Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Why is Calling Kamala a DEI Hire Bad?
Why is Calling Kamala a DEI Hire Bad?
By Cannonpointer
13 Aug 2024 9:28 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
14 Aug 2024 1:14 pm
Cannonpointer » 14 Aug 2024, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑And look at the panty dancer fleeing them! :die: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2024, 5:59 am » wrote: ↑ Look at this Syphilitic Cumbucket asking questions...
Cannonpointer » 13 Aug 2024, 5:48 pm » wrote: ↑NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
Cannonpointer » 13 Aug 2024, 5:47 pm » wrote: ↑NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
Syphilitic Cumbucket.Cannonpointer » 13 Aug 2024, 5:46 pm » wrote: ↑NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!Blackvegetable » 13 Aug 2024, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑ Have you ever voted for a POTUS who bequeathed a smaller deficit than what he inherited?
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
14 Aug 2024 1:16 pm
she's running against 2X "worse than Buchanan"EDC4ALL! » 14 Aug 2024, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑ she has NO qualifications. ZIP..ZERO. Get it? Being a DEI hire as VP and then she does NOTHING for 3.5 years because she is unqualified to do ANYTHING.
Her handlers (same ones that **** canned Joe) won't even let her speak because she will PROVE how unqualified she is. Why do you support someone that is so afraid of the public? How bad can she be when she has this kind of record????
https://abc3340.com/news/nation-world/v ... il-2023-to
https://mynbc15.com/news/nation-world/v ... ng-of-term
https://www.openthebooks.com/substack-v ... ree-years/
https://www.quora.com/Why-did-90-of-Kam ... -President
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kamala ... -resurface
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/20 ... -staff-ci/
In other words, she's a know it all **** bitch. Yeah, I'm sure world leaders are really gonna respect the cackling ****!
14 Aug 2024 1:30 pm
You do mean Pat Buchanan chronic GOP liar propagandist right?
He's so bad he couldn't even beat Dubya Bush!
https://youtu.be/qBm7SZ_WjYY
@Blackvegetable
14 Aug 2024 1:37 pm
No...James Buchanan..Beakman » 14 Aug 2024, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑ You do mean Pat Buchanan chronic GOP liar propagandist right?
He's so bad he couldn't even beat Dubya Bush!
https://youtu.be/qBm7SZ_WjYY
@Blackvegetable
Previously the worst POTUS evah.
14 Aug 2024 1:44 pm
GODDDAMIT! You threw me a curve ball!Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2024, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑ No...James Buchanan..
Previously the worst POTUS evah.
How can J.B. matter? he was so long ago?
@Blackvegetable
14 Aug 2024 1:54 pm
Duhhhhh
14 Aug 2024 2:05 pm
Cannonpointer » 13 Aug 2024, 9:28 pm » wrote: ↑ If dems BELIEVE in DEI, why are they insulted by the term?
There's nothing WRONG with DEI, is there? Why not be PROUD of your DEI hire?
@maineman @Blackvegetable
DEI is an excellent way to constantly examine your hiring practices. I can remember back in the 1980s, after the winddown from the Vietnam War. I spoke to a Navy recruiter on behalf of a young enlisted man who had gotten a bachelor's degree and wanted to attend OCS. The problem was that his grades in college were just passing. The recruiter told me he had so few OCS slots available that he could work half days and fill every slot with tall, blond varsity football players with 4.0 GPAs.
That is the same dilemma that modern employers have. There are so many qualified applicants for every position that every one of those employers could very easily fill all of their open positions with only white Anglo-Saxon men..... BUT WHY WOULD THEY? If there are equally qualified candidates - some women, some people of color, some gay or lesbian, why NOT diversify and include some of those other folks so that your workforce and your management team look like a cross-section of America instead of the Aryan Brotherhood?
The qualifications for Vice President and President are pretty **** subjective beyond the three in the constitution. We have had ALL SORTS of different backgrounds, educational levels, and skill sets. Some less-educated guys did a bang-up job, and some brainiacs with uber-fancy resumes didn't.
If you are the presidential nominee, why NOT go find a fully qualified VP candidate who is NOT your same gender, your same ethnicity, or even your same sexual orientation? If the personal chemistry between the two of them is positive. If the presidential candidate believes that his (or her) VP choice shares values, will have their backs, and would be capable of stepping in and finishing the term, who are WE to denigrate that decision?
14 Aug 2024 2:15 pm
Harris sucked off Barry to get the nod......Mike stood around like a nice cuck should........
14 Aug 2024 2:20 pm
DeezerShoove » 14 Aug 2024, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑ "to do an adequate job" that may work as a bouncer at The Apollo Theater.
The skin color does little to guide a scalpel properly into my flesh.
it isn't about whether they can do the job. It is about whether white people get money for anything. And in this country, they should not.
14 Aug 2024 2:30 pm
Why do fudge packing Queers who throw PRIDE PARADES for themselves act so angry and hurt when they are called disease ridden Sodomites...?Cannonpointer » 13 Aug 2024, 9:28 pm » wrote: ↑ If dems BELIEVE in DEI, why are they insulted by the term?
