Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2024, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2024, 6:48 am

https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/05/politics ... index.html


The Supreme Court on Monday rejected an effort by Missouri’s Republican attorney general to lift a gag order and delay the sentencing of former President Donald Trump following his conviction in the New York hush money case.Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey attempted to file the longshot suit against New York in early July, claiming in part that the gag order violated the First Amendment rights of voters in his state to hear Trump speak.

Apparently this MAGA twat needs a refresher course on the limits of his jurisdiction. And his constituents deserve a rebate.

"Deep State", my ***.
 
 

The trial is done in a federal court. that's why.

Local crime making national news to keep the population aware what happens to sole ancestors not obeying local laws typecasting everyone alive now.

My sibling that liked to manipulate everyone around even in their own family was trapped into one of these events in 2005. Of course humanity prevailed as usual.

Not really that difficult following a 30:1 compression ratio of chromosomes per reproduction within one's own species each reproduction was never same form dead as arrived rotation added as a fertilized cell.

Every reality's traditional values only respects day of birth, not specifically recorded date of conceived to replace one's previous 4 generation gap contributors to every changing population left alive daily here now.

I discovered the actual means to account for lifetimes added since inception.

what set me in motion to become what I learned in 2007 the actual prophecy of Nostradamus' One Male prediction never naming a sole ancestor ending humanity without harming an ancestor alive.

and below this post arrives the other stooge performing the art of nobody knew.

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2024, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2024, 8:10 am

That is NOT the point, Controlly.

Neither is what you think you see.

Here is what I see:

#1 as I said:

The Supreme Court on Monday rejected an effort by Missouri’s Republican attorney general to lift a gag order and delay the sentencing of former President Donald Trump following his conviction in the New York hush money case.

#2 as I said:

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey attempted to file the longshot suit against New York in early July, claiming in part that the gag order violated the First Amendment rights of voters in his state to hear Trump speak.

#3 as I said:

The Supreme Court has what’s known as “original jurisdiction” in cases involving one state suing another, which means the high court is the first to review the suit. 

Nod.  Or go ahead and tell me I don't see it.  I need some popcorn.

*Huey » 06 Aug 2024, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2024, 8:22 am

Here is what I see:

#1 as I said:

The Supreme Court on Monday rejected an effort by Missouri’s Republican attorney general to lift a gag order and delay the sentencing of former President Donald Trump following his conviction in the New York hush money case.

#2 as I said:

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey attempted to file the longshot suit against New York in early July, claiming in part that the gag order violated the First Amendment rights of voters in his state to hear Trump speak.

#3 as I said:

The Supreme Court has what’s known as “original jurisdiction” in cases involving one state suing another, which means the high court is the first to review the suit. 

Nod.  Or go ahead and tell me I don't see it.  I need some popcorn.

the longshot suit

Why is it described as "longshot"?

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2024, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2024, 8:26 am

Why is it described as "longshot"?

I am not playing your diversion game.  Acknowledge the question was answered that was in the op.

*Huey » 06 Aug 2024, 8:28 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2024, 8:28 am

I am not playing your diversion game.  Acknowledge the question was answered that was in the op.

Need I answer his diversion for you? Because every character serving humanity each next rotation of the planet has assumed nobody can know why they are eternally separated daily here now as humanity will eliminate any ancestor capable of being honest cradle to grave now when openly defying anything else is possible principals leading every alternate reality existing next rotation so far.

Stay on message, the show must go on, never let people see you sweat, always pretend to be the calm one in a maddening crowd demanding human rights to believe life isn't self evident time adapting forward now.

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2024, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2024, 6:48 am

https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/05/politics ... index.html

The Supreme Court on Monday rejected an effort by Missouri’s Republican attorney general to lift a gag order and delay the sentencing of former President Donald Trump following his conviction in the New York hush money case.Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey attempted to file the longshot suit against New York in early July, claiming in part that the gag order violated the First Amendment rights of voters in his state to hear Trump speak.

Apparently this MAGA twat needs a refresher course on the limits of his jurisdiction. And his constituents deserve a rebate.

"Deep State", my ***.

Why is a Manhattan court illegally interfering in a national election. 

You never ask the right questions. 

*Huey » 06 Aug 2024, 8:28 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2024, 8:28 am

I am not playing your diversion game.  Acknowledge the question was answered that was in the op.

I'm quoting your cherry picked excerpt.

Why run from it?

Oh, yea...

That.
But the case was widely viewed as unlikely to gain traction at the Supreme Court in part because of the sweeping implications of allowing a state to intervene in a pending criminal case unfolding in a different state.
 “Allowing Missouri to file this suit for such relief against New York would permit an extraordinary and dangerous end-run around former President Trump’s ongoing state court proceedings,” New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat, argued in written briefs.
 The Supreme Court rejected the suit without comment.


you must stop presuming to reframe threads based on your selective grasp of facts and lack of integrity.
 

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2024, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2024, 8:34 am

I'm quoting your cherry picked excerpt.

