Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 25 Jul 2024, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jul 2024, 9:28 am

The judge made clear in her 21-page ruling that she wasn’t weighing in – one way or the other – on the merits of Trump’s claim that he was defamed by ABC News, and wasn’t trying to suggest that he’ll win the case.

Ibid.

*Huey » 25 Jul 2024, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jul 2024, 9:30 am

So, as the citation states, the judge is is not dismissing the case.  Thanks for wasting forum space with that crap.

Blackvegetable » 25 Jul 2024, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jul 2024, 9:33 am

Share your feefees with someone who cares.

Blackvegetable » 25 Jul 2024, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jul 2024, 9:28 am

The judge made clear in her 21-page ruling that she wasn’t weighing in – one way or the other – on the merits of Trump’s claim that he was defamed by ABC News, and wasn’t trying to suggest that he’ll win the case.

Ibid.

*Huey » 25 Jul 2024, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jul 2024, 9:35 am

Run, BC, run.  LMAO!

Beekeeper » 25 Jul 2024, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jul 2024, 9:37 am

She didn't dismiss the case BECAUSE there was NO MERIT IN THE ABC claim that it was one they would win!! 

Nice deflection, ****, but the FACT IS, your claim that Trump is a RAPIST HAS NO MERIT BASED IN ZERO FACTS!! In this nation, the JURY has the FINAL WORD. PERIOD!! **** off, DICKBREATH, YOU LOST!!

Blackvegetable » 25 Jul 2024, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jul 2024, 9:38 am

Your feefees don't matter....what is to run from?

It's not as if you will take a stand.

Beekeeper » 25 Jul 2024, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jul 2024, 7:00 am

And the reason being.......

 (via NY Post): 

Former president Barack Obama hasn’t endorsed Kamala Harris’ presidential bid because he doesn’t think she can beat Donald Trump, according to a source close to the Biden family.

 Following Joe Biden’s shock resignation from the race on Sunday, and his immediate endorsement of the vice president, most of the Democratic elite have been quick to rally behind Harris — but Obama is a notable exception. 

 “Obama’s very upset because he knows she can’t win,” the Biden family source told The Post. 

 “Obama knows she’s just incompetent — the border czar who never visited the border, saying that all migrants should have health insurance. She cannot navigate the landmines that are ahead of her.” 

 The turning point for Biden, 81, came after his disastrous performance against Trump in a televised debate in Atlanta last month which, The Post first revealed, was part of an “elaborate set-up” to remove him from the race. 

 But the source doesn’t have high hopes for a TV debate between Trump and Harris. When Biden was still in the race, a second debate was scheduled for September 10. 

 “Wait until the debate… She can’t debate. She’s going to put her foot in her mouth about Israel, Palestine, Ukraine. She’s going to say something really stupid,” the source said. 

 “Obama knew this was going to happen, Joe knew this was going to happen. Now she is going to have to answer real questions.” The White House did not respond to The Post’s request for comment on this story. 

And NOW our boy @maineman  is going to be REALLY PISSED that his KNEEGROW GOD isn't on board that SINKING SHIP call DEMOCRATS!!

Blackvegetable » 25 Jul 2024, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jul 2024, 9:24 am

Where is the link to this ****?

Beekeeper » 25 Jul 2024, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jul 2024, 9:42 am

 Altonaga wrote, adding that this case would turn on “whether it is substantially true to say a jury (or juries) found (Trump) liable for rape by a jury despite the jury’s verdict expressly finding he was not liable for rape.”

                   

Seems you found it already, DICKBREATH!!

How's that CUM GUZZLING BUSINESS of yours CUMING along???

                 

Blackvegetable » 25 Jul 2024, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jul 2024, 9:39 am

Fondler,

You can't be made to understand. 

Your selective reading comprehension is abysmal...on the level of the @*Posse...

Blackvegetable » 25 Jul 2024, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jul 2024, 9:45 am

If Grifty stuck his fist up your *** in the absence of your breathless consent (just for the sake of argument, of course), would you consider that "assault" or "rape"?

Blackvegetable » 25 Jul 2024, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jul 2024, 9:45 am

If Grifty stuck his fist up your *** in the absence of your breathless consent (just for the sake of argument, of course), would you consider that "assault" or "rape"?

*Huey » 25 Jul 2024, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jul 2024, 9:48 am

Dum Dum, this is not about what he would consider rape.  It is about what the jury found him liable for, which wasn't rape, and *** claiming the Jury did.

Nod, Reframey

Blackvegetable » 25 Jul 2024, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jul 2024, 9:49 am

Never presume, Verbal.

*Huey » 25 Jul 2024, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jul 2024, 9:50 am

I accept your surrender.  The ST is here.

I didn't presume.  

Try again:

Dum Dum, this is not about what he would consider rape.  It is about what the jury found him liable for, which wasn't rape, and *** claiming the Jury did.

Nod, Reframey

Blackvegetable » 25 Jul 2024, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jul 2024, 9:54 am

Tiny,

You don't have the peas to understand the issue.

This is why you are ALWAYS wrong on matters of Law.

*Huey » 25 Jul 2024, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jul 2024, 9:48 am

Dum Dum, this is not about what he would consider rape.  It is about what the jury found him liable for, which wasn't rape, and *** claiming the Jury did.

Nod, Reframey