Liberal Forum

Independent » 07 Aug 2024, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 10:08 am

Woke or not woke?

You decide.

https://x.com/akafacehots/status/182090 ... QGmg7tOueQ

Buffalo » 07 Aug 2024, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 7:32 am

The Morning Briefing: Two Commies Walk Into a Presidential Ticket...

STEPHEN KRUISER | 12:42 AM ON AUGUST 07, 2024

A couple of weeks ago at our sister site HotAir, my friend and colleague Ed Morrissey wrote that the anointment of Harris as their nominee completed the "divorce" between the Democratic Party and the working class they use to claim to champion. 

Choosing Walz as a running mate is the Dems giving a big middle finger to flyover country and any centrist, undecided voters who may be there. 

Minnesota isn't just blue; it routinely elects pro-terrorism lefties like Keith Ellison and Ilhan Omar. They're already trying to paint Walz as some sort of salt-of-the-earth Midwestern flannel bro. He's from the state that birthed the "defund the police" insanity. As Rick wrote, Walz's role in the George Floyd Summer of Love and Mostly Peaceful Riots and Looting makes him unfit for the Veep role. It also makes him unfit to be Minnesota's governor but, once again, the state is plagued by an idiotic electorate. 

This "off the commie cliff" ticket that the Democrats are going with is a gift to the Trump-Vance campaign as it pursues voters who are regular folks who live outside of the coastal proggie bubbles. The Dems have decided to fly their commie freak flag at the top of the presidential ticket. Walz, after all, is the guy who said that socialism is just "neighborliness." 

Maybe if your neighbors have a massive body count. 

Once again, Trump's campaign ads are practically writing themselves. My Townhall colleague Mia Cathell posted a list of some of the insane things that Walz has said and done.

The gift horse is here; let's hope the GOP isn't overcome by the urge to peek in its mouth.

Full article:
The Morning Briefing: Two Commies Walk Into a Presidential Ticket... – PJ Media

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2024, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 12:37 pm

Can you name the last Democrat running for POTUS  who WASN'T "the most radical candidate ever"?

*Huey » 07 Aug 2024, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 12:50 pm

Clinton and maybe Gore.

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2024, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 1:34 pm

In 1992 the Democrats nominated then-Arkansas Gov. Bill Clinton as their standard-bearer. But commentator Pat Buchanan, who had run a surprisingly robust primary challenge against incumbent President George H.W. Bush, was unconvinced. The Democratic Party convention at Madison Square Garden the month prior was made up of “liberals and radicals... dressed up as moderates and centrists—in the greatest single exhibition of cross-dressing in American political history.”

This “Culture War” speech, which observers subsequently blamed in part for Bush’s defeat in the fall, further labeled Hillary Clinton an advocate of “radical feminism.” The GOP platform that year contained four references to socialism, despite the recent collapse of the Soviet Union.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/republica ... r-60-years

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2024, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 1:34 pm

In 1992 the Democrats nominated then-Arkansas Gov. Bill Clinton as their standard-bearer. But commentator Pat Buchanan, who had run a surprisingly robust primary challenge against incumbent President George H.W. Bush, was unconvinced. The Democratic Party convention at Madison Square Garden the month prior was made up of “liberals and radicals... dressed up as moderates and centrists—in the greatest single exhibition of cross-dressing in American political history.”

This “Culture War” speech, which observers subsequently blamed in part for Bush’s defeat in the fall, further labeled Hillary Clinton an advocate of “radical feminism.” The GOP platform that year contained four references to socialism, despite the recent collapse of the Soviet Union.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/republica ... r-60-years

Can you name the last Democrat running for POTUS  who WASN'T "the most radical candidate ever"?

*Huey » 07 Aug 2024, 1:44 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 1:44 pm

Well, I deployed in 92 plus I was station overseas until 96.  No internet, only stars and stipes and AFN.  Neither of which got political.  But, I don't see this:

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2024, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 2:11 pm

And, in spite of believing that he decimated the military, you now insist you voted for him twice.

