Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 15 Aug 2024, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2024, 10:55 am

Not at all. 

It was Roe which kept the states from deciding. 

Repudiating Roe allowed the states to decide. 

Google it.

there is no total abortion ban

maineman » 15 Aug 2024, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2024, 11:19 am

Tell me how letting a transgender person who identifies as a female use a women's restroom somehow magically removes the protection women have from being date raped by heterosexual acquaintances... somehow removes the protection women have from being sexually assaulted by their father or their brother?

Tell us how forcing women to share prison cells and sporting events and showers with men even VAGUELY resembles merely allowing sexually confused men to tinkle in the next stall, Precious. 

Framing the issue of imprisoning women with male sex offenders and forcing women to compete in weight lifting and martial arts with men as a question of where trannies get to tinkle is so dishonest that I would have put it beyond even YOUR flight from dignity, Major Burns. 
 

FJB » 15 Aug 2024, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2024, 11:25 am

there is no total abortion ban

I never said there was - though I believe Texas comes pretty close, retardedly. 

In 15 years Texas is going to have a crime explosion the likes of which they will richly deserve. 
 

maineman » 15 Aug 2024, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2024, 10:42 am

Tell me how letting a transgender person who identifies as a female use a women's restroom somehow magically removes the protection women have from being date raped 

And that's another thing.

If it's a DATE, how can it be rape?

maineman » 14 Aug 2024, 6:41 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2024, 6:41 pm

1.  Yes...there were more qualified candidates for OCS.
2.   Yes... I would want the best surgeon available to operate on my granddaughter
3.  Joe found a fully qualified black woman.  Good choice.  
4.  I don't find the term insulting unless the implication is that she was chosen solely for her gender and skin color and was not otherwise as equally qualified as the tall blond Aryan quarterbacks.  She checked all the boxes.... including skill set, political acumen, and chemistry.  
5. I get hangry when anyone routinely uses the N-word to describe fellow Americans.  From my perspective, that is not hypocritical... it is patriotic.

Is nappy head the n word you are referring to?

maineman » 15 Aug 2024, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2024, 10:42 am

I think it is incredibly dishonest of you to suggest that recognizing the existence of transgender individuals and making some accommodations for them is tantamount to "removing every protection women have from the statistically undeniable propensity of men to commit sexual violence against them."  Talk about a **** DRAMA queen!

Tell me how letting a transgender person who identifies as a female use a women's restroom somehow magically removes the protection women have from being date raped by heterosexual acquaintances... somehow removes the protection women have from being sexually assaulted by their father or their brother?

WTF are you talking about?

maineman » 14 Aug 2024, 6:41 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Aug 2024, 6:41 pm

5. I get hangry when anyone routinely uses the N-word to describe fellow Americans.  

You must **** yourself when black comics take the stage or when you hear rap or hip hop.

Sorry to hear how reactivated you are by of-coloreds - you should get some therapy. 

It's a diverse world, fruitcake - you gotta get along with all kinds - even of-coloreds. 
 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 15 Aug 2024, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2024, 11:23 am

Your "question" (lie with a question mark) was utterly refuted. This is not about tinkling, Britney.

I am done trying to continue this conversation with the tarbaby.  TTFN

maineman » 15 Aug 2024, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2024, 11:43 am

I am done trying to continue this conversation with the tarbaby.  TTFN

Yeah, we see that, Major Burns. 

I stubbornly refuse to equate the imprisoning of women and men in the same cell (in violation of international law) with the "don't we have a right to tinkle?" strawman.

You run along and hide, now - deal with your blisters.
 
 

EDC4ALL! » 15 Aug 2024, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2024, 11:06 am

Then why oh why is there NOTHING to be found ANYWHERE that backs you up. This would be a huge scandal, but you and ONLY you seem to have an opinion on the picture. Hmmmmmmm...........

Just post the rule, Ed..


 

Somehow... acknowledging transgender citizens and making some accommodations for them is tantamount to removing every protection women have from the statistically undeniable propensity of men to commit sexual violence against them, and somehow incentivizes all men - fathers, brothers, spouses, co-workers, strangers - to see those accommodations as removing any barrier from THEM committing sexual violence against women. Those accommodations somehow remove EVERY protection women have. They somehow make MACE ineffective. They somehow disable every woman's ability to knee bad guys in the balls, and they somehow render helpless any man who might be in the vicinity of sexual violence against a woman, preventing them from coming to their aid. Yes... EVERY PROTECTION WOMEN HAVE FROM SEXUAL VIOLENCE HAS BEEN REMOVED.

Cannonpointer » 15 Aug 2024, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2024, 11:29 am

I never said there was - though I believe Texas comes pretty close, retardedly. 

In 15 years Texas is going to have a crime explosion the likes of which they will richly deserve.

Because if illegals yes

FJB » 15 Aug 2024, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2024, 12:54 pm

Because if illegals yes

No, no, no. That is an injury being done them.

I am referring to them shooting THEMSELVES in the ***.

By outlawing abortion, they make it where anyone with any intelligence has to take a car, bus, or plane trip and get a motel in order to have an abortion. And who does THIS leave behind?

Ghetto trash. The only group being forced to bear live young is ghetto trash - she-boons who lack the funds and/or the life skills to manage the logistics of an abortion.

