Liberal Forum

Bidencrimefamily » 13 Aug 2024, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2024, 8:03 am

Harris did a livesteam just fine.

Elon musk had real problems doing it.

Why was Musk having so much trohble?

Difference between unorganized incoming details and orchestrated resulting outcome as a predictable whole.

31stArrival » 13 Aug 2024, 8:11 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2024, 8:11 am

Difference between unorganized incomes and orchestrated outcome.

Spitting slurring and **** on himself. 

Thats what people his age do. 
 

Bidencrimefamily » 13 Aug 2024, 4:16 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2024, 4:16 am

He needs to make sure his dentures are in correctly 

It was horrible 

Dentures trended on the internet afterwards. Jesus christ.

You're smoking crack
 

Cedar » 13 Aug 2024, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2024, 8:12 am

Im smoking crack

Just say no to drugs dude. 
 

Bidencrimefamily » 13 Aug 2024, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2024, 8:12 am

Spitting slurring and **** on himself. 

Thats what people his age do. 
 

When you going to learn vocabulary is recited events, instincts navigate life never same results as before, again. Current events are the future evolving of everything that survived so far simply adapting to compounding changes of every individual thing here.

Climate change works differently on every latitude in this atmosphere daily becomes a new total.sum devolved so far and your mind won't accept your chromosomes work the same way as periodic elements do as this planet your chromosomes work 23 strands of series parallel lifetimes ancestrally linked DNA here today.
Vocabulary works for those using same language regardless how many separate languages used within a species daily per time zone/temperate zone grid on a map or globe symbol of this planet perpetually balancing as this unique universal position all the time every ancestor is a unique result left alive here.

the great instinctive accountability your intellectual we believe mind won't accept daily. And will shun, exile, or execute anyone not complying to reasonable doubt tomorrow.

Bidencrimefamily » 13 Aug 2024, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2024, 8:13 am

Just say no to drugs dude.

Elon offered Harris the same platform, why is she too chicken **** to accept it. Probably because she can't form a coherent thought without a teleprompter. Now she turned down an interview with Time. She got no game, only media propaganda.
 

Bidencrimefamily » 13 Aug 2024, 4:16 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2024, 4:16 am

He needs to make sure his dentures are in correctly 

It was horrible 

Dentures trended on the internet afterwards. Jesus christ.

No way 

Bidencrimefamily » 13 Aug 2024, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2024, 8:12 am

Spitting slurring and **** on himself. 

Thats what people his age do.

And you would know because he lives inside your **** head!!!   I bet you could even smell the **** you lying sack oif liberal ****!!! LOL!!!
 

Cedar » 13 Aug 2024, 8:19 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2024, 8:19 am

Elon offered Harris the same platform, why is she too chicken **** to accept it. Probably because she can't form a coherent thought without a teleprompter. Now she turned down an interview with Time. She got no game, only media propaganda.

she does no interviews with white people 

Bidencrimefamily » 13 Aug 2024, 4:16 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2024, 4:16 am

He needs to make sure his dentures are in correctly 

It was horrible 

Dentures trended on the internet afterwards. Jesus christ.

Bidencrimefamily » 09 Aug 2024, 4:22 am » wrote: ↑
09 Aug 2024, 4:22 am
Some of the highest surpluses. 

Man knows how to take care of the budget.
budget.unlike trump.

"What changed over the winter?
Tax revenue is up, especially in corporate profits, while spending estimates are largely unchanged.
While the structural budgetary balance has improved, spending is still projected to exceed revenue through fiscal year 2027.

State tax revenue for the 2024-25 biennium is projected to be $61 billion and $64.8 billion in the 2026-27 biennium. Meanwhile, spending is projected at $70.53 billion in the 2024-25 biennium and $66.29 billion in the 2026-27 biennium." 



This paragraph from your link is proof that you are too stupid to understand the things that you post...!!!


 

ROG62 » 13 Aug 2024, 5:43 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2024, 5:43 am

sounds like yer confused and were watching reruns of joe...

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... r-AA1oFO1a

Cedar » 13 Aug 2024, 8:19 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2024, 8:19 am

Elon offered Harris the same platform, why is she too chicken **** to accept it. Probably because she can't form a coherent thought without a teleprompter. Now she turned down an interview with Time. She got no game, only media propaganda.

Why would Harris go on a totally biased platform owned by a guy who has publicly pledged his moral and fiscal support for her opponent?

