I heard about that, it's allowed, Walz counts as an emotional support animal..

The strong fake woman - needs a man to sit there with her. Hilarious...PhiloBeddo » 29 Aug 2024, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑ It's not an interview. It's a produced propaganda session. Edited and highly produced.
What time does it air?golfboy » 27 Aug 2024, 9:28 pm » wrote: ↑ On CNN
With AWalz holding her hand
Recorded so it can be edited and scrubbed of her usual screw ups.
How pathetic.
maineman » 28 Aug 2024, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑ sucks to be you. I guess. I am Riden' with Kamala and Tim...
either do something about it or sit down and shut the **** up.
DeezerShoove » 29 Aug 2024, 5:18 pm » wrote: ↑ So you can't dispute it. You are one useless poster.
Where's all them debatin' skills? Layin' down ain't much spine...
btw
Learn to comprehend when reading.
You're still invested in her "win". I said it doesn't matter.
Kinda stupid, are ya?
Biden's numbers are better....DeezerShoove » 28 Aug 2024, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑ Or the border, for damn sure.
She WILL mention Trump and how he's at fault for the last four years.
Why must your uninformed drivel be "disputed", Coozie?DeezerShoove » 28 Aug 2024, 8:31 pm » wrote: ↑ It doesn't matter if she wins.
She is still a useless cocksucker and you're still a partisan hack.
People like to wail about **** here and claim wonderful deeds. Emotionally invested.
Like you thinking a stupid twat changed because of a marketing strategy.
She's just reinforcing the growing lack of trust in our system. <- dispute that if you can.
You're making a case to portray yourself as something less than a real man.maineman » 28 Aug 2024, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑ ****. she'll talk about the border.
And she'll make the case that the master of chaos does not deserve another shot at it.
maineman » 29 Aug 2024, 5:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Of course it matters. We might not survive four years of a convicted felon with unlimited immunity who promised to be a dictator on day one.
Blackvegetable » 29 Aug 2024, 5:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Why must your uninformed drivel be "disputed", Coozie?
It's not as if you'll stand and defend it.
No, it doesn't.maineman » 29 Aug 2024, 5:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Of course it matters. We might not survive four years of a convicted felon with unlimited immunity who promised to be a dictator on day one.
DeezerShoove » 29 Aug 2024, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑ No, it doesn't.
Only matters to idiots that believe when things go your way, everything's Jake (legal or not).
How aboutDeezerShoove » 29 Aug 2024, 6:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Thank you.
Coming from a Champion Defender like yourself, this really helps.
I can't remember the last time you so vigorously took a stand.
maineman » 29 Aug 2024, 6:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Everything? Hardly. 2020 was legal. A win in 2024 will just keep the wolf from the door. It won't make everything Jake. Nothing ever will.
I just saw it.. well, the 'highlights'.. a nice propaganda piece, no doubt the faithful will lap it up and praise it later.. right, @Blackvegetable ?PhiloBeddo » 29 Aug 2024, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑ It's not an interview. It's a produced propaganda session. Edited and highly produced.
You could have read it.DeezerShoove » 29 Aug 2024, 10:44 pm » wrote: ↑ A link to a post formed as a question. How quaint.
I can only assume it's useless and another pissing contest.
To you a meandering diatribe with deflections is a vigorous stand.
Get ****.
name calling?DeezerShoove » 29 Aug 2024, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑ No, it doesn't.
Only matters to idiots that believe when things go your way, everything's Jake (legal or not).