Why is Calling Kamala a DEI Hire Bad?

1 7 8 9 10 11 14
User avatar
Cannonpointer
15 Aug 2024 10:44 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
45,616 posts
Blackvegetable » 15 Aug 2024, 10:38 am » wrote: What, exactly, is your theory here?

That a publication with a readership of 1.25 million, and a very deep pocketed owner, would appropriate the names of the archive and photographer, identify one of the subjects as the readily litigious Wee Donnie....and all affected parties just let it slide?

Is that it?
My theory - and buckle up, buttercup - is that if the silly caption identifying the anti-doppelganger as a young Donald Trump had any veracity, CNN, ABC, MSNBC, AND See B.S. would be throwing it gleefully in our faces 24/7/365.

That photo is so manifestly NOT DJT that if a thousand people were axed in the blind to identify Cohen's capon, not one (1) person would suggest the Pride of Wharton. Not ONE, including you. 

But you were fed, and you will spew. 
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
maineman
15 Aug 2024 10:44 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
9,631 posts
EDC4ALL! » 15 Aug 2024, 10:23 am » wrote: She was NOT qualified. She Proved that by failing her assignment, and accomplishing NOTHING, while over 92% of her staff has bailed.
Cool opinion, eddie... I - and the President of the United States - happen to disagree with you. Image  
 
User avatar
Blackvegetable
15 Aug 2024 10:44 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
55,882 posts
maineman » 15 Aug 2024, 10:42 am » wrote: I think it is incredibly dishonest of you to suggest that recognizing the existence of transgender individuals and making some accommodations for them is tantamount to "removing every protection women have from the statistically undeniable propensity of men to commit sexual violence against them."  Talk about a **** DRAMA queen!

Tell me how letting a transgender person who identifies as a female use a women's restroom somehow magically removes the protection women have from being date raped by heterosexual acquaintances... somehow removes the protection women have from being sexually assaulted by their father or their brother?
SC is seeking redemption for the many occasions on which he undermined traditional marriage.

He should just adopt another cat..
 
User avatar
Blackvegetable
15 Aug 2024 10:46 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
55,882 posts
Cannonpointer » 15 Aug 2024, 10:44 am » wrote: My theory - and buckle up, buttercup - is that if the silly caption identifying the anti-doppelganger as a young Donald Trump had any veracity, CNN, ABC, MSNBC, AND See B.S. would be throwing it gleefully in our faces 24/7/365.

That photo is so manifestly NOT DJT that if a thousand people were axed in the blind to identify Cohen's capon, not one (1) person would suggest the Pride of Wharton. Not ONE, including you. 

But you were fed, and you will spew.
That's truly compelling logic.
 
User avatar
Cannonpointer
15 Aug 2024 10:46 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
45,616 posts
maineman » 15 Aug 2024, 10:42 am » wrote: I think it is incredibly dishonest of you to suggest that recognizing the existence of transgender individuals and making some accommodations for them is tantamount to "removing every protection women have from the statistically undeniable propensity of men to commit sexual violence against them."  Talk about a **** DRAMA queen!

Tell me how letting a transgender person who identifies as a female use a women's restroom
And she persists.

Where trannies tinkle is not the issue, fruity. 

Forcing women to accept them as cell mates and boxing opponents is a far cry from letting them tinkle in the next stall, committed fabricator. 
 
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
15 Aug 2024 10:47 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
45,616 posts
Blackvegetable » 15 Aug 2024, 10:46 am » wrote: That's truly compelling logic.
Thank you - but the fact part was the most interesting. The logic party was just the cherry on the sundae.
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
15 Aug 2024 10:48 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
45,616 posts
Blackvegetable » 15 Aug 2024, 10:42 am » wrote: You do no such thing, SC...

Your shame is indelible.
Now, now, Pride of Brown. 

Now, now. 
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
maineman
15 Aug 2024 10:52 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
9,631 posts
Cannonpointer » 15 Aug 2024, 10:46 am » wrote: And she persists.

Where trannies tinkle is not the issue, fruity. 

Forcing women to accept them as cell mates and boxing opponents is a far cry from letting them tinkle in the next stall, committed fabricator.

And typically, you dodged the tough question at the end, which only served to highlight the hysteria of your prior post.

You  certainly are  a cowardly cocksucker, that's for sure.
User avatar
FJB
15 Aug 2024 10:54 am
FJB
User avatar
      
8,191 posts
Cannonpointer » 15 Aug 2024, 10:11 am » wrote: Killing roe was the mechanism by which the issue was rightly returned to the states.
lol your opinion
User avatar
Cannonpointer
15 Aug 2024 10:55 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
45,616 posts
Not at all. 

It was Roe which kept the states from deciding. 

Repudiating Roe allowed the states to decide. 

Google it. 
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
15 Aug 2024 11:00 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
45,616 posts
maineman » 15 Aug 2024, 10:52 am » wrote: And typically, you dodged the tough question at the end, which only served to highlight the hysteria of your prior post.