Why run from it?

Oh, yea...

That.
But the case was widely viewed as unlikely to gain traction at the Supreme Court in part because of the sweeping implications of allowing a state to intervene in a pending criminal case unfolding in a different state.
 “Allowing Missouri to file this suit for such relief against New York would permit an extraordinary and dangerous end-run around former President Trump’s ongoing state court proceedings,” New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat, argued in written briefs.
 The Supreme Court rejected the suit without comment.

you must stop presuming to reframe threads based on your selective grasp of facts and lack of integrity.

You question was answered.  I did not cherry pick anything.  I posted the reasons why it went before the USSC.  Now that you lost you are reframing.  Acknowledge  you were answered then we can get to your diversion.  

*Huey » 06 Aug 2024, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2024, 8:36 am

You question was answered.  I did not cherry pick anything.  I posted the reasons why it went before the USSC.  Now that you lost you are reframing.  Acknowledge  you were answered then we can get to your diversion.

 

I posted the reasons why it went before the USSC.  Now that you lost you are reframing.  Acknowledge

Post the thread title
 

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2024, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2024, 7:39 am

That's a hell of a case...

Maybe not..

Looks like a complete waste of tax payer resources, to support a political candidate.

LOL, and yet you'll purse your lips and make sucking sounds when tax dollars are used to try and cancel a political opponent. 
You stretch the bounds of hypocrisy like Willy Brown stretched Kameltoe's pie hole.
 

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2024, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2024, 8:40 am

Post the thread title

That has already been answered.  And I just posted it again.  

You can talk to yourself if you can not acknowledge you were answered using your own source.  

*Huey » 06 Aug 2024, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2024, 8:42 am

That has already been answered.  And I just posted it again.  

You can talk to yourself if you can not acknowledge you were answered using your own source.

Take the L.

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2024, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2024, 8:44 am

Take the L.

You won't accept the loss, why should anyone else. there is this constant promise of win win scenarios while life has always been a balancing act adapting forward now equally evolving as individually added the specific rotation conceived every lifetime exists changing from a fertilized cell into a decomposing corpse either digested by the food chain or eventually becomes composted as part of fossil fuels.

Genetic fate since conceived to ancestral destiny after birth is only alive adapting to the moment here.

Your unique brain navigates it serving your social consensus life isn't self evident.

RebelGator » 06 Aug 2024, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2024, 8:42 am

LOL, and yet you'll purse your lips and make sucking sounds when tax dollars are used to try and cancel a political opponent. 
You stretch the bounds of hypocrisy like Willy Brown stretched Kameltoe's pie hole.

when tax dollars are used to try and cancel a political opponent. 

Specifically?

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2024, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2024, 8:55 am

Specifically?

read the post you ignored above the one I quoted. Oh I am on ignore and it doesn't show up on your screen so it never happened in your mind.

Bet I know why you picked the state of Missouri in your title?
its slogan is "Show Me State" to people that mind power of suggesting life isn't self evident.".

Independent » 06 Aug 2024, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2024, 8:33 am

Why is a Manhattan court illegally interfering in a national election. 

You never ask the right questions.

A Manhattan court secured a conviction from a jury on every one of 34 counts....in little more time than it took to read 34 charges.

The gag order was upheld by a NY appellate court.

This isn't a game show.
 

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2024, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2024, 9:02 am

A Manhattan court secured a conviction from a jury on every one of 34 counts....in little more time than it took to read 34 charges.

The gag order was upheld by a NY appellate court.

This isn't a game show.
 

its more corruption daily. I can bring back every deflection you propose to the universal natural order sustaining life daily here so far like you ignoring the missing link in evolution factually covered bp by both evolution theory and intellectual theology combined.

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2024, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2024, 8:44 am

Take the L.

Pass the butter.....

*Huey » 06 Aug 2024, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2024, 9:06 am

Pass the butter.....

What was that Marlon Brando movie with the specific use of butter during the sex scene?

Ironically those antagonized by reality are always between intellectual protagonists top down in a chain of command and an equal antagonist bottom up really doesn't change on the level playing field be it front, back, left, right, north, south, east, west, am. pm, winter, spring, summer, fall, year without a leap day or the one with, race, creed, color, national origin, gender displacement, generation gap arrived, economic status, political leaning, spiritual conviction life isn't self evident daily.

Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2024, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑

06 Aug 2024, 6:48 am

https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/05/politics ... index.html

The Supreme Court on Monday rejected an effort by Missouri’s Republican attorney general to lift a gag order and delay the sentencing of former President Donald Trump following his conviction in the New York hush money case.Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey attempted to file the longshot suit against New York in early July, claiming in part that the gag order violated the First Amendment rights of voters in his state to hear Trump speak.

Apparently this MAGA twat needs a refresher course on the limits of his jurisdiction. And his constituents deserve a rebate.

"Deep State", my ***.

No thoughts, etc...copy/paste

TDS

CNN:      

And again, you proved my media comment.