golfboy » 10 Aug 2024, 7:08 pm » wrote: ↑ You illegally changed voting rules, to cheat.
And you don't care because ALL you care about is winning. By any means necessary.
You have no honor, and you don't care how badly you damaged America.
Denier at ^^^^^^^ large, when have you honestly won freedom from adapting as displaced daily only being alive uniquely here adapting to the moment every rotation your body changed form since arrival as an ancestral position to your exact lineage left alive today?golfboy » 10 Aug 2024, 5:00 pm » wrote: ↑ But you're willing to cheat to "win".
I'm not.
You have no honor.
You're a piece of ****, trying to destroy America's voting system.maineman » 11 Aug 2024, 6:59 am » wrote: ↑ You ascribe sinister motives without ANY proof thereof when, in fact, public safety was the driving motivation for rule changes.
Again... winning is the goal of political elections. We win because we believe our party's agenda is better for America. You and your party feel the same way about your agenda. THe difference is: we win more often because we work harder to win.
America is a much better place because of the work of progressive liberalism over the past 120 years. We have women's suffrage, child labor laws, forty-hour work weeks, social security, Environmental protection, Medicare, Medicaid, minimum wage, civil rights, voting rights, disabled people's rights, and on and on and on and on because progressive liberal-minded people worked harder and got more people to vote for their candidates and their platforms than the people who opposed those advances.
If YOUR ideological forebearers had worked harder than mine, women wouldn't vote, blacks wouldn't vote, and children would work in sweatshops and factories pumping dark smoke into a polluted world.
I am PROUD AS HELL of all that hard work, and all those elections won because of it.
maineman » 11 Aug 2024, 6:59 am » wrote: ↑ You ascribe sinister motives without ANY proof thereof when, in fact, public safety was the driving motivation for rule changes.
Again... winning is the goal of political elections. We win because we believe our party's agenda is better for America. You and your party feel the same way about your agenda. THe difference is: we win more often because we work harder to win.
America is a much better place because of the work of progressive liberalism over the past 120 years. We have women's suffrage, child labor laws, forty-hour work weeks, social security, Environmental protection, Medicare, Medicaid, minimum wage, civil rights, voting rights, disabled people's rights, and on and on and on and on because progressive liberal-minded people worked harder and got more people to vote for their candidates and their platforms than the people who opposed those advances.
If YOUR ideological forebearers had worked harder than mine, women wouldn't vote, blacks wouldn't vote, and children would work in sweatshops and factories pumping dark smoke into a polluted world.
I am PROUD AS HELL of all that hard work, and all those elections won because of it.
golfboy » 11 Aug 2024, 7:27 pm » wrote: ↑ You're a piece of ****, trying to destroy America's voting system.
You WANT illegals to vote because you know you can't win elections without cheating.
maineman » 11 Aug 2024, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Liar. I have never supported non-citizens voting in federal elections. Never.
lol. Of course you do.maineman » 11 Aug 2024, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Liar. I have never supported non-citizens voting in federal elections. Never.
golfboy » 11 Aug 2024, 8:17 pm » wrote: ↑ lol. Of course you do.
Your party depends on fraud. You can't win without cheating.
Oh, stfu. You have already admitted that you didn't even vote in your state's primary - don't play, bitch.maineman » 11 Aug 2024, 6:59 am » wrote: ↑ You ascribe sinister motives without ANY proof thereof when, in fact, public safety was the driving motivation for rule changes.
Again... winning is the goal of political elections. We win because we believe our party's agenda is better for America. You and your party feel the same way about your agenda. THe difference is: we win more often because we work harder to win.
America is a much better place because of the work of progressive liberalism over the past 120 years. We have women's suffrage, child labor laws, forty-hour work weeks, social security, Environmental protection, Medicare, Medicaid, minimum wage, civil rights, voting rights, disabled people's rights, and on and on and on and on because progressive liberal-minded people worked harder and got more people to vote for their candidates and their platforms than the people who opposed those advances.
If YOUR ideological forebearers had worked harder than mine, women wouldn't vote, blacks wouldn't vote, and children would work in sweatshops and factories pumping dark smoke into a polluted world.
I am PROUD AS HELL of all that hard work, and all those elections won because of it.
Sure sure Karen. You have defended rule changes that were tossed out by the SCOTUS.maineman » 11 Aug 2024, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Liar. I have never supported non-citizens voting in federal elections. Never.
The proof is your defense of unlawful, unConstitutional rules changes in the five swing states whose vote tallies ended in a flip that was statistically impossible, fifth columnist.
Your hive mentality is glowing like self deception rules everyone in your concepts life isn't self evident time adapting as reproductively positions as ancestrally here now, evolving uniquely alive since rotation of your arrived fertilized cell so many decades ago.Beekeeper » 11 Aug 2024, 7:42 pm » wrote: ↑ NOBODY has the AUTHORITY TO CHANGE RULES no matter the "public safety" **** without LEGISLATIVE ACTION!! That's how a SOCIETY WHERE THE RULE OF LAW IS UPHELD WORKS, ****!!
PERIOD!!! That makes it ILLEGAL and obviously, AS LONG AS YOU WIN, YOU DON'T GIVE 2 **** ABOUT ANYTHING ILLEGAL!!!
Cannonpointer » 11 Aug 2024, 10:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh, stfu. You have already admitted that you didn't even vote in your state's primary - don't play, bitch.![]()
Cannonpointer » 11 Aug 2024, 10:45 pm » wrote: ↑ The proof is your defense of unlawful, unConstitutional rules changes in the five swing states whose vote tallies ended in a flip that was statistically impossible, fifth columnist.
Cannonpointer » 11 Aug 2024, 10:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Sure sure Karen. You have defended rule changes that were tossed out by the SCOTUS.
You are a partisan hack.
maineman » 12 Aug 2024, 6:24 am » wrote: ↑ I never defended rule changes that allowed non-citizens to vote, you admitted dick licker.
You follow orders created honoring social consensus people rather believe life isn't self evident than accept biological results are self evidently eternally separated daily.maineman » 12 Aug 2024, 6:24 am » wrote: ↑ I never defended rule changes that allowed non-citizens to vote, you admitted dick licker.
maineman » 12 Aug 2024, 6:24 am » wrote: ↑ I never defended rule changes that allowed non-citizens to vote, you admitted dick licker.
Last I checked, RFK was opposing them.maineman » 12 Aug 2024, 6:21 am » wrote: ↑ why would I need to vote in my primary when Joe and Pingree were unopposed?