There's nothing WRONG with DEI, is there? Why not be PROUD of your DEI hire?
@maineman @Blackvegetable
14 Aug 2024 2:44 pm
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
14 Aug 2024 2:57 pm
So there were more qualified candidates, is what you are telling me.maineman » 14 Aug 2024, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑ DEI is an excellent way to constantly examine your hiring practices. I can remember back in the 1980s, after the winddown from the Vietnam War. I spoke to a Navy recruiter on behalf of a young enlisted man who had gotten a bachelor's degree and wanted to attend OCS. The problem was that his grades in college were just passing. The recruiter told me he had so few OCS slots available that he could work half days and fill every slot with tall, blond varsity football players with 4.0 GPAs.
Would you want the most qualified candidate to operate on your grandchild, or would you want a DEI candidate to operate on your grandchild?
That's not a rhetorical question - though the obviousness of the correct answer might make it appear so.
I would like your candid response.
The biggest word in that claptrap is "IF."maineman » 14 Aug 2024, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑ That is the same dilemma that modern employers have. There are so many qualified applicants for every position that every one of those employers could very easily fill all of their open positions with only white Anglo-Saxon men..... BUT WHY WOULD THEY? If there are equally qualified candidates - some women, some people of color, some gay or lesbian, why NOT diversify and include some of those other folks so that your workforce and your management team look like a cross-section of America instead of the Aryan Brotherhood?
Joe said upfront that he would select a female of color as his VP. So your aggression toward Aryans can take a seat in the matter of Kamala being a DEI hire. She simply is one - full stop. The candidate SAID SO, before he picked her. He promised AND delivered a DEI hire.
Right. And she is a DEI hire. The question of the OP is, why is that term insulting to the people who defend it? WHY NOT EMBRACE IT? Why try to wordsmith out of it?maineman » 14 Aug 2024, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑ The qualifications for Vice President and President are pretty **** subjective beyond the three in the constitution. We have had ALL SORTS of different backgrounds, educational levels, and skill sets. Some less-educated guys did a bang-up job, and some brainiacs with uber-fancy resumes didn't.
That's my whole point - How is it "denigrating" to call her a DEI hire?maineman » 14 Aug 2024, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑ If you are the presidential nominee, why NOT go find a fully qualified VP candidate who is NOT your same gender, your same ethnicity, or even your same sexual orientation? If the personal chemistry between the two of them is positive. If the presidential candidate believes that his (or her) VP choice shares values, will have their backs, and would be capable of stepping in and finishing the term, who are WE to denigrate that decision?
Please - explain how acknowledging the historical fact that she was selected, fully qualified, for her race and gender is "denigrating."
You BELIEVE in it, but you get hangry when we talk about it. That seems hypocritical.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
14 Aug 2024 3:04 pm
JD sucked off Peter Theil..EDC4ALL! » 54 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Harris sucked off Barry to get the nod......Mike stood around like a nice cuck should........
And then there's
14 Aug 2024 3:09 pm
Exactly.maineman » 14 Aug 2024, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑ DEI is an excellent way to constantly examine your hiring practices. I can remember back in the 1980s, after the winddown from the Vietnam War. I spoke to a Navy recruiter on behalf of a young enlisted man who had gotten a bachelor's degree and wanted to attend OCS. The problem was that his grades in college were just passing. The recruiter told me he had so few OCS slots available that he could work half days and fill every slot with tall, blond varsity football players with 4.0 GPAs.
That is the same dilemma that modern employers have. There are so many qualified applicants for every position that every one of those employers could very easily fill all of their open positions with only white Anglo-Saxon men..... BUT WHY WOULD THEY? If there are equally qualified candidates - some women, some people of color, some gay or lesbian, why NOT diversify and include some of those other folks so that your workforce and your management team look like a cross-section of America instead of the Aryan Brotherhood?
The qualifications for Vice President and President are pretty **** subjective beyond the three in the constitution. We have had ALL SORTS of different backgrounds, educational levels, and skill sets. Some less-educated guys did a bang-up job, and some brainiacs with uber-fancy resumes didn't.
If you are the presidential nominee, why NOT go find a fully qualified VP candidate who is NOT your same gender, your same ethnicity, or even your same sexual orientation? If the personal chemistry between the two of them is positive. If the presidential candidate believes that his (or her) VP choice shares values, will have their backs, and would be capable of stepping in and finishing the term, who are WE to denigrate that decision?
It's been practice for VP selection forever...you pick someone who adds a constituency you want.
14 Aug 2024 3:10 pm
Prostituting yourself and showering with your teenage daughter aren't exactly called values, Wilford.maineman » 14 Aug 2024, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑
If you are the presidential nominee, why NOT go find a fully qualified VP candidate who is NOT your same gender, your same ethnicity, or even your same sexual orientation? If the personal chemistry between the two of them is positive. If the presidential candidate believes that his (or her) VP choice shares values, will have their backs, and would be capable of stepping in and finishing the term, who are WE to denigrate that decision?
