Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
An honest question to all members that served and will vote Harris / Walz
An honest question to all members that served and will vote Harris / Walz
By *Nucleus
6 Aug 2024 3:08 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
9 Aug 2024 9:59 am
Hey 4F, aka @Nucleus....
Have some balls and address this point, if you dare:
And nobody who's served in uniform for 24 years is "abandoning" anyone when they finally decide to hang up their service uniforms for the last time. Every year, a whole **** of soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines retire from military service after long and faithful careers, and a whole **** of new recruits begin to follow in their footsteps. It's been working that way since the end of the 18th century.
Have some balls and address this point, if you dare:
And nobody who's served in uniform for 24 years is "abandoning" anyone when they finally decide to hang up their service uniforms for the last time. Every year, a whole **** of soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines retire from military service after long and faithful careers, and a whole **** of new recruits begin to follow in their footsteps. It's been working that way since the end of the 18th century.
9 Aug 2024 10:15 am
^^Impotent wimpmaineman » 09 Aug 2024, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑ You say "ME"???
So it WAS a selfie? You are actually admitting to being a horse's ***??????
Classic!!!
I very rarely click on links from MAGA morons.... who KNOWS what weird sites you idiots visit.
My point was ON POINT and you just lined through it because you can't refute it.
What a 4F ****** YOU are!!!
Sure Maine, selfie.
MAINE.. LOOKING FORWARD TO **** AN PISSING ON YOUR GRAVE AND YOUR SERVICE MEANS NOTHING TO ME.
9 Aug 2024 10:17 am
and you see your self as a cat's meow. Your character projection is a real ******.maineman » 09 Aug 2024, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑ You say "ME"???
So it WAS a selfie? You are actually admitting to being a horse's ***??????
Classic!!!
I very rarely click on links from MAGA morons.... who KNOWS what weird sites you idiots visit.
My point was ON POINT and you just lined through it because you can't refute it.
What a 4F ****** YOU are!!!
9 Aug 2024 10:21 am
Maine, is that all you got? The "4F"maineman » 09 Aug 2024, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑ Hey 4F, aka @Nucleus....
Have some balls and address this point, if you dare:
And nobody who's served in uniform for 24 years is "abandoning" anyone when they finally decide to hang up their service uniforms for the last time. Every year, a whole **** of soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines retire from military service after long and faithful careers, and a whole **** of new recruits begin to follow in their footsteps. It's been working that way since the end of the 18th century.
. Maine, your balls are shriveled up like chick peas
“When Tim Walz was asked by his country to go to Iraq, do you know what he did? He dropped out of the Army and allowed his unit to go without him — a fact that he’s been criticized for aggressively by a lot of the people that he served with,” Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, Trump’s running mate and a Marine veteran who served in Iraq, said Wednesday at a news conference in Michigan.
9 Aug 2024 10:22 am
maineman » 09 Aug 2024, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑ To combat veterans like you? I could have sworn you said that you hadn't served, but your Dad had. Do I have you mistaken with someone else, or are you trying to steal a little valor with that first phrase?
and....
Actually, Donald Trump himself defended Tim Walz's handling of the Floyd riots, saying he had done a great job. Have you heard that taped phone call?
And nobody who's served in uniform for 24 years is "abandoning" anyone when they finally decide to hang up their service uniforms for the last time. Every year, a whole **** of soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines retire from military service after long and faithful careers, and a whole **** of new recruits begin to follow in their footsteps. It's been working that way since the end of the 18th century.
Hey DICKBREATH, he QUOTED A NEWSWEEK ARTICLE WITH LINK!!
GO **** YOURSELF, NAZI PIECE OF ****!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
9 Aug 2024 6:30 pm
Of course you cheated. You ILLEGALLY changed voting rules, then used those rules to illegally steal an election.maineman » 09 Aug 2024, 12:24 am » wrote: ↑ nobody cheated. We simply worked harder and got out more votes. And if it had been COVID 17 instead of COVID 19, the death toll under Trump would have been exponentially higher.
Oh, and if it had been Covid 15, it would have been Obama's fault, right?
Moron.
9 Aug 2024 7:26 pm
golfboy » 09 Aug 2024, 6:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Of course you cheated. You ILLEGALLY changed voting rules, then used those rules to illegally steal an election.
Oh, and if it had been Covid 15, it would have been Obama's fault, right?
Moron.
The rules that were changed because of the pandemic did not favor one party over the other. Sorry. Your team was just lazy. Just like they still are. Lazy and stupid.
9 Aug 2024 7:48 pm
You cheated.maineman » 09 Aug 2024, 7:26 pm » wrote: ↑ The rules that were changed because of the pandemic did not favor one party over the other. Sorry. Your team was just lazy. Just like they still are. Lazy and stupid.
Yes or no: Were your rule changes legal?
It's okay, we know you don't care about anything but political power, and "anything goes" as long as you win.