Do you honestly think that Trump would do two hours on the Rachel Maddow show?
 

maineman » 13 Aug 2024, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2024, 11:10 am

Why would Harris go on a totally biased platform owned by a guy who has publicly pledged his moral and fiscal support for her opponent?

Do you honestly think that Trump would do two hours on the Rachel Maddow show?
 

Live feed? No microphone cut off on Don While Rach can talk over him all the time 2 hours?

GHETTOBLASTER » 13 Aug 2024, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2024, 10:19 am

"What changed over the winter?
Tax revenue is up, especially in corporate profits, while spending estimates are largely unchanged.
While the structural budgetary balance has improved, spending is still projected to exceed revenue through fiscal year 2027.

State tax revenue for the 2024-25 biennium is projected to be $61 billion and $64.8 billion in the 2026-27 biennium. Meanwhile, spending is projected at $70.53 billion in the 2024-25 biennium and $66.29 billion in the 2026-27 biennium." 

This paragraph from your link is proof that you are too stupid to understand the things that you post...!!!

Ax tampon Tim about squandering a state’s surplus 

maineman » 13 Aug 2024, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2024, 11:10 am

Why would Harris go on a totally biased platform owned by a guy who has publicly pledged his moral and fiscal support for her opponent?

Do you honestly think that Trump would do two hours on the Rachel Maddow show?

Trump has done multiple  interviews with a hostile press, JD Vance did 3 on Sunday, while Walz "avoided the press like it was a deployment."  
 

Cedar » 13 Aug 2024, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2024, 11:27 am

Trump has done multiple  interviews with a hostile press, JD Vance did 3 on Sunday, while Walz "avoided the press like it was a deployment."

Panic posts are the best posts. 

Thanks for the laughs. 

     
 

Bidencrimefamily » 13 Aug 2024, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2024, 11:29 am

Panic posts are the best posts. 

Thanks for the laughs. 

   

Whatever you say, driftwood? is your name Harry by any chance?
 

Buck Naked » 13 Aug 2024, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

13 Aug 2024, 11:20 am

Ax tampon Tim about squandering a state’s surplus 

Surpluses are counted when figuring out budgets to continuing resolutions, but when bills get paid after the projected revenues don't show up. there goes the surplus that actually never existed in real time.

Wonder if age old Trump **** himself during the interview.

Elon Musk hosted Trump for a candid talk that everyone could listen to for free. Come see how the media framed it.

Ian Haworth
·
Aug 13, 2024 · NottheBee.com

Last night, Elon Musk hosted Donald Trump for an hours-long candid conversation that was accessible for free.

And, of course, the legacy media elite were furious.

Despite a Washington Post journalist actually asking whether the federal government could prevent the interview from happening ...

https://twitter.com/i/status/1823126481158947026


... the conversation went ahead.

Now, you'd think that free information for voters is a good thing? And you'd think that as beneficiaries of the First Amendment, the press would be celebrating more speech, not less? And you'd also think they'd ask whether they have any interest in questioning if Kamala Harris would accept Elon Musk's invitation to speak ...

Well, why bother when you can whip out the propaganda hammer and go to town on reality.

Here's my personal favorite from Rex Huppke at USA Today: "Trump rambles, slurs his way through Elon Musk interview. It was an unmitigated disaster."


For a fascism-curious billionaire who loves cuddling up to right-wing loons, Elon Musk sure is good at making right-wing politicians look stupid.

Former President Donald Trump had loudly trumpeted a planned Monday night interview with Musk that would stream on X. But much like the disastrous X-platformed launch of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis' presidential campaign, the Musk/Trump interview failed to launch, leaving social media users laughing at the collective incompetence.

Since Vice President Kamala Harris rose to the top of the Democratic presidential ticket last month, Trump's reelection campaign has been flailing. His childish attacks against her aren't working. His racist comments about her mixed-race heritage have repelled all but his most loyal supporters. His vice presidential pick, JD Vance, becomes less likable every time he speaks.

It seems like "fascism-curious" is the only type of "-curious" that's not allowed these days ...

Politico and the Guardian were not as blunt as Huppke, but were more or less pushing the same.



Don't you hate it when billionaire-owned media doesn't shill for the Democratic Party? Makes this whole election business such a headache.

https://notthebee.com/article/the-world ... -framed-it