Liberal Forum

MR-7 » 25 Jun 2025, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2025, 9:47 am

Look at that...the crew chief right there at the door. Much RESPECT.
Bing Videos
 

 

Thanks.  According to BV I was just a stewardess.  

MR-7 » 25 Jun 2025, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2025, 9:49 am

To a liberal it is. Hegseth has stopped it though.

I wish.

It is still perfecty legal for a US service"man" to have a chubby hubby like tampon timmy.
 
Hell, we even had one president that was married to a *** man.
 
 

MR-7 » 25 Jun 2025, 8:38 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2025, 8:38 am

Well, what R U saying in regard to Timmy and JD?

That is a direct question.

You just put a quarter in the panty dance machine. 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 25 Jun 2025, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2025, 9:55 am

I wish.

It is still perfecty legal for a US service"man" to have a chubby hubby like tampon timmy.
 
Hell, we even had one president that was married to a *** man.

Well, some things take a while to "re-program". 
 

*Huey » 25 Jun 2025, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2025, 9:18 am

And he is not a retired Command Sergeant Major.  He did not complete the required course work nor did fulfill the enlistment requirements.

Tampon Timmy is a stolen valor queer. Or, "hero," in beevee's world...
 

MR-7 » 25 Jun 2025, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2025, 9:31 am

I attended the Sergeants Major Academy, "Class 74" (Fort Bliss in El Paso, Texas), in 2003. It's a 42-week course. You cannot 'Retire" as a Sergeants Major without having attended the course. Also, you must wear the rank for two years to retire at that rank.

Spank you for your swervice. 
 

*Huey » 25 Jun 2025, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2025, 9:50 am

Thanks.  According to BV I was just a stewardess.

     

That's alright.

In beevee's world, being a stewardess means you've got an enormous cock.   
 
 

MR-7 » 25 Jun 2025, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2025, 10:06 am

Well, some things take a while to "re-program".

Things like this require an act of congress to reprogram.

Hate to tell ya, but I don't think the repukes are a vessel you can put your hopes in. 

They're mostly secret *** and bathroomers. Think, Lindsey Graham and Teddy Cruz.
 
 

Cannonpointer » 25 Jun 2025, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2025, 7:56 am

Just out of curiosity, was this ^ a "curb stomping"?

Asking for a fiend.

Where is your abject apology?

Cannonpointer » 25 Jun 2025, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2025, 10:23 am

Spank you for your swervice.

Thank you. It was a pleasure. No one made me do it. I TRULY felt a "sense of gratification" while serving.   
 

Cannonpointer » 25 Jun 2025, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2025, 10:25 am

     

That's alright.

In beevee's world, being a stewardess means you've got an enormous cock.   
 
 

 

 
 

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2025, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2025, 10:28 am

Where is your abject apology?

Honest understanding of how one became an instinctive lifetime personally aware of their sole time alive proportionately here has, an abject opinion from their unique brain from the traditional social minds everywhere people prefer believing anything else is possible than their specific time alive now.

History records people ignoring why they are self evident factually justifying their behaviors each generation gap added in good faith they create better 7 days a week than being alive actually living eternally separated by the moment here inhabiting space one at a time now.

You're of that intellectual choice with being a type of character blaming every other ideology but your own for never accepting life for all it ever was since you arrived a specific fertilized cell in specific ancestral lineage, generation gap regardless siblings and cousins, everyone else's ancestral lineage at the same time you been alive after birth.

Gee hypocrisy defines a specific nature of people working all alternate realities to accomplish the same outcome every generation living daily here regardless ancestral lineage or generation gaps combined.

Role playing on a world stage of events people keep promising better tomorrows 7 days a week and life never exceeded adapting in the moment here.

when did humanity go wrong? Dawn of current civilized New World Order historically falls back to about 7,000 years ago..

Timmy spent more time in China, than in military uniform for his entire 26 years' service.

MR-7 » 25 Jun 2025, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2025, 11:26 am

Timmy spent more time in China, than in military uniform for his entire 26 years' service.

Let's see.....one weekend a month, and 2 weeks "annual training' = 38 days a year x 26 = 998 days...divided by 30 = 33...33 months....Timmy was in uniform less than 3 years for his entire 26-year career.   
 

MR-7 » 25 Jun 2025, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2025, 11:46 am

Let's see.....one weekend a month, and 2 weeks "annual training' = 38 days a year x 26 = 998 days...divided by 30 = 33...33 months....Timmy was in uniform less than 3 years for his entire 26-year career. 

So, Timmy spent 26 years in service and was in uniform less than JD who served 4 years. 
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Aug 2024, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Aug 2024, 12:30 pm

These people are so **** stupid...

https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/15/politics ... index.html

Trump has publicly rejected Project 2025 as Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign has sought to tie him to some of the plan’s most extreme proposals. But in private, Vought said that those disavowals were merely “graduate-level politics.”

Vought said his group, the Center for Renewing America, was secretly drafting hundreds of executive orders, regulations, and memos that would lay the groundwork for rapid action on Trump’s plans if he wins, describing his work as creating “shadow” agencies. He claimed that Trump has “blessed” his organization and “he’s very supportive of what we do.”

The thing working in America's favor is the twice divorced, louche Grifty's habit of refusing to pay invoices when presented.

You might call it the Marriage of Heaven and Hell.

​​​​

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Vegas » 25 Jun 2025, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2025, 12:32 pm

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

or

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

You did it again. As always, you refuse to answer questions while demanding yours gets answered.  

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2025, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2025, 12:36 pm

You did it again. As always, you refuse to answer questions while demanding yours gets answered.  

    God the hypocrisy never ends.
1. You will copy/paste that also ^^^


Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Vegas » 25 Jun 2025, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2025, 12:37 pm

    God the hypocrisy never ends.
1. You will copy/paste that also ^^^

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

or

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

You did it again. As always, you refuse to answer questions while demanding yours gets answered.  
 

Don't run

@Blackvegetable  "Have you ever "marked time"?

Posted at 10:45 this morning