And in 15 years, those she-boons' blighted progeny will enter its wilding years, and the same stupid cocksuckers who made these laws will be in their golden years, trying to avoid the street muggings and home invasions their retardedness foisted on that once peaceful state. 
 

Cannonpointer » 15 Aug 2024, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2024, 1:00 pm

No, no, no. That is an injury being done them.

I am referring to them shooting THEMSELVES in the ***.

By outlawing abortion, they make it where anyone with any intelligence has to take a car, bus, or plane trip and get a motel in order to have an abortion. And who does THIS leave behind?

Ghetto trash. The only group being forced to bear live young is ghetto trash - she-boons who lack the funds and/or the life skills to manage the logistics of an abortion.

And in 15 years, those she-boons' blighted progeny will enter its wilding years, and the same stupid cocksuckers who made these laws will be in their golden years, trying to avoid the street muggings and home invasions their retardedness foisted on that once peaceful state.

Abortion is murder in mist cases. Maybe these ghetto trash need to keep there legs closed or get sterilized.  

maineman » 15 Aug 2024, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2024, 12:31 pm

Somehow... acknowledging transgender citizens and making some accommodations for them is tantamount to removing every protection women have from the statistically undeniable propensity of men to commit sexual violence against them, and somehow incentivizes all men - fathers, brothers, spouses, co-workers, strangers - to see those accommodations as removing any barrier from THEM committing sexual violence against women.

Putting women into prison cells with male sex offenders - on the word of those male sex offenders that they are now "women" - cannot be soft-soaped away with clintonesque lawyering, fruitcake. 

They are not putting women into prison cells with "fathers, brothers, spouses, co-workers." They are putting them into prison cells with male sex offenders.

Female athletes are not being forced to compete with "fathers, brothers, spouses, co-workers." They are being forced to compete with male athletes.

Your misogyny is equaled only by your dishonesty and hypocrisy. 

maineman » 15 Aug 2024, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2024, 12:31 pm

Those accommodations somehow remove EVERY protection women have.

Oh, they can still buy a gun, fruitcake. You've merely stripped them of the LEGAL protections they enjoyed before your misogyny.

maineman » 15 Aug 2024, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2024, 12:31 pm

They somehow make MACE ineffective. They somehow disable every woman's ability to knee bad guys in the balls, and they somehow render helpless any man who might be in the vicinity of sexual violence against a woman, preventing them from coming to their aid. Yes... EVERY PROTECTION WOMEN HAVE FROM SEXUAL VIOLENCE HAS BEEN REMOVED.

THERE'S the little girl!

Put the onus on a woman of dealing with the creeps you have let invade her shower, her prison cell. DO THEY ALLOW FEMALE PRISONERS TO CARRY MACE, you weak chinned ****? Do women shower with mace? Should they be forced to, misogynist?
 

FJB » 15 Aug 2024, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2024, 1:02 pm

Abortion is murder in mist cases. Maybe these ghetto trash need to keep there legs closed or get sterilized.

And MAYBE apple trees should bear mango fruits.

If you live in Texas, I suggest you plan to get the **** out of that jungle in the next decade or so. If not, you will be paying a price. 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Aug 2024, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2024, 12:10 pm

Just post the rule, Ed..

NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
 

Cannonpointer » 15 Aug 2024, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2024, 10:24 am

I honestly think you are incredibly dishonest to reduce the removal of every protection women have from the statistically undeniable propensity of men to commit sexual violence against them down to "trannies just wanna tinkle."

In your words...  How does making accommodations for transgendered citizens cause the removal of EVERY protection women have from the propensity of men to commit sexual violence against them?  What does a transgendered citizen in some restroom or some high school gymnasium or even some prison cell have to do with other heterosexual men committing sexual violence against women anywhere else in the country?
 
 
 

maineman » 15 Aug 2024, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2024, 1:14 pm

In your words,  How does making accommodations for transgendered citizens cause the removal of EVERY protection women have from the propensity of men to commit sexual violence against them?

Every legal protection, misogynist.

It does this by allowing men into previously sex-segregated spaces.

maineman » 15 Aug 2024, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2024, 1:14 pm

 What does a transgendered citizen in some restroom or some high school gymnasium or even some prison cell have to do with other heterosexual men committing sexual violence against women anywhere else in the country?

Define transgendered or stop talking about it.

So long as "transgendered" rests on a subjective claim, it is a meaningless term. Believe it or not, some male sexual predators will tell a fib to get access to fresh victims.

Putting men in prison cells with women is against the Geneva Conventions and other treaties to which we are signatory and is considered a crime against humanity under the laws of the Hague, which we helped to draft.

maineman » 15 Aug 2024, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2024, 10:42 am

I think it is incredibly dishonest of you to suggest that recognizing the existence of transgender individuals and making some accommodations for them is tantamount to "removing every protection women have from the statistically undeniable propensity of men to commit sexual violence against them."  Talk about a **** DRAMA queen!

Tell me how letting a transgender person who identifies as a female use a women's restroom somehow magically removes the protection women have from being date raped by heterosexual acquaintances... somehow removes the protection women have from being sexually assaulted by their father or their brother?

Wait...in order to look at statistics involving men versus women...don't you have to accept that there is in fact a difference between men and women?