Liberal Forum

You REALLY can't make this **** up folks. When you LOSE THE WASHINGTON COMPOST, YOU LOST THE ELECTION!!!

Even THEY know that what you LWNJ's have is a VAPID, INCOHERENT, AND DESPERATE CANDIDATE that has NOTHING but COMMUNIST IDEOLOGY that is an ABJECT FAILURE waiting to be kicked to the curb.


Vice President Kamala Harris’ plan to avoid the media because her team laughably thinks that no one pays attention to significant networks or prominent newspapers isn’t going to last. Yes, media is an ever-changing landscape, but solely focusing on TikTok and social media is a surefire way to lose an election. People need to hear ideas and policies that will help them, and Kamala hasn’t offered much. What she has provided is a throwback to Soviet Russia.

 It’s a window into why her team keeps her from press conferences. The latest pitch to curb inflation is to stomp out price-gouging, which is such pie-in-the-sky nonsense that it almost makes you wonder if Harris qualifies for this office. She’s not—you know that, but that’s not the point: what the hell is this campaign other than showing that Democrats have a black woman running after wresting the nomination from Joe Biden? Catherine Rampell trashed Harris, and now the editorial board writ large is body-slamming her, calling her candidacy gimmicky: 

 Americans are clearly still anxious and angry about the high cost of groceries, housing and even $5.29 Big Macs. While the inflation rate has cooled substantially since the 2022 peak, an ostensible Biden-Harris administration accomplishment, prices remain elevated relative to the Trump years. So it’s a real political issue for Ms. Harris. One way to handle it might be to level with voters, telling them that inflation spiked in 2021 mainly because the pandemic snarled supply chains, and that the Federal Reserve’s policies, which the Biden-Harris administration supported, are working to slow it. The vice president instead opted for a less forthright route: Blaming big business. She vowed to go after “price gouging” by grocery stores, landlords, pharmaceutical companies and other supposed corporate perpetrators by having the Federal Trade Commission enforce a vaguely defined “federal ban on price gouging.” 

 Never mind that many stores are currently slashing prices in response to renewed consumer bargain hunting. Ms. Harris says she’ll target companies that make “excessive” profits, whatever that means… 

 […] 
 Her ideas would cost money, yet she insisted in her speech that she would hold to President Joe Biden’s pledge not to raise taxes on any household earning $400,000 or less annually. That excludes 80 percent of taxable income, and does not take into account the recent surge in families earning over $400,000. The Harris campaign says it plans to raise revenue to cover these costs but did not provide specific offsets in its economic plan rollout. Without them, Ms. Harris’s full plan would add $1.7 trillion to federal deficits over a decade, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a nonpartisan budget watchdog. 

 To be sure, every campaign makes expensive promises that will never come to pass, especially with a divided Congress. Remember Mr. Biden’s pledge to make community college free? Even adjusted for the pandering standards of campaign economics, however, Ms. Harris’s speech Friday ranks as a disappointment. 
 

She's losing the Washington Post......

Not good

BooRadley » 17 Aug 2024, 6:35 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2024, 6:35 am

She's losing the Washington Post......

Not good

SHe's losing a LOT of them with her vapid attempts to distance from Joenochhio and his policies, which SHE WAS INVOLVED IN IMPLEMENTING!!

OBVIOUSLY they think they can run from the reckoning that is going to happen and look like heroes for doing so. Funny how that MEDIA turns when you refuse even the SOFTBALL QUESTIONS that are sure to arise since the ANSWERS YOU GIVE with the giggling and **** simply won't fly!!

You don't try to turn this country into Venezuelan and expect to win. Even the media knows that one.

Beekeeper » 17 Aug 2024, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2024, 6:27 am

You REALLY can't make this **** up folks. When you LOSE THE WASHINGTON COMPOST, YOU LOST THE ELECTION!!!

Even THEY know that what you LWNJ's have is a VAPID, INCOHERENT, AND DESPERATE CANDIDATE that has NOTHING but COMMUNIST IDEOLOGY that is an ABJECT FAILURE waiting to be kicked to the curb.

Vice President Kamala Harris’ plan to avoid the media because her team laughably thinks that no one pays attention to significant networks or prominent newspapers isn’t going to last. Yes, media is an ever-changing landscape, but solely focusing on TikTok and social media is a surefire way to lose an election. People need to hear ideas and policies that will help them, and Kamala hasn’t offered much. What she has provided is a throwback to Soviet Russia.

 It’s a window into why her team keeps her from press conferences. The latest pitch to curb inflation is to stomp out price-gouging, which is such pie-in-the-sky nonsense that it almost makes you wonder if Harris qualifies for this office. She’s not—you know that, but that’s not the point: what the hell is this campaign other than showing that Democrats have a black woman running after wresting the nomination from Joe Biden? Catherine Rampell trashed Harris, and now the editorial board writ large is body-slamming her, calling her candidacy gimmicky: 

 Americans are clearly still anxious and angry about the high cost of groceries, housing and even $5.29 Big Macs. While the inflation rate has cooled substantially since the 2022 peak, an ostensible Biden-Harris administration accomplishment, prices remain elevated relative to the Trump years. So it’s a real political issue for Ms. Harris. One way to handle it might be to level with voters, telling them that inflation spiked in 2021 mainly because the pandemic snarled supply chains, and that the Federal Reserve’s policies, which the Biden-Harris administration supported, are working to slow it. The vice president instead opted for a less forthright route: Blaming big business. She vowed to go after “price gouging” by grocery stores, landlords, pharmaceutical companies and other supposed corporate perpetrators by having the Federal Trade Commission enforce a vaguely defined “federal ban on price gouging.” 

