Blackvegetable » 21 Aug 2024, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑ The judge is the law in his/her courtroom.
Try to grasp this.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!Blackvegetable » 21 Aug 2024, 7:16 am » wrote: ↑ How **** stupid would you have to be to post this, AGAIN, in response to the very clear statement of THE PRESIDING JUDGE?
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
Do you understand why Aileen Cannon was free to ignore decades of precedent in favor of Free Ride's legal aside?Beekeeper » 21 Aug 2024, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑ No, the JUDGE IS NOT THE LAW IN ANY COURTROOM!!!
His purpose is to INTERPRET THE LAW so that LAWYERS present cases that FALL WITHIN THE RULES OF EVIDENCE, THAT A FAIR TRAIL IS ASSURED THE DEFENDANT, and that the JURY HEARS EVIDENCE that doesn't prejudice their verdict with extemporaneous ****!!
He doesn't get to say a jury found RAPE when their VERDICT CARD SAID THEY DIDN'T!!!
You mean "decades of precedent" where EVERY Special Council or Prosecutor was an APPOINTED AND CONFIRMED BY THE SENATE AS a ATTORNEY BEFORE THEIR APPOINTMENT? THAT precedent??Blackvegetable » 21 Aug 2024, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑ Do you understand why Aileen Cannon was free to ignore decades of precedent in favor of Free Ride's legal aside?
hate? I thought it was hope and joyIndependent » 21 Aug 2024, 5:29 am » wrote: ↑ dude. It’s over
DNC is a disaster! They don’t realize how poorly this is playing for the vast majority. They are so wrapped up in their hate.
BooRadley » 21 Aug 2024, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑ Black Veggie already said...
"a conviction isn't required"
She relied entirely on an untested theory offered by Free Ride Thomas a few weeks prior.Beekeeper » 21 Aug 2024, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ You mean "decades of precedent" where EVERY Special Council or Prosecutor was an APPOINTED AND CONFIRMED BY THE SENATE AS a ATTORNEY BEFORE THEIR APPOINTMENT? THAT precedent??
Seeing how Jack Smith wasn't and still hasn't been CONFIRMED BY THE US SENATE TO even PICK UP DOG ****!! Something about that CONSTITUTION that you need to learn MASSIVELY about!! Her ruling WILL hold up in the SCOTUS, DICKYSUCKYBOY!!
Blackvegetable » 21 Aug 2024, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑ She relied entirely on an untested theory offered by Free Ride Thomas a few weeks prior.
The point being that her interpretation of the law stands until overturned.
Blackvegetable » 21 Aug 2024, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑ She relied entirely on an untested theory offered by Free Ride Thomas a few weeks prior.
The point being that her interpretation of the law stands until overturned.
Blackvegetable » 21 Aug 2024, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑ She relied entirely on an untested theory offered by Free Ride Thomas a few weeks prior.
The point being that her interpretation of the law stands until overturned.