If you had a case, you wouldn't need so many references to cock.Beekeeper » 14 Aug 2024, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑ No, I followed the TRIAL TRANSCRIPT and now I can DECLARE ABSOLUTELY TOTAL SURRENDER FROM YOU AND VICTORY TABOOT!!
Please, take your CURB STOMPED *** and find a new playground since NO ONE HERE thinks you are anything but a **** ASSHOLE THAT LOVES TO SUCK COCK!!
Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2024, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/ch ... e-v.-trump
The Potential Object Offenses: Federal Election Law
Merchan held that Bragg may not point to Cohen’s guilty plea or the Justice Department or FEC agreements with AMI as themselves evidence of Trump’s guilt, but that the district attorney may offer “testimony about the underlying facts … provided the proper foundation is laid.”
No, Thicker than ****....read the citation.*Huey » 14 Aug 2024, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑ Not my problem. Depending on what the appeals court decides it is either Bragg's or Merchan's. I am tired of hearing "underlying crime" that no one can name or specify.
Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2024, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑ If you had a case, you wouldn't need so many references to cock.
The *** da bragg based the step ups on an unConstitutional New Jerk state law, ***!!! The sham case will be overturned on appeal.Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2024, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑ There were 3 step ups, one of them federal.
This has been explained to you, with citations, repeatedly.
Your impervious ignorance is of your own insistence.
Buffy,Buffalo » 14 Aug 2024, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑ The *** da bragg based the step ups on an unConstitutional New Jerk state law, ***!!! The sham case will be overturned on appeal.
The da was prejudiced against Trump, the judge was prejudiced against Trump and the Jury was rigged and given instructions by the prejudiced judge that made it almost impossible for them to not find Trump guilty of the phony ****. All designed as part of a braindead by-done and his dim-0-crap doj apparats to keep Trump from running for POTUS in 2024.
YOU are the impervious ignorant one, ***!!!
Awful big talk behind a keyboard. Go **** yourself, ***
OMG! World Nut Daily!!!! hahahhahahhahahhahahhaBuffalo » 14 Aug 2024, 6:55 am » wrote: ↑ Alvin Bragg gets sued for concealing records of his case against President Trump
Freedom of Information request demanded answers about whether charges were 'partisan prosecution'
By Bob Unruh
August 13, 2024
Alvin Bragg, the Manhattan prosecutor who took years-old misdemeanor business records charges for which the statute of limitations had expired, and made them felonies against President Donald Trump because he claimed they were done in furtherance of some other unspecified crime, now is facing a lawsuit for his actions.
It is America First Legal that has sued Bragg for refusing to turn over records of how he developed his case, whether he consulted with the Joe Biden administration in the case, and whether it was a "partisan prosecution" against the GOP presidential nominee.
At the time Trump was opposing Joe Biden in the 2024 presidential race. Since then, the elites of the Democrat party essentially tossed Biden under the bus and named Kamala Harris as his replacement.
The Washington Examiner notes the lawsuit came about because Bragg repeatedly refused to provide documentation about the case. Bragg's office now is accused of withholding, illegally, records in his case.
Daniel Epstein, an AFL vice president, said there shouldn't be anything hidden.
"If improper ex parte communications influenced what is supposed to be nonpartisan prosecutorial conduct, all Americans are at risk," he said.AFL has been investigating Bragg's case for months, and has focused on the communications inside and outside the D.A.'s office.
"The group's requests also sought records of interactions with high-profile figures such as Lanny Davis, a Democratic consultant and attorney for ex-Trump lawyer Michael Cohen, who claimed credit for sparking the district attorney's investigation into Trump during an interview with Politico in March of last year," the report said.
The circumstances that Bragg used to develop the case had been rejected by other prosecutors as sufficient for charges. In fact, Bragg had made the same decision earlier, then under pressure to get Trump changed his mind.
Based on the testimony of a convicted perjurer, a jury in leftist Manhattan convicted Trump on 34 counts involving business records.
The case also has been left unsettled because of the Supreme Court's ruling that presidents have immunity from charges for many of the acts they take in office. It hasn't been determined how that ruling affects Bragg's claims.
Full article:
Alvin Bragg gets sued for concealing records of his case against President Trump * WorldNetDaily * by Bob Unruh (wnd.com)
Deny proof of the suit against *** bragg or shut the **** up, ****!!!
Dont talk about CNN like that
brown, that's all you got, a typo?
That wasn't a typo, CC..
Typing "COCKSUCKER" is not stomping squat.Beekeeper » 14 Aug 2024, 4:20 pm » wrote: ↑ AND this is what a **** SAYS after the CURB STOMPING SHE GETS!!
Run along, DICKBREATH, your starting to stink up the forum. Again.
https://i.postimg.cc/br66z6Fn/****.jpg
Blackvegetable » 14 Aug 2024, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Typing "COCKSUCKER" is not stomping squat.
inbred yokel.
Not because you use caps and exclamation points.Beekeeper » 14 Aug 2024, 5:50 pm » wrote: ↑ You need a gauze pad?? And some tape??
YOU got your *** CURB STOMPED MASSIVELY ON MULTIPLE THREADS, DICKSUCKER!! Now go whine to your boyfriend and maybe he will fill up your *** WITH HIS JIZZ!!