campaign finance law disagree on whether Harris could be vulnerable to legal challenges. Saurav Ghosh, a lawyer at the Campaign Legal Center, a non-partisan watchdog group, said because Harris was already part of "Biden for President" as the vice presidential candidate, her claim on the money should be secure.
"Anyone challenging the legality of this move has slim odds of success," Ghosh said.
In dem control put to dem uses. That's why they don't really care - the money is a distraction.DeezerShoove » 24 Jul 2024, 9:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Seems to me that in getting rid of Kamalalala, the dems would forfeit use of $95M.
It has to go elsewhere like a PAC.
No, the biggest reason is she's a tar baby. Unloading a female pretend *** isn't easy when you've been race bating and virtue signaling. The base can only take so much cognitive dissonance.DeezerShoove » 24 Jul 2024, 9:21 pm » wrote: ↑ So, her biggest reason for being "The Candidate" is that the dems can either lose with a bundle of cash
-or-
Get a new candidate and lose while seeking funding.
She's worse than useless - she will make certain Trump wins in a landslide. And all the money in the world won't change that.DeezerShoove » 24 Jul 2024, 9:21 pm » wrote: ↑ She is worthless as a person by all measures except that campaign war chest.
I never said they wouldn't be.Cannonpointer » 24 Jul 2024, 9:31 pm » wrote: ↑ In dem control put to dem uses. That's why they don't really care - the money is a distraction.
No, the biggest reason is she's a tar baby. Unloading a female pretend *** isn't easy when you've been race bating and virtue signaling. The base can only take so much cognitive dissonance.
She's worse than useless - she will make certain Trump wins in a landslide. And all the money in the world won't change that.
Whoever is nominated will be funded, trust and believe.
Rita also has sought NATO escalation in Ukraine.DeezerShoove » 24 Jul 2024, 9:59 pm » wrote: ↑ I never said they wouldn't be.
Only that in the first case the mountain of money doesn't even have to be channeled.
It's already Kaka's. (My new nickname for her. Feel free to help me make it "stick"... )![]()
Rita's usually on point about us dumbasses...
https://youtu.be/sNHCCM-OzeM?si=byXa7QiH6kUL4RgX