*Huey » 07 Aug 2024, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 2:14 pm

The extent of his cuts were not fully felt until after his 2nd election.  And if you wish to have that argument, start a thread.  ANd when you post what you claimed I said without links or context those posts will be ignored.

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2024, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 1:34 pm

In 1992 the Democrats nominated then-Arkansas Gov. Bill Clinton as their standard-bearer. But commentator Pat Buchanan, who had run a surprisingly robust primary challenge against incumbent President George H.W. Bush, was unconvinced. The Democratic Party convention at Madison Square Garden the month prior was made up of “liberals and radicals... dressed up as moderates and centrists—in the greatest single exhibition of cross-dressing in American political history.”

This “Culture War” speech, which observers subsequently blamed in part for Bush’s defeat in the fall, further labeled Hillary Clinton an advocate of “radical feminism.” The GOP platform that year contained four references to socialism, despite the recent collapse of the Soviet Union.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/republica ... r-60-years

Sumela » 07 Aug 2024, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 11:23 am

They are not Communists.

Dumb

Buffalo » 07 Aug 2024, 5:38 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 5:38 pm

The cackling bitch is a goddamn communist!!!

https://x.com/i/status/1819482234065150252

Sumela » 07 Aug 2024, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 8:08 pm

****.  

She is a neo-liberal who serves

the MIC and the Empire.

Buffalo » 07 Aug 2024, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 8:12 pm

She may serve "the MIC and the Empire" but she is still a goddamn **** communist!!!  And waltz is a goddamn traitor commie chink ***-kisser!!!

Buffalo » 07 Aug 2024, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 7:32 am

The Morning Briefing: Two Commies Walk Into a Presidential Ticket...

STEPHEN KRUISER | 12:42 AM ON AUGUST 07, 2024

A couple of weeks ago at our sister site HotAir, my friend and colleague Ed Morrissey wrote that the anointment of Harris as their nominee completed the "divorce" between the Democratic Party and the working class they use to claim to champion. 

Choosing Walz as a running mate is the Dems giving a big middle finger to flyover country and any centrist, undecided voters who may be there. 

Minnesota isn't just blue; it routinely elects pro-terrorism lefties like Keith Ellison and Ilhan Omar. They're already trying to paint Walz as some sort of salt-of-the-earth Midwestern flannel bro. He's from the state that birthed the "defund the police" insanity. As Rick wrote, Walz's role in the George Floyd Summer of Love and Mostly Peaceful Riots and Looting makes him unfit for the Veep role. It also makes him unfit to be Minnesota's governor but, once again, the state is plagued by an idiotic electorate. 

This "off the commie cliff" ticket that the Democrats are going with is a gift to the Trump-Vance campaign as it pursues voters who are regular folks who live outside of the coastal proggie bubbles. The Dems have decided to fly their commie freak flag at the top of the presidential ticket. Walz, after all, is the guy who said that socialism is just "neighborliness." 

Maybe if your neighbors have a massive body count. 

Once again, Trump's campaign ads are practically writing themselves. My Townhall colleague Mia Cathell posted a list of some of the insane things that Walz has said and done.

The gift horse is here; let's hope the GOP isn't overcome by the urge to peek in its mouth.

Full article:
The Morning Briefing: Two Commies Walk Into a Presidential Ticket... – PJ Media

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2024, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 4:11 pm

*Huey » 07 Aug 2024, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 2:14 pm

The extent of his cuts were not fully felt until after his 2nd election.  And if you wish to have that argument, start a thread.  ANd when you post what you claimed I said without links or context those posts will be ignored.

Tiny,

We went through that **** in detail.

You lost.
 

 

*Huey » 08 Aug 2024, 4:52 am » wrote: ↑

08 Aug 2024, 4:52 am

Huh, you are making false assertions again.  Carry on Pinocchio.

BuckNaked » 07 Aug 2024, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2024, 9:25 am

why is jawjaw on the list?