9 Aug 2024 7:52 pm
the rule changes did not favor one party over the other. You could have adapted your GOTV effort to maximize your turnout. You were too lazy to worry about it.golfboy » 09 Aug 2024, 7:48 pm » wrote: ↑ You cheated.
Yes or no: Were your rule changes legal?
It's okay, we know you don't care about anything but political power, and "anything goes" as long as you win.
Stupid.
9 Aug 2024 9:03 pm
Answer the question: Were the rule changes, legal?maineman » 09 Aug 2024, 7:52 pm » wrote: ↑ the rule changes did not favor one party over the other. You could have adapted your GOTV effort to maximize your turnout. You were too lazy to worry about it.
Stupid.
You won't answer the question, because the answer proves you wrong.
9 Aug 2024 9:16 pm
The rules were viewed to be illegal...and the courts all ruled that, regardless, voters who followed the rules and voted in accordance with them should not be disenfranchised. The rules were not party-specific. If you had gotten off your asses and modified your GOTV efforts, you would have had an equal opportunity to use mail-in voting to maximize your turnout. You didn't. You were lazy and unresponsive. Sucks to be you, eh?golfboy » 09 Aug 2024, 9:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Answer the question: Were the rule changes, legal?
You won't answer the question, because the answer proves you wrong.
9 Aug 2024 9:19 pm
They weren't viewed to be illegal. They WERE illegal.maineman » 09 Aug 2024, 9:16 pm » wrote: ↑ The rules were viewed to be illegal...and the courts all ruled that, regardless, voters who followed the rules and voted in accordance with them should not be disenfranchised. The rules were not party-specific. If you had gotten off your asses and modified your GOTV efforts, you would have had an equal opportunity to use mail-in voting to maximize your turnout. You didn't. You were lazy and unresponsive. Sucks to be you, eh?
You cheated.
9 Aug 2024 9:22 pm
golfboy » 09 Aug 2024, 9:19 pm » wrote: ↑ They weren't viewed to be illegal. They WERE illegal.
You cheated.
we didn't cheat. you were lazy. the rules did not benefit democrats, they benefitted intelligent, agile, political campaigns.
9 Aug 2024 9:27 pm
and God only knows, intelligent and agile are not words that ANYONE EVER used to describe MAGA morons!
9 Aug 2024 9:44 pm
You illegally changed the rules.maineman » 09 Aug 2024, 9:22 pm » wrote: ↑ we didn't cheat. you were lazy. the rules did not benefit democrats, they benefitted intelligent, agile, political campaigns.
You cheated.
9 Aug 2024 9:49 pm
did the rules only apply to democrats? Y/N?
9 Aug 2024 9:59 pm
The rule change was illegal.
You cheated.
Just own it, and move on.
9 Aug 2024 10:10 pm
A career as a paper pusher that avoids combat is "service" only in the context of SELF service.maineman » 09 Aug 2024, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑ Hey 4F, aka @Nucleus....
Have some balls and address this point, if you dare:
And nobody who's served in uniform for 24 years is "abandoning" anyone when they finally decide to hang up their service uniforms for the last time. Every year, a whole **** of soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines retire from military service after long and faithful careers, and a whole **** of new recruits begin to follow in their footsteps. It's been working that way since the end of the 18th century.
As one of the people who paid for his panties and pastries, I'd have been happier if the child disturbing cock sucker had died of the drizzling **** and his hor had collected a check for it.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
10 Aug 2024 5:35 am
The CHANGES IN THE RULES, DONE ILLEGALLY, were done so to FAVOR YOUR "GOTV" efforts you ALREADY had in place designed to CHEAT and STEAL ELECTIONS!! It allowed you and your NAZI ILK to use the SAME MAIL IN VOTING METHODS where ILLEGAL BALLOTS could be placed in the hopper for counting. Republicans have no need to cheat to win with MAIL IN/ABSENTEE ballots. There is nothing LAZY about not cheating to win.
DEMOCRATS have used them for DECADES to cheat. Nearly EVERY DEMOCRAT CAUGHT CHEATING TO WIN ELECTIONS HAS BEEN CAUGHT WITH MAIL IN BALLOTS!!
Damn, that sucks for you, huh, mainestain??
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
10 Aug 2024 6:46 am
golfboy » 09 Aug 2024, 9:59 pm » wrote: ↑ The rule change was illegal.
You cheated.
Just own it, and move on.
We DO own the white house and I certainly HAVE moved on. YOU are the guy who is stuck re-re-re-litigating 2020 over and over again. Loser!
Who is online
In total there are 3692 users online :: 10 registered, 16 bots, and 3666 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, Beekeeper, nefarious101, sole, Huey
Bots: DuckDuckBot, DuckDuckGo, proximic, Kinza, LCC, ADmantX, facebookexternalhit, NING, CriteoBot, Applebot, Baiduspider, Mediapartners-Google, YandexBot, Googlebot, curl/7, bingbot