Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2026, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑ And I've posted examples, which you insist don't reflect your stand...
So now you'll need to define your stand because I have literally 100s like them.
:rofl:Huey » 25 Jun 2026, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑ No, you have not. When you finally do don't forget the links.
Your words:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
No one alive can possibly be this stupid...Huey » 25 Jun 2026, 7:23 am » wrote: ↑ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
And we have a runner........
Your words:
viewtopic.php?p=2901066#p2901066
You claim to know. Now you are running from your words.
Not seeing these stands on the what the definition of a women is you claim to know. Just more attempts to reframe.Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2026, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑ No one alive can possibly be this stupid...
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=102709
You believe that there is a fixed definition of woman.Huey » Yesterday, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 11:34 am
Frist you need to tell me what you think I believe in this case. Considering I posted the science.
I know you've taken a few stands on that, but they're birds of a feather.Huey » Yesterday, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 11:52 am
LMAO! Wrong and wrong!
You assume too much.
Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2026, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑ No one alive can possibly be this stupid...
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=102709
Tiny,
Where are you positioned being alive now in genetic outcomes inhabiting space without saying your ancestral lineage, generation gap since birth, geographical location, genetic result of ancestral lineages alive now?Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2026, 6:23 am » wrote: ↑ You keep running from your stand.
You've been asked to post it, but .....you know......****.