Liberal Forum

murdock » 28 Aug 2024, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2024, 7:19 am

He votes for getting free horse dick.

I am going to destroy your intellectual soul without ever harming your sole time being alive daily. I don't have to track you down either and not knowing who you are is that much easier to accomplish.

Since i already did it and you keep ignoring it happened already.

31st Arrival » Today, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:25 am

I am going to destroy your intellectual soul without ever harming your sole time being alive daily. I don't have to track you down either and not knowing who you are is that much easier to accomplish.

Since i already did it and you keep ignoring it happened already.

I need a babble-ese translator.

murdock » 28 Aug 2024, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2024, 7:21 am

He really enjoys Chinese cock. Especially the young boys.

You enjoy CREAM SUM YUNG GUY PLATTER     
 

*Nucleus » 32 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

32 minutes ago

You enjoy CREAM SUM YUNG GUY PLATTER     
 

A well versed ***. Knows exactly what he wants. But he likes it anally.

murdock » 28 Aug 2024, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2024, 2:18 pm

A well versed ***. Knows exactly what he wants. But he likes it anally.

^^PA
 

*Nucleus » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

^^PA
 

^^MA

murdock » 28 Aug 2024, 5:18 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2024, 5:18 pm

^^MA

SMDWYMAYITHRMF   
 

*Nucleus » Today, 5:30 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:30 pm

SMDWYMAYITHRMF   
 

Imitation: The most sincerest form of flattery. Thanks pal!

murdock » Today, 7:17 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:17 pm

Imitation: The most sincerest form of flattery. Thanks pal!

PAL = Personal *** Licker!

maineman » 17 Aug 2024, 10:32 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2024, 10:32 pm

I know I am gonna vote really soon...well before election day, and I am feeling pretty comfortable that my ballot will help deliver Maine and Maine's first CD for Harris on her way to victory over you and the clown!       Are you gonna storm the capitol on January 6th, like you and your cohorts did last time?  

Slow down a minute, skippy.

In another thread, you were DEFENDING coup plotters storming capitols - and American spies meddling in the affairs of other nations. 

How many standards do you need, child?

The honest answer? "Only two, sir. Only two."
 

BuckNaked » 22 Aug 2024, 7:08 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2024, 7:08 pm

Maine is not a swing state

Correct. The fruitcake's vote is irrelevant. And if he gets a second, as he says he wishes to do, they will BOTH be irrelevant. 

maineman » 22 Aug 2024, 7:17 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2024, 7:17 pm

Well-meaning public officials changed the rules to protect public health amid a deadly global pandemic.  You have ZERO proof of the political philosophies of those officials, and you have ZERO proof that any of those rule changes were created to provide any unfair advantage or benefit to either political party.

https://i.imgflip.com/91qiqt.jpg

maineman » 22 Aug 2024, 7:36 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2024, 7:36 pm

How did the rules benefit only Democrats?  Were Democrats the only citizens allowed to vote by mail, yes or no?

The rules were only changed in the five swing states that democrats "won" - after the polls closed, overcoming massive leads in a manner statistically impossible.

But you know this.

You have already revealed that you have a double standard for partisan reasons, and it can be counted on. 
 

maineman » 22 Aug 2024, 8:01 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2024, 8:01 pm

come on up.  do your heirs a favor and only buy a one-way ticket, ******.

Are you from the blackvegetable school of call outs?

I'll bet you are, liver lips.       
 

maineman » 22 Aug 2024, 8:18 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2024, 8:18 pm

golfboy » 22 Aug 2024, 8:13 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2024, 8:13 pm

Why was it Democrats that ILLEGALLY changed the rules?

can't answer the simple question

No one thought you could, weakness.

BooRadley » 23 Aug 2024, 6:17 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2024, 6:17 am

maineman » 23 Aug 2024, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2024, 6:12 am

to protect ALL citizens in the midst of a global pandemic.  Why do you keep asking the same dumb questions over and over again?

Then why let in 10 million illegals and they don't have to take the vaccine??

Now, THIS^ rather puts the lie to your ****, mainey.

The pretense that the rules change was out of respect for the DEADLY CHYNA VIRUS is brought solidly to ground by the fact that those SAME DEMOC RATS opened our border and even transported unvaxed illegals to the four corners of our nation and the hinterlands.

So you are telling a bald faced lie when you claim that it was "cuz covud."
 

Cannonpointer » 28 Aug 2024, 8:55 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2024, 8:55 pm

Slow down a minute, skippy.

In another thread, you were DEFENDING coup plotters storming capitols - and American spies meddling in the affairs of other nations. 

How many standards do you need, child?

The honest answer? "Only two, sir. Only two."
 

Gee my instincts are picking up that your last question and answer suggests your brain caught onto my 1,064 methods humanity uses against 8.12 billion ancestors daily each generation gap for the last 7,000 years.

the missing links in evolution are sustained by reasonable doubt governing by every level of chain and command links to one deep state of mind secret that allows minority rule over majority of lifetimes living here daily genetics has always kept eternally separated in plain sight.

Cannonpointer » 28 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm

The rules were only changed in the five swing states that democrats "won" - after the polls closed, overcoming massive leads in a manner statistically impossible.

But you know this.

You have already revealed that you have a double standard for partisan reasons, and it can be counted on.

How was it "statistically IMPOSSIBLE?"

Democrats were pounding their voter lists with telephone calls urging them to vote by mail.  Republicans were attending super-spreader rallies and vowing to vote en masse on election day.  

On election day, the machine tallies arrived immediately after the polls closed.  Big lead for Republicans.  Poll workers then started counting the mail-in ballots.  Red mirage.  Slow rolling blue tsunami.  Your side could very well have pounded YOUR voter lists and repeatedly nagged YOUR voters to vote by mail.  Better luck next time. The rules did NOT explicitly benefit one party over the other.  One was simply more nimble... the other was stupidly lethargic.
 
I mean, seriously, it wasn't like the rules were changed in secret, and only Democrats were let in on it.

maineman » 29 Aug 2024, 6:58 am » wrote: ↑

29 Aug 2024, 6:58 am

How was it "statistically IMPOSSIBLE?"

Democrats were pounding their voter lists with telephone calls urging them to vote by mail.  Republicans were attending super-spreader rallies and vowing to vote en masse on election day.  

On election day, the machine tallies arrived immediately after the polls closed.  Big lead for Republicans.  Poll workers then started counting the mail-in ballots.  Red mirage.  Slow rolling blue tsunami.  Your side could very well have pounded YOUR voter lists and repeatedly nagged YOUR voters to vote by mail.  Better luck next time. The rules did NOT explicitly benefit one party over the other.  One was simply more nimble... the other was stupidly lethargic.
 
I mean, seriously, it wasn't like the rules were changed in secret, and only Democrats were let in on it.

your **** cheated and you **** know it.... WILL NOT HAPPEN AGAIN

maineman » 29 Aug 2024, 6:58 am » wrote: ↑

29 Aug 2024, 6:58 am

How was it "statistically IMPOSSIBLE?"

The last time you challenged me, I did the work and proved my case.

You panty danced.

I won't do the work and make my case for you again. I'll just say it, and you'll just take it and like it.