14 Aug 2024 3:12 pm
And lest I step over this important question, let me address it on its ownmaineman » 14 Aug 2024, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑
That is the same dilemma that modern employers have. There are so many qualified applicants for every position that every one of those employers could very easily fill all of their open positions with only white Anglo-Saxon men..... BUT WHY WOULD THEY? If there are equally qualified candidates - some women, some people of color, some gay or lesbian, why NOT diversify and include some of those other folks so that your workforce and your management team look like a cross-section of America instead of the Aryan Brotherhood?
Leaving aside the preposterous fiction that blacks and lesbians produce equal numbers of qualified job candidates (lesbian relationships result in domestic violence even more often then than black ones do, which indicates poor impulse control and low maturity), there is another argument for a homogeneous work space. I know it is quite tony to yap about the "power" of diversity, and it MIGHT have worked out in the military, back in the pre-pronoun days, because of the top heaviness of military life. But in truth, HR departments in the civilian world go through nightmares dealing with all the hurt feelings and special cases attending the forced "diversification" of work places.
I am a big believer in nepotism - and every successful company I have been a part of has tapped its current employees to find its future ones. The operative theory is that if you ask your best people to invite their friends to apply, you are likely to get similar people. If you give me a choice between two candidates - one a ten, and one a 7 on paper, and the seven is the kid of a fellow already working on the line, here is what I know: The 10 is going to be greeted with caution and the 7 is going to be greeted hale fellow well met. "You're Bob's kid? Oh, I hope you work better than THAT slack ***" - and such. And the fact is, individuals do not create profits. TEAMS do. And when you build as much potential for conflict as possible into a team, you're going to get **** conflict.
Now, I certainly take umbrage at the dishonest tactic of using a criminal prison gang to describe a perfectly dignified and civilized group of white people, you pig. I don't want to step over THAT bit of sleaze, either. It's absolute **** for you to characterize a white work force as a prison gang.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
14 Aug 2024 3:12 pm
Remember when you got your *** handed to you because you couldn't prove that was Trump? It was AWESOME!!!!!!!
14 Aug 2024 3:12 pm
She brought California - I will grant you that, fruitcake.Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2024, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Exactly.
It's been practice for VP selection forever...you pick someone who adds a constituency you want.
Good thing, too. The democrats really needed California - she was a yuge boon to the ticket.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
14 Aug 2024 3:15 pm
You're a **** idiot..Cannonpointer » 14 Aug 2024, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑ She brought California - I will grant you that, fruitcake.
Good thing, too. The democrats really needed California - she was a yuge boon to the ticket.
.
14 Aug 2024 3:48 pm
Cannonpointer » 14 Aug 2024, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑ And lest I step over this important question, let me address it on its own
Leaving aside the preposterous fiction that blacks and lesbians produce equal numbers of qualified job candidates (lesbian relationships result in domestic violence even more often then than black ones do, which indicates poor impulse control and low maturity), there is another argument for a homogeneous work space. I know it is quite tony to yap about the "power" of diversity, and it MIGHT have worked out in the military, back in the pre-pronoun days, because of the top heaviness of military life. But in truth, HR departments in the civilian world go through nightmares dealing with all the hurt feelings and special cases attending the forced "diversification" of work places.
I am a big believer in nepotism - and every successful company I have been a part of has tapped its current employees to find its future ones. The operative theory is that if you ask your best people to invite their friends to apply, you are likely to get similar people. If you give me a choice between two candidates - one a ten, and one a 7 on paper, and the seven is the kid of a fellow already working on the line, here is what I know: The 10 is going to be greeted with caution and the 7 is going to be greeted hale fellow well met. "You're Bob's kid? Oh, I hope you work better than THAT slack ***" - and such. And the fact is, individuals do not create profits. TEAMS do. And when you build as much potential for conflict as possible into a team, you're going to get **** conflict.
Now, I certainly take umbrage at the dishonest tactic of using a criminal prison gang to describe a perfectly dignified and civilized group of white people, you pig. I don't want to step over THAT bit of sleaze, either. It's absolute **** for you to characterize a white work force as a prison gang.
And I never said that blacks or lesbians produced equal numbers of anything. I merely said that when an HR manager comes upon a black woman candidate for a middle management position... and she's got great qualifications and a great resume, if he looked at his management team and they were all blond. All white. All tall. All heterosexual. All.... alike. And then he looked at his workforce, and they were much more ethnically diverse; MAYBE, just MAYBE, hiring her INSTEAD of yet another equally qualified tall white blond guy MIGHT be a reasonable thing to consider. Kinda like Joe did when he chose Kamala.
And I understand that Aryan Brotherhood was perhaps a poorly chosen example. Would "Hitler Youth" work better for you?
Who is online
In total there are 3904 users online :: 17 registered, 16 bots, and 3871 guests
Registered users: Vegas, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Zeets2, Buck Naked, Squatchman, Buffalo, RebelGator, FJB, MR-7, Beekeeper, LowIQTrash, PhiloBeddo, SouthernFried, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, Fuelman
Bots: DuckDuckBot, Yahoo! Slurp, Firefox/7.0, DuckDuckGo, ADmantX, CriteoBot, Kinza, Mediapartners-Google, facebookexternalhit, proximic, YandexBot, bingbot, Baiduspider, Applebot, curl/7, Googlebot