Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 21 Aug 2024, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑

21 Aug 2024, 6:27 am

I really have to?

You're a **** moron.

I'll let the PRESIDING JUDGE speak to that...

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Since the accusation is enough then why is Clinton speaking?
 
 

Got yourself in a jam huh?

You say you DON'T need a conviction...

Then why is Clinton speaking at the DNC?

Blackvegetable » 21 Aug 2024, 6:29 am » wrote: ↑

21 Aug 2024, 6:29 am

All I need is a "finding", Fondler.

**** idiot.

So show us where a JURY had a "finding" of RAPE, because an OPINION is like a limp dick- you ain't got much to **** with!!

Blackvegetable » 21 Aug 2024, 5:54 am » wrote: ↑

21 Aug 2024, 5:54 am

Rape, 34 felony counts, fraud, 2XWorse than Buchanan. 

What's not to hate?

Shut up Ron

Blackvegetable » 21 Aug 2024, 6:14 am » wrote: ↑

21 Aug 2024, 6:14 am

Not required, Imbecile.

Sure it is!!! Since NO JURY FINDING OR CONVICTION means you got NO RAPE CLAIM!!

Sucks, huh???

https://i.postimg.cc/br66z6Fn/****.jpg

Beekeeper » 21 Aug 2024, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑

21 Aug 2024, 7:00 am

Sure it is!!! Since NO JURY FINDING OR CONVICTION means you got NO RAPE CLAIM!!

Sucks, huh???

https://i.postimg.cc/br66z6Fn/****.jpg

 

Since NO JURY FINDING

Reality makes absolutely no impression on you, does it...

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

so **** gdammned stupid.
 

Independent » 21 Aug 2024, 6:59 am » wrote: ↑

21 Aug 2024, 6:59 am

Shut up Ron

It's Slocum.

Beekeeper » 21 Aug 2024, 6:59 am » wrote: ↑

21 Aug 2024, 6:59 am

So show us where a JURY had a "finding" of RAPE, because an OPINION is like a limp dick- you ain't got much to **** with!!

So **** stupid...
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Aug 2024, 7:05 am » wrote: ↑

21 Aug 2024, 7:05 am

Reality makes absolutely no impression on you, does it...

He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

so **** gdammned stupid.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
So **** gdamned stupid.

NEW YORK (AP) — A jury found Donald Trump liable Tuesday for sexually abusing advice columnist E. Jean Carroll in 1996, awarding her $5 million in a judgment that could haunt the former president as he campaigns to regain the White House.

 The verdict was split: Jurors rejected Carroll’s claim that she was raped, finding Trump responsible for a lesser degree of sexual abuse. The judgment adds to Trump’s legal woes and offers vindication to Carroll, whose allegations had been mocked and dismissed by Trump for years.

https://apnews.com/article/trump-rape-c ... f9ec83d7db
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Aug 2024, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑

21 Aug 2024, 7:06 am

So **** stupid...

NOT ME making MORONIC CLAIMS of "fact" that NEVER HAPPENED AND NO JURY EVER FOUND there DICKBREATH!!!

THAT would be you and your dumbassery on display!!

Beekeeper » 21 Aug 2024, 7:07 am » wrote: ↑

21 Aug 2024, 7:07 am

NOT ME making MORONIC CLAIMS of "fact" that NEVER HAPPENED AND NO JURY EVER FOUND there DICKBREATH!!!

THAT would be you and your dumbassery on display!!

You literally cannot read.
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Aug 2024, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑

21 Aug 2024, 7:10 am

You literally cannot read.

That girl you mentally raped in your gym.  What if she pressed charges and a corrupt judge and jury convicted you just for your thought crime.  Would you be guilty, Chris?
 

*Huey » 21 Aug 2024, 7:07 am » wrote: ↑

21 Aug 2024, 7:07 am

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
So **** gdamned stupid.

NEW YORK (AP) — A jury found Donald Trump liable Tuesday for sexually abusing advice columnist E. Jean Carroll in 1996, awarding her $5 million in a judgment that could haunt the former president as he campaigns to regain the White House.

 The verdict was split: Jurors rejected Carroll’s claim that she was raped, finding Trump responsible for a lesser degree of sexual abuse. The judgment adds to Trump’s legal woes and offers vindication to Carroll, whose allegations had been mocked and dismissed by Trump for years.

https://apnews.com/article/trump-rape-c ... f9ec83d7db

Post the date of that citation, Brick...

Independent » 21 Aug 2024, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑

21 Aug 2024, 7:12 am

That girl you mentally raped in your gym.  What if she pressed charges and a corrupt judge and jury convicted you just for your thought crime.  Would you be guilty, Chris?

Put on your Lululemons and come on down to PF, and see...

*Huey » 21 Aug 2024, 7:07 am » wrote: ↑

21 Aug 2024, 7:07 am

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
So **** gdamned stupid.

NEW YORK (AP) — A jury found Donald Trump liable Tuesday for sexually abusing advice columnist E. Jean Carroll in 1996, awarding her $5 million in a judgment that could haunt the former president as he campaigns to regain the White House.

 The verdict was split: Jurors rejected Carroll’s claim that she was raped, finding Trump responsible for a lesser degree of sexual abuse. The judgment adds to Trump’s legal woes and offers vindication to Carroll, whose allegations had been mocked and dismissed by Trump for years.

https://apnews.com/article/trump-rape-c ... f9ec83d7db

How **** stupid would you have to be to post this, AGAIN, in response to the very clear statement of THE PRESIDING JUDGE?

Blackvegetable » 21 Aug 2024, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑

21 Aug 2024, 7:10 am

You literally cannot read.

I READ the JURY FINDINGS and there was NO FINDING OF RAPE!!

And THAT is the ONLY "verdict" or OPINION that matters in the COURT OF LAW IN THIS NATION!! Ever read the US Constitution and see that part where you have a RIGHT To a trial in front of a jury of your peers??

Can you point us to that section in the Constitution where a "judge" can bloviate his "opinion" and that be a factual finding??? NO?? Well imagine that, DICKBREATH, you got CURB STOMPED AGAIN!!

Blackvegetable » 21 Aug 2024, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑

21 Aug 2024, 7:12 am

Post the date of that citation, Brick...

You can click the link and find out.  

ANd then post it yourself.   My point is made on the topic....AGAN!  The jury did rejected the rape claim.  That is a fact.  

Blackvegetable » 21 Aug 2024, 7:16 am » wrote: ↑

21 Aug 2024, 7:16 am

How **** stupid would you have to be to post this, AGAIN, in response to the very clear statement of THE PRESIDING JUDGE?

How many times you gonna reply to that?  What I posted is fact.  The jury rejected the rape claim.  You can not deny that.  

*Huey » 21 Aug 2024, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑

21 Aug 2024, 7:27 am

You can click the link and find out.  

ANd then post it yourself.   My point is made on the topic....AGAN!  The jury did rejected the rape claim.  That is a fact.

Run.

*Huey » 21 Aug 2024, 7:28 am » wrote: ↑

21 Aug 2024, 7:28 am

How many times you gonna reply to that?  What I posted is fact.  The jury rejected the rape claim.  You can not deny that.

You're a **** idiot.

Presiding judge.

Google it.