Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
The left: Men have no say on abortion issue
The left: Men have no say on abortion issue
By Independent
28 Jul 2024 7:23 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
28 Jul 2024 7:23 pm
28 Jul 2024 7:26 pm
According to the left, if a man wants the child he helped create, and the woman wants no part of it, then she can kill his offspring, in utero, against his wishes.
So much for inclusivity.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
28 Jul 2024 8:46 pm
*rippy38 » 28 Jul 2024, 7:26 pm » wrote: ↑ According to the left, if a man wants the child he helped create, and the woman wants no part of it, then she can kill his offspring, in utero, against his wishes.
So much for inclusivity.
Do men really want the child the mother would discard?
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
28 Jul 2024 9:15 pm
It’s not his body*rippy38 » 28 Jul 2024, 7:26 pm » wrote: ↑ According to the left, if a man wants the child he helped create, and the woman wants no part of it, then she can kill his offspring, in utero, against his wishes.
So much for inclusivity.
28 Jul 2024 10:04 pm
But it is his kid.
Just as much his, as hers.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
28 Jul 2024 10:04 pm
Sure.DeezerShoove » 28 Jul 2024, 8:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Do men really want the child the mother would discard?
I raised mine after their piece of **** mom ducked out.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
28 Jul 2024 10:17 pm
29 Jul 2024 10:01 am
it’s not a kid yet. It’s her body, possession of the cells is 100% with her
29 Jul 2024 10:02 am
29 Jul 2024 10:04 am
They want to control the mom. The baby presents a vehicle for that.DeezerShoove » 28 Jul 2024, 8:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Do men really want the child the mother would discard?
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
29 Jul 2024 10:06 am
No.
It is not his kid.
It's her kid, until it is born.
IF it is born.
Wait, wait - let me google and make sure.
Yup. I googled it. The answer to your argument is no.
Walk it off, son. It's no.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
29 Jul 2024 10:07 am
I'll wager you didn't raise any that she aborted.*rippy38 » 28 Jul 2024, 10:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Sure.
I raised mine after their piece of **** mom ducked out.
Who wants to raise an abortion, except maineman's parents?
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
29 Jul 2024 10:12 am
Right...*rippy38 » 28 Jul 2024, 7:26 pm » wrote: ↑ According to the left, if a man wants the child he helped create, and the woman wants no part of it, then she can kill his offspring, in utero, against his wishes.
So much for inclusivity.
She's staking her life...
You people are such **** idiots.
29 Jul 2024 11:50 am
So then, the father can opt completely of having anything to with the kid emotionally or financially if he doesn't want it.Cannonpointer » 29 Jul 2024, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑ No.
It is not his kid.
It's her kid, until it is born.
IF it is born.
Wait, wait - let me google and make sure.
Yup. I googled it. The answer to your argument is no.
Walk it off, son. It's no.
Since it's her kid.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
29 Jul 2024 12:44 pm
*rippy38 » 29 Jul 2024, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑ So then, the father can opt completely of having anything to with the kid emotionally or financially if he doesn't want it.
Since it's her kid.
the courts don’t think that way….personal responsibility
29 Jul 2024 2:33 pm
That would certainly be equitable, and it is something that I would support. I would go Old Testament, and have the method of disownership be something along the lines of telling her in front of 3 witnesses, "I abort you, I abort you, I abort you." Upon that witnessed utterance and the deliverance of sufficient funds to pay for an abortion, the father would be a father no more.*rippy38 » 29 Jul 2024, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑ So then, the father can opt completely of having anything to with the kid emotionally or financially if he doesn't want it.
Since it's her kid.
Another method could be a certified letter and a notice to the clerk of family court. But going OT is cooler.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
29 Jul 2024 2:52 pm
That's a decent answer.Cannonpointer » 29 Jul 2024, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑ They want to control the mom. The baby presents a vehicle for that.
But my misanthropic side pushes me away from such thinking:
You see, if a mother was going to off the baby anyway,
it doesn't seem to be a very powerful motivator for control of said "mother".
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
29 Jul 2024 3:14 pm
Yes it is. Bigot! Trans men matter!
29 Jul 2024 3:26 pm
29 Jul 2024 4:01 pm
If you can outlaw abortion and force her to term, that's about as controlling as it gets.DeezerShoove » 29 Jul 2024, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑ That's a decent answer.
But my misanthropic side pushes me away from such thinking:
You see, if a mother was going to off the baby anyway,
it doesn't seem to be a very powerful motivator for control of said "mother".
Wanting that, demonizing, moralizing, name calling, besmirching - basically, just being a "born again" Christian in general - is the next best thing.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Who is online
In total there are 4081 users online :: 2 registered, 12 bots, and 4067 guests
Registered users: ROG62, ConservativeWave
Bots: ADmantX, YandexBot, LCC, GPTBot, facebookexternalhit, proximic, CriteoBot, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, curl/7, Googlebot, bingbot