You  certainly are  a cowardly cocksucker, that's for sure.
The question at the end was:

"Tell me how letting a transgender person who identifies as a female use a women's restroom"

I exposed the implicit lie. You repeated it. I exposed it again, and you repeated it again. 

Forcing women to share a prison cell with men cannot be reduced to "They just wanna tinkle in the next stall." No one buys it, moron. 

SB132 forces women to share prison cells with men IN CONTRAVENTION OF THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS AND INTERNATIONAL LAW.

The *** response? "Waaaah! Let Britney tinkle! Waaaah!"
 
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Blackvegetable
15 Aug 2024 11:01 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
55,882 posts
Cannonpointer » 15 Aug 2024, 10:47 am » wrote: Thank you - but the fact part was the most interesting. The logic party was just the cherry on the sundae.
What "fact part"?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
15 Aug 2024 11:02 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
45,616 posts
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

​​​​​​​https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
EDC4ALL!
15 Aug 2024 11:06 am
User avatar
   
1,098 posts
Blackvegetable » 15 Aug 2024, 10:38 am » wrote: What, exactly, is your theory here?

That a publication with a readership of 1.25 million, and a very deep pocketed owner, would appropriate the names of the archive and photographer, identify one of the subjects as the readily litigious Wee Donnie....and all affected parties just let it slide?

Is that it?

Then why oh why is there NOTHING to be found ANYWHERE that backs you up. This would be a huge scandal, but you and ONLY you seem to have an opinion on the picture. Hmmmmmmm...........
User avatar
Blackvegetable
15 Aug 2024 11:10 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
55,882 posts
You must have taken a closer look
​​​​​​​
User avatar
Cannonpointer
15 Aug 2024 11:11 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
45,616 posts
Blackvegetable » 15 Aug 2024, 11:10 am » wrote: You must have taken a closer look
 
That MUST be it, question boi.

Your intransigence on this issue is your high water, fruitcake. 

That photo resembles DJT in the same way that Kamala looks like the man she stole the nomination from, ya maroon.  :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:  
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
maineman
15 Aug 2024 11:19 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
9,631 posts
maineman » 15 Aug 2024, 10:42 am » wrote: I think it is incredibly dishonest of you to suggest that recognizing the existence of transgender individuals and making some accommodations for them is tantamount to "removing every protection women have from the statistically undeniable propensity of men to commit sexual violence against them."  Talk about a **** DRAMA queen!

Tell me how letting a transgender person who identifies as a female use a women's restroom somehow magically removes the protection women have from being date raped by heterosexual acquaintances... somehow removes the protection women have from being sexually assaulted by their father or their brother?
@Cannonpointer  
TRY AGAIN, COWARDLY COCKSUCKER.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
15 Aug 2024 11:20 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
45,616 posts
maineman » 15 Aug 2024, 10:52 am » wrote: And typically, you dodged the tough question at the end, which only served to highlight the hysteria of your prior post.

You  certainly are  a cowardly cocksucker, that's for sure.
"They just wanna TINKLE! WAAAAHHH!!!!"

In April 2023, Walz signed a law that turned Minnesota into a "transgender sanctuary state." House File 146 "prevents state courts or officials from complying with child removal requests, extraditions, arrests, or subpoenas related to gender-affirming health care that a person receives in Minnesota." This gave state courts the power to take kids away if parents don't sign off on so-called "gender-affirming" surgical procedures, allowing the state to have temporary emergency jurisdiction over the child.

"They just wanna TINKLE! WAAAAHHH!!!!"
 
For the record, fruitcake, laws that require the state to NOT HONOR the warrants and judgments of other states are unConstitutional on their face. Didn't stop democ rats. When it comes to butchering and assigning sexual agency to children, democ rats say **** the Constitution.
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
maineman
15 Aug 2024 11:22 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
9,631 posts
Cannonpointer » 15 Aug 2024, 11:20 am » wrote: "They just wanna TINKLE! WAAAAHHH!!!!"

In April 2023, Walz signed a law that turned Minnesota into a "transgender sanctuary state." House File 146 "prevents state courts or officials from complying with child removal requests, extraditions, arrests, or subpoenas related to gender-affirming health care that a person receives in Minnesota." This gave state courts the power to take kids away if parents don't sign off on so-called "gender-affirming" surgical procedures, allowing the state to have temporary emergency jurisdiction over the child.

"They just wanna TINKLE! WAAAAHHH!!!!"

STILL DODGING.


SAD.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
15 Aug 2024 11:23 am
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
45,616 posts
Your "question" (lie with a question mark) was utterly refuted. This is not about tinkling, Britney.
 
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
1 7 8 9 10 11 14

Who is online

In total there are 3605 users online :: 15 registered, 17 bots, and 3573 guests
Bots: facebookexternalhit, Yahoo! Slurp, Not, CriteoBot, proximic, Kinza, DuckDuckGo, LCC, DuckDuckBot, YandexBot, Mediapartners-Google, ADmantX, bingbot, Applebot, Googlebot, Baiduspider, curl/7
Updated 4 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search