 Never mind that many stores are currently slashing prices in response to renewed consumer bargain hunting. Ms. Harris says she’ll target companies that make “excessive” profits, whatever that means… 

 […] 
 Her ideas would cost money, yet she insisted in her speech that she would hold to President Joe Biden’s pledge not to raise taxes on any household earning $400,000 or less annually. That excludes 80 percent of taxable income, and does not take into account the recent surge in families earning over $400,000. The Harris campaign says it plans to raise revenue to cover these costs but did not provide specific offsets in its economic plan rollout. Without them, Ms. Harris’s full plan would add $1.7 trillion to federal deficits over a decade, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a nonpartisan budget watchdog. 

 To be sure, every campaign makes expensive promises that will never come to pass, especially with a divided Congress. Remember Mr. Biden’s pledge to make community college free? Even adjusted for the pandering standards of campaign economics, however, Ms. Harris’s speech Friday ranks as a disappointment.

This is easier, just the title is enough...

 




 

Price controls?

Can you imagine the bureaucracy this will start.....?

Jantje_Smit » 17 Aug 2024, 6:53 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2024, 6:53 am

This is easier, just the title is enough...

 

You have to remember, LWNJ's might actually READ the text, but even that is going to be hard for them to comprehend since their limit of that is down in the low 3-4 percentile.

BooRadley » 17 Aug 2024, 6:55 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2024, 6:55 am

Price controls?

Can you imagine the bureaucracy this will start.....?

Failed for Nixon, Failed for the Soviet Union, Failed for Venezuela.

"But when we are in charge, we can make it work this time". Famous last words of a DYING DEMOCRAT PARTY that the LEMMINGS AND FOOLS suck up like pablum through a straw.

BooRadley » 17 Aug 2024, 6:35 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2024, 6:35 am

She's losing the Washington Post......

Not good

The comments section is hilarious...snowflake central "WaPo be damned!"

ROG62 » 17 Aug 2024, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2024, 7:02 am

The comments section is hilarious...snowflake central "WaPo be damned!"

Funny how they LOVE them as long as they are blowing SMOKE up their asses but let them tell the FACTS AND TRUTH and they **** themselves and just can't imagine that their world is being shattered with those same truths and facts.

Seems it's over if Trump take Pennsylvania AND GEORGIA!!

https://www.270towin.com/map-images/6d9GN.png
 

Beekeeper » 17 Aug 2024, 7:04 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2024, 7:04 am

Funny how they LOVE them as long as they are blowing SMOKE up their asses but let them tell the FACTS AND TRUTH and they **** themselves and just can't imagine that their world is being shattered with those same truths and facts.

Totally...it's all good when they say what you want to hear....
 

Jantje_Smit » 17 Aug 2024, 6:53 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2024, 6:53 am

This is easier, just the title is enough...

 

 

And leaving out the rest of the swing states, Trump still WINS!!

https://www.270towin.com/map-images/8K92y.png
 

ROG62 » 17 Aug 2024, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2024, 7:12 am

Totally...it's all good when they say what you want to hear....

Our board resident lemming, @maineman  is going to be pissed!!! His precious WAPO stopping the love and cuddles for kamalyBWAhahaha!!

 

Why is it even close?

I thought Kamalahaha was supposed to be moving to the middle.

BuckNaked » 17 Aug 2024, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2024, 8:04 am

Why is it even close?

With an "economic plan" like this, it won't be for long!!!

Her MARXIST stripes are showing massively now and it won't be long before the idiots that jumped on her cart will be jumping off. I told you that sugar high wouldn't last, and it won't. When she unveils her "planks" at the convention and it sounds like something out of the Communist Manifesto, you'll see the results.

Not to mention that Trump will tear her 20 new assholes in the debates over her COMMUNISM she is touting.

Beekeeper » 18 Aug 2024, 4:56 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2024, 4:56 am

With an "economic plan" like this, it won't be for long!!!

Her MARXIST stripes are showing massively now and it won't be long before the idiots that jumped on her cart will be jumping off. I told you that sugar high wouldn't last, and it won't. When she unveils her "planks" at the convention and it sounds like something out of the Communist Manifesto, you'll see the results.

Not to mention that Trump will tear her 20 new assholes in the debates over her COMMUNISM she is touting.

He can’t be mean to her he can’t lay into her 

BuckNaked » 18 Aug 2024, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2024, 7:02 am

He can’t be mean to her he can’t lay into her

****!! Exposing her for the COMMUNIST SHE IS, is more than fair game in a gun fight!!

And if it means being mean, so be it!! She needs to have her asshole reamed and her agenda EXPOSED in doing so. Otherwise, you are giving her a pass for her hard MARXIST ideology and what she would do to this nation!!

Beekeeper » 18 Aug 2024, 7:05 am » wrote: ↑

18 Aug 2024, 7:05 am

****!! Exposing her for the COMMUNIST SHE IS, is more than fair game in a gun fight!!

And if it means being mean, so be it!! She needs to have her asshole reamed and her agenda EXPOSED in doing so. Otherwise, you are giving her a pass for her hard MARXIST ideology and what she would do to this nation!!

Ok but only on her policies not her looks her race